Narration Archives | Based on a True Story https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/tag/narration/ The podcast that compares Hollywood with history. Tue, 17 Feb 2026 03:13:29 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/favicon-2-150x150.gif Narration Archives | Based on a True Story https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/tag/narration/ 32 32 109395640 382: Oppenheimer https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/382-oppenheimer/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/382-oppenheimer/#respond Fri, 30 Jan 2026 20:30:00 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=14250 BASED ON A TRUE STORY (BOATS EP. 382) — Join me in this throwback style BOATS episode without any guests. It’ll just be you and I learning about the true story behind 2023’s Oppenheimer. Learn More of the True Story Tales of Militant Chemistry by Alice Lovejoy American Prometheus Oppenheimer Official Screenplay 109 East Palace: […]

The post 382: Oppenheimer appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

BASED ON A TRUE STORY (BOATS EP. 382) — Join me in this throwback style BOATS episode without any guests. It’ll just be you and I learning about the true story behind 2023’s Oppenheimer.

Learn More of the True Story

Want to learn more?

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Listen to the audio version​

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

The Movie

The movie fades up to the sounds of rain pattering as Cillian Murphy’s version of a young J. Robert Oppenheimer watches. Then, with a cut to a massive explosion, we get some text on the screen that reads:

“Prometheus stole fire from the gods and gave it to man. For this he was chained to a rock and tortured for eternity.”

Then, just as quickly as it cuts to the quote, it cuts back to an older J. Robert Oppenheimer.

The True Story

As you can probably guess, that comes from Greek mythology. It’s not really a direct quote of anything, though, but rather it’s more of a paraphrased synopsis of the Prometheus myth.

The whole story is thousands of lines of text, so I won’t include the whole thing here either, but I’ll add a link to it in the show notes if you want to read it all. The movie’s summary is pretty good, though, considering they’re breaking it all down into just a couple lines.

Prometheus was a Titan who was bound by Zeus’s servants Hephaestus, Power, and Force as punishment for stealing fire from the gods and giving it to the humans. That’s how humans were able to progress to a more civilized society with technology thanks to harnessing fire. When he was bound, Prometheus’s torture was basically being exposed to the scorching sun by the day, freezing at night, and then an eagle would eat his liver. The next day, the liver would regenerate and the cycle repeated itself.

The Movie

Back in the movie, we see Oppenheimer going to Europe to study under Patrick Blackett in Cambridge. He’s played by James D’Arcy in the movie. While Oppenheimer is there, the movie focuses on a rather curious moment when Oppenheimer injects Blackett’s apple with potassium cyanide. Then, the next day, he seems to have a change of heart and when he rushes back to the classroom while Neils Bohr is talking to Blackett, and Oppenheimer knocks the apple down just in time, claiming there was a wormhole in the apple.

The True Story

While the movie doesn’t really focus on Oppenheimer’s time as a student in the United States as it does in Europe, it is correct to mention him going to Europe to study under Patrick Blackett at Cambridge.

To back up for a moment, though, what we don’t see much of in the movie is Oppenheimer’s time at Harvard. He went there in 1922 when he was 18 years old and majored in chemistry. That’s how he got interested in physics, when one of his professors named Percy Bridgman taught a course on thermodynamics that interested Oppenheimer. And so, after graduating summa cum laude in 1925 after only three years, Oppenheimer went to Christ’s College, Cambridge, to study physics.

More specifically, that was at the Cavendish Laboratory at the University of Cambridge’s Department of Physics. Oppenheimer was there for about a year from 1925 to 1926.

And that scene with the poisoned apple? That really happened!

The movie implies that Oppenheimer was rather clumsy in the lab, and that’s a bit of truth that frustrated Oppenheimer. On top of that, Professor Blackett was an incredibly demanding teacher. This grew into a resentment for Blackett and by the time the autumn of 1925 rolled around, the then-22-year-old Oppenheimer was struggling badly and feeling incompetent with his lab work.

So, Oppenheimer used chemicals from the lab and injected them into an apple on Blackett’s desk. There’s some debate around exactly what he used and how much—after all, it’s not like this is the kind of thing that gets documented—but we know it happened because he confessed what he’d done to one of his friends. It was most likely cyanide, and probably wasn’t enough to kill him, just to make him sick.

But, that’s irrelevant, because just like we see in the movie, Blackett never ate the apple. Although the movie shows Oppenheimer having a change of mind and rushing back to toss the apple before Blackett can eat it, and that part of the movie seems to be a bit of dramatic license.

The sources I saw merely mentioned that Professor Blackett simply tossed the apple without ever knowing it had been poisoned. There’s nothing I could find that suggested Oppenheimer had a change of mind and rushed back, or that he was even there when the apple was discarded.

The Movie

Going back to the movie, during the apple scene we also see Oppenheimer talking to the visiting lecturer Neils Bohr. In that conversation and due to Oppenheimer’s lack of skills in the lab, Bohr recommends Oppenheimer go to Germany to study theoretical physics under Max Born because there’s no lab work required for that.

The True Story

Since we already learned the poisoned apple story didn’t happen exactly like that in the movie, it’s probably not a surprise to learn this other side of it didn’t happen the same way either.

What is accurate, though, is that the Oppenheimer did meet the Danish physicist Neils Bohr. While the movie doesn’t really mention much about who he was other than to suggest Oppenheimer was looking forward to hearing him speak. He won a Nobel Prize in Physics in 1922, so when he visited Cambridge just a few years later, I can only imagine how excited Oppenheimer must’ve been to meet one of the most respected minds in his field.

Unlike what we see in the movie, though, it wasn’t Neils Bohr who recommended Oppenheimer go to Germany to study under Max Born.

As you might expect, Max Born was a German physicist and he was also highly respected in the 1920s, and after World War II went on to become one of the people who was instrumental in the development of quantum mechanics.

So, probably the biggest change is the movie simplified the events.

In the true story, Oppenheimer actually met both Neils Bohr and Max Born while he was at Cambridge. Not necessarily at the same time, though, so it makes sense why the movie simplified it all. But amidst Oppenheimer’s depression from his poor lab work, and I’m sure the whole apple debacle didn’t help, but Oppenheimer decided to leave Cambridge to go to the University of GURT-in-en (Göttingen) in Germany so he could study theoretical physics under Max Born.

GURT-ing-en

Unlike his time in Cambridge, Oppenheimer flourished in his theoretical studies. Just six months after moving to Germany, Oppenheimer graduated with his PhD and co-authored the Born-Oppenheimer approximation with Max Born. He was making a name for himself.

The Movie

After studying in Germany, the movie talks about Oppenheimer returning to the United States where he sets up the theoretical physics department at the University of California, Berkley. Then after all of this setup of Oppenheimer’s education and early career are taking place while we see black and white sequences with Robert Downey Jr.’s version of Lewis Strauss hiring Oppenheimer to work at what the movie only calls “the Institute.”

The True Story

This is where we really start to see the movie bouncing around in the timeline, because Oppenheimer wasn’t appointed as the director of the Institute for Advanced Study until 1947. That’s clearly after World War II and the Manhattan Project. Since we’re following the movie’s timeline of events, we’ll be bouncing around a bit as well, but here is a quick overview of Oppenheimer’s timeline in the true story.

After graduating with his doctorate from the University of Göttingen in Germany in March of 1927, Oppenheimer stayed in Europe for post-doc studies where he spent time in Leiden and Zurich studying under the great minds of the day.

In the fall of 1929, he returned to the U.S. and accepted a position as an associate professor at UC Berkley. He stayed there, but in the spring of 1930, he also started teaching at Caltech. For the next twelve years he went back and forth, splitting time teaching as a full professor at UC Berkley while also being a full professor at Caltech, although he had a special agreement with UC Berkley to release him for six weeks out of the year to teach at Caltech for a term.

This is the time that he built UC Berkley’s theoretical physics program into something of renown that we hear Robert Downey Jr.’s version of Lewis Strauss mention in the movie. But that was in 1947 when Oppenheimer joined the Institute, as we talked about before.

So, from 1930 until 1942, he was splitting time at UC Berkley and Caltech. In 1942, he was given leave to work on the Manhattan Project, and then he returned to Caltech in 1946. He resigned both Caltech and UC Berkley in 1947 to take the job of director at the Institute for Advanced Study.

The Movie

Speaking of the Institute for Advanced Study, in the movie that’s where we see another famous scientist: Albert Einstein. If we’re to believe the movie’s version of history, Oppenheimer seems to think Einstein is a has-been. For example, there’s a line of dialogue early in the movie when Strauss tells Oppenheimer that Einstein is the “greatest scientific mind of our time.” Oppenheimer replies by saying, “Of his time.”

The True Story

While I couldn’t find anything in my research to indicate this exact line of dialogue about Einstein being the greatest scientific mind of “his” time, but the movie is correctly capturing the essence of the relationship between Einstein and Oppenheimer. Before he worked at the Institute, Oppenheimer visited Princeton in 1935. After that, he wrote a letter to his brother where he said, “Princeton is a madhouse: its solipsistic luminaries shining in separate & helpless desolation. Einstein is completely cuckoo.”

About ten years later, Einstein said of the theory Oppenheimer was primarily focusing on, “The quantum theory is without a doubt a useful theory, but it does not reach to the bottom of things. I never believed that it constitutes the true conception of nature.”

Despite these differences, they still had a mutual respect and were cordial with each other. After Einstein passed away in 1955, Oppenheimer wrote publicly that, “…physicists lost their greatest colleague…”

The Movie

Heading back to the movie’s timeline, there’s a line of dialogue from Lewis Strauss as he’s showing Oppenheimer around the Institute when he says the position comes with a house for his family: His wife and two children.

And that introduces us to the next major plot point, because the movie doesn’t focus on Robert Oppenheimer’s personal life a lot, but we do see two relationships that he has…and according to the movie they overlap. First, he has a girlfriend named Jean Tatlock, but then he gets a married woman named Kitty Harrison pregnant. Since Kitty is pregnant, Robert leaves Jean while Kitty leaves her husband to marry Robert. But then, later in the movie, we see Robert having an affair with Jean again.

The True Story

This back-and-forth sort of relationship that we see in the movie does a pretty good job capturing what J. Robert Oppenheimer’s personal life was really like. The key thing the movie does, though, is to mess with the timeline because once again it’s jumping around.

Remember, Oppenheimer’s job at the Institute was in 1947. So, his wife at that time was the woman we see in the movie: Kitty Harrison. She’s played by Emily Blunt.

Kitty’s surname in the movie is actually from one of her husbands before Oppenheimer. Her maiden name was Vissering. She married Frank Ramseyer in 1932, then had that annulled in 1933. The next year, she married Joe Dallet. That lasted until he died in 1937, and then in 1938 she married Richard Harrison. They were divorced in 1940 when she married J. Robert Oppenheimer.

The two children Robert and Kitty had together, Peter and Toni, were the only kids either of them had.

The Movie

In the movie, we see Robert having an girlfriend in Jean Tatlock. But he sleeps with Kitty Harrison, who was a married woman as we just learned, and gets her pregnant. So, Kitty divorces her husband, Robert breaks things off with Jean, and then Robert and Kitty get married.

The True Story

Once again, the movie gets the essence of the story correct, but the timeline was sped up and changed from history.

So, here’s a quick rundown to unravel the historical timeline.

Robert Oppenheimer met Jean Tatlock in the Spring of 1936 when he was teaching at UC Berkley. She was a student there, and it didn’t take long for a romance to blossom. And if you’re wondering, since he was a teacher and she was a student, he was 32 and she was 22. Their relationship developed quickly and Jean had a big influence on shaping Robert’s left-leaning political views. Robert proposed to Jean twice, both of which she rejected, and then in the Spring of 1939, she broke it off with him.

A few months later, in August of 1939, Robert met Kitty Harrison at a party hosted by another physicist. At that time, she was 29 and he was 35. Almost immediately, an affair started. They didn’t hide it, either, as there were reports of Robert and Kitty driving around together in the open.

In the summer of 1940, there was a notable event when Robert Oppenheimer invited Richard and Kitty Harrison to his ranch in New Mexico. Richard Harrison declined the invitation saying he was too busy with work, but Kitty accepted. So, another physicist named Robert Serber along with his wife Charlotte, picked up Kitty in Pasadena and drove her to Oppenheimer’s ranch in New Mexico where they found Robert’s brother, Frank, and Frank’s wife Jackie there.

So, again, the affair wasn’t really a secret. Oh, and at that time, Kitty was pregnant with Robert’s child…who would be Peter, their firstborn.

Well, you can probably see where this is going.

On November 1st, 1940, Kitty divorced her husband. The very next day, on November 2nd, 1940, she married Robert Oppenheimer.

But…things weren’t all sunshine and rainbows, because only a couple months after marrying Kitty, who should show back up in Robert’s life? Jean. She reconnected with him and the historical record shows that Robert’s first New Years celebration as a married man, he spent it not with his wife Kitty, but Jean Tatlock.

For the next few years, Robert and Jean maintained contact a couple times a year. While we don’t know the specifics of what happened each time, it’s probably safe to say they were romantic connections.

Despite this, from what we can tell, Kitty knew about Robert’s affair with Jean, and she seemed to tolerate it. Although, to be fair, some have debated just how much she knew. Maybe she only knew them to be friends at first. We don’t really know for sure where that line was crossed, but we know from the FBI tapping their lines in 1943 that Oppenheimer himself said he told Kitty about the affair with Jean, so we can assume she at least knew by then.

The Movie

Speaking of Jean, I’ll throw out a quick content warning here, because something else we see in the movie is a suicide. It happens when Oppenheimer tells Jean that he can’t do the affair anymore, she gets depressed and takes her own life. Robert is shaken by this, but Kitty tells him that he doesn’t get to commit the sin and then make other people feel sorry for him.

The True Story

Unfortunately, that’s true. That was in January of 1944 when Jean was discovered in her bathtub in San Francisco. There was an unsigned note that suggested suicide, and officially it was ruled to be the result of ingesting sedatives and alcohol.

The movie makes it seem like she did it because Robert broke off their affair, but there’s been a lot of controversies surrounding her death.

For example, the note was unsigned. An autopsy suggested she’d eaten a full meal before she died, which the doctor at the time found curious since it’d slow down the effect of the drugs she’d ingested. Her body was discovered by her father, John Tatlock, who moved it from the bathtub to the sofa and then burned a bunch of her letters in the fireplace before calling the funeral parlor—it was the parlor that contacted the police some four hours after she’d died.

Curious things, perhaps, and to be fair as with many debated events in history, not all of those are documented as well as others. But, if there was a conspiracy around her death, that begs the question: Why?

Well, to go down that road, we’d have to remember the timeline. January of 1944. At this point, Robert Oppenheimer was working at the top-secret Manhattan Project. Jean Tatlock was a known member of the Communist Party. If you recall, a moment ago I mentioned the FBI tapped Oppenheimer’s line in 1943 and those revealed that he talked to Kitty about the affair with Jean. The whole reason the FBI was tapping his lines to begin with was because of his association with the Communist Party. They started that in March of 1941, even before he was recruited into the Manhattan Project. Of course, it didn’t stop once he was heading up the top-secret project, so that’s why some think perhaps there was a government coverup to kill Jean Tatlock to keep atomic secrets from getting into the hands of the Soviets.

Then again, Oppenheimer himself believed Jean committed suicide. She was clinically depressed, and she worked as a psychiatrist, so she had access to sedatives pretty easily.

What do you think? If you have any other details or research you’ve done, let me know!

The Movie

For now, if we head back into the movie for the next major plot point, it’s Oppenheimer being recruited into the Manhattan Project by Matt Damon’s version of General Leslie Groves.

But the way we see this happening in the movie, Groves tells Oppenheimer that his name didn’t even come up in the search for a project director even though it was Oppenheimer who brought quantum physics to America. So, the impression I got from the movie was basically if it wasn’t for Groves then Oppenheimer wouldn’t be involved in the Manhattan Project at all.

The True Story

In the true story, that’s not really how it happened. To know what really happened, let’s go back to around the time of Oppenheimer marrying Kitty in late 1940, and then Peter being born in May of 1941. While that was going on in his personal life, in his professional life, Oppenheimer was collaborating on a radiation lab with Ernest Lawrence, who won the 1939 Nobel Prize in physics. That lab was where Lawrence had invented the cyclotron, a particle accelerator he’d patented back in 1932.

After the United States entered World War II, Lawrence recruited Oppenheimer to work on fission and fast neutron experiments at the UC Berkley lab. As you recall, he’d built the theoretical physics program there, so from July to September of 1942, Oppenheimer assembled a group of theoretical physicists to come up with the principles of a bomb design. Seeing as Oppenheimer was the one who built the theoretical physics program at UC Berkley anyway, over those few short months he became a leader of that group.

So, all of that is to say:

That is why U.S. Army General Leslie R. Groves recruited Oppenheimer on October 15th, 1942 to head up something called Project Y. About a month later, the two men visited Los Alamos, New Mexico for what they called Site Y.

The Movie

And that leads us into something else about the movie, because for a movie called Oppenheimer, it makes sense to focus on him as the main character. We do see a few others, like Isidor Rabi and at one point Robert brings his brother Frank in on the project, but the movie also mentions having to build a town with churches and schools and such, so it’s obviously not showing us the full scale.

The True Story

Now would be a good time to clarify the term “Manhattan Project” and why I’m referring to something in Los Alamos, New Mexico. This project was a lot bigger scale than what we see in the movie.

So, General Groves was from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and in August of 1942, they created something they called the Manhattan Engineer District, or MED. On the surface, it was routine construction in New York City. The true purpose was to cover up the work required for the atomic bomb project.

Over time, that name morphed from the Manhattan Engineer District to the Manhattan Project even though the project itself had sites around the country. As we just learned, Los Alamos, New Mexico was considered “Site Y,” while Oak Ridge, Tennessee was “Site X” and Hanover, Washington was “Site W.”

The Los Alamos location was where the primary work for the bomb design. That’s where Oppenheimer was at, along with about 6,000 workers. The other sites, Oak Ridge and Hanover, were more for providing the materials needed and they were much larger in scale than Los Alamos. There were about 50,000 people working in Hanover that focused primarily on producing plutonium, while Oak Ridge had another 75,000 people focusing on enriching uranium.

So, all in all, the Manhattan Project was a lot larger than what we see in the movie. But again, it’s called “Oppenheimer” and not “Manhattan Project.”

Actually, if you want to learn more about this, I’ve got another companion episode to this one with historian Alice Lovejoy that focuses more on the movie’s portrayal of the Manhattan Project. You can find that over at basedonatruestorypodcast.com/oppenheimer.

The Movie

Back to the movie now, and something that’s very easy to do when we’re watching a historical movie is to look at it from today’s perspective with the knowledge we have today. With that in mind, I thought Oppenheimer did a good job doing was helping us get a sense for what it was like before the nuclear age, because we see Oppenheimer having a major concern that an atomic bomb might start a chain reaction that would just keep going and going until the entire atmosphere has been destroyed and, by extension, everyone and everything on the planet would die.

The True Story

While the movie dramatizes the specifics of it, it’s very true that Oppenheimer and other scientists working on the Manhattan Project considered the possibility that detonating a nuclear device might start an unstoppable chain reaction that’d basically ignite the Earth’s atmosphere and end the world.

Although, as scary as that sounds, it’s often described as more of a “nonzero” risk. So, technically it’s not zero percent chance, but a miniscule chance that from a practical perspective is basically zero.

Except, we’re talking about the end of the world here, so you can understand why even a “nonzero” risk is still worth making sure it doesn’t happen.

The fear was mostly from the physicist Edward Teller, who was worried that a fission bomb would ignite the nitrogen in the atmosphere, or perhaps the hydrogen in the ocean, and just keep using that as fuel to burn. That was as early as 1942.

So, they did the math.

It wasn’t until 1946 that two other physicists at Los Alamos named Hans Bethe and Emil Konopinski formally published a paper that proved the reaction couldn’t continue on forever due to dropping air density and temperature thresholds. That was after the Trinity Test in 1945, but they’d obviously been working on it before then and from what we can tell, they had the math figured out by the time of the test, just hadn’t published the formal paper before it.

The Movie

Speaking of the Trinity Test, let’s head back to the movie because we’re at the point of the test itself. According to the movie, there’s an immense pressure to just use the atomic bomb to end World War II. The military has a list of 11 Japanese cities, and they want to drop two bombs on two of those cities. With a tight deadline, they need to detonate an atomic bomb to make sure it works and gather data like what’s a safe operating distance.

That’s how we get the test. In the movie, Groves asks Oppenheimer what they should call the test, and Oppenheimer says, “Batter my heart, three-person’d god.” Groves replies, “What?” to which Oppenheimer replies, “Trinity.”

It’s the first time an atomic bomb has been detonated and according to the movie, the test appears to be a massive success. As he’s watching this is when we see Oppenheimer use the now-famous quote, “I am become death. The destroyer of worlds.”

The True Story

In the true story, there wasn’t really a list of 11 Japanese cities like we see in the movie. There was actually about 16 cities that were considered by what the U.S. called the “Target Committee,” which was made up of 12 people at its height. Oppenheimer was the chair of the committee, along with members of the military and other scientists in the Manhattan Project.

By the spring of 1945, the 16 Japanese cities were narrowed down to five cities: Kyoto, Hiroshima, Yokohama, Kokura, and Niigata. They were chosen for size, military value, surrounding terrain to help amplify the bomb’s effects, as well as minimal previous bombing so they could see what effect the atomic bomb would have compared to other bombings.

Then came Monday, July 16th, 1945. The day of the Trinity Test.

The name itself is something the movie alludes to when we see Oppenheimer say, “Batter my heart, three person’d God.” That’s a line from the 17th-century poem from John Donne called Holy Sonnet XIV, which refers to the Christian Trinity. Much later when Groves asked him about the name, Oppenheimer said he wasn’t entirely sure why he picked it other than to think that “Trinity” might fit in with common Western-style names like “Three Rivers,” “Three Peaks,” and so on.

So, he must’ve thought the name “Trinity” wouldn’t attract much attention. Until it exploded, of course.

And the way see the Trinity Test itself happening in the movie is a pretty good re-enactment of what really happened that weekend. There were about 425 people at the Trinity Test site, which was roughly 210 miles south of Los Alamos, New Mexico. That broke down into about 250 scientists and engineers running the test, another 150 or so military as security, and between 20 to 30 VIPs. That included General Leslie Groves, who joined Oppenheimer at the primary command bunker that they called S-10,000 because it was 10,000 yards south of ground zero. That’s about 5.7 miles.

There were also scientists at N-10,000, and W-10,000, but there were mountains to the east so there wasn’t an E-10,000 post.

As for the goggles we see in the movie, those were real as well. The standard gear was dark lenses that filtered UV, and people were ordered to lie face-down, backs turned and put your arms over your eyes. Of course, not everyone did that. Most famously, Richard Feynman chose not to wear goggles and instead watched through the windshield of a truck.

At exactly 5:29 a.m. Mountain Time, the “Gadget” as they called it, detonated on a 100-foot tower. To say the blast exceeded all expectations was an understatement.

Radiation was higher than expected and people at the posts some 5.7 miles away were knocked over by the blast’s shockwave, although there weren’t any major injuries.

That brings us to the line, “Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”

That’s a line from the Bhagavad Gita, a 700-verse Hindu scripture that Oppenheimer paraphrased into that now-famous quote. Chapter 11, Verse 32 says, “I am Time, the destroyer of worlds, grown great, come to consume the worlds.”

Oppenheimer never uttered those words aloud, but in a 1965 documentary for NBC, Oppenheimer recalled that seeing how successful the Trinity Test was, he recounted that he remembered the Bhagavad Gita verse.

The Movie

Heading back to the movie’s version of events, the very next scene after the successful Trinity Test is some military guys saying, “With respect, Dr. Oppenheimer, we’ll take it from here.” And with that, they pack up a bomb and drive away. It happens so quickly in the movie, it’s almost as if that seems to be that they had a successful test, so that’s immediately the end of the Manhattan Project overall.

The True Story

That’s not really what happened. At least not nearly as fast as the movie makes it seem. So, once again, let’s unravel the true story’s timeline.

The Trinity Test was July 16th, 1945.

About three weeks later, on August 6th, the uranium gun-type bomb called “Little Boy” was dropped on Hiroshima, resulting in between 70,000 and 80,000 deaths instantly. The movie shows Oppenheimer finding out about the bombs through the radio, but he still worked at Los Alamos, where he found out that evening along with everyone else. Cheers erupted among the teams at Los Alamos on hearing the news, and Oppenheimer joined in the champagne toasts. Although, despite the celebrations, he also had moral qualms with the news.

Three days later, more news. The plutonium bomb “Fat Man” was dropped Nagasaki, with between 35,000 to 40,000 deaths instantly. Back in Los Alamos, there weren’t the same kind of celebrations. Oppenheimer was reported to say, “No, this is too much.”

On August 14th, 1945, Japan announced their intent to surrender. That’s U.S. time, in Japan it was August 15th. This effectively ended World War II, although the official surrender document wasn’t signed until September 2nd.

Then, on October 16th, exactly three months after the Trinity Test, Oppenheimer resigned from his position in Los Alamos. The Manhattan Project continued on without him, though, until it was disbanded on August 15th, 1947. As for Oppenheimer, he returned to Caltech where he resumed teaching, but quickly realized his heart wasn’t in it anymore.

The Movie

That leads us right up to Oppenheimer’s meeting with President Truman that we see in the movie. You know, the one where Oppenheimer says, “I feel that I have blood on my hands.” Truman replies with, “You think anyone in Hiroshima or Nagasaki gives a shit about who built the bomb? They care who dropped it. I did.”

Then, as Oppenheimer is shown out of the Oval Office, we can hear Truman in the background saying, “Don’t let that crybaby back in here.”

The True Story

That was a real meeting that took place on October 25th, 1945, not long after Oppenheimer resigned from Los Alamos. And the movie is correct to show that Oppenheimer told President Truman that he feels like he has blood on his hands. Truman’s reply was a little different than the movie, albeit with the same effect. Ray Month’s book called Robert Oppenheimer: A Life Inside the Center quotes Truman as saying, “Blood on his hands; damn it, he hasn’t half as much blood on his hands as I have. You just don’t go around bellyaching about it.”

Then, he called Oppenheimer a crybaby and said, “I don’t want to see that son of a bitch in this office ever again.”

Except, unlike what we see in the movie, all of that supposedly happened after Oppenheimer had already left so it’s not like it was something he heard as he was leaving like the movie shows.

The Movie

After leaving the Manhattan Project, the movie circles back to something it shows throughout with Lewis Strauss answering to Congress about hiring Oppenheimer for the Institute.

While I was watching that play out in the movie, it gave me the impression that despite Oppenheimer’s contributions to the war effort, his reputation was almost immediately tarnished after the war because of what the movie calls “left-wing associations” and being tied to communism. The movie also seems to imply that Strauss was orchestrating it all, which is quite a turn for the guy who hired Oppenheimer at the Institute.

The True Story

For the most part, the way the movie shows this happening is pretty accurate. It’s dramatized, naturally, but the core elements are there.

What the movie skips are a few years between that meeting with President Truman at the end of 1945 and Oppenheimer’s 1946, when he consulted in Washington on atomic policy and was appointed to the Atomic Energy Commission, or AEC. That leads us up to 1947, which actually takes us back to the beginning of the movie when we learned that Lewis Strauss recruited Oppenheimer to be the director of the Institute for Advanced Study.

What started out as a good relationship turned sour mainly due to Oppenheimer’s Communist ties, such as his wife Kitty and his brother, Frank, who was a confirmed member of the Communist Party USA from 1937 until around 1940.

After World War II, Oppenheimer was famous, but as the Cold War sparked what we now know as the Red Scare, people started to grow suspicious of him. Rumors spread, and anyone with top secret clearance like Oppenheimer had for the Manhattan Project was called into question.

As for Lewis Strauss, that relationship started to sour a couple years after he recruited Oppenheimer. In fact, now that the Manhattan Project is a National Park, here’s a quote from the National Park Services’ website to explain the exact moment Strauss stopped liking Oppenheimer:

Robert Oppenheimer, testifying before the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy including Lewis Strauss in 1949 on the military usefulness of Iron 59 said in part, “You can use a shovel for atomic energy. In fact you do. You can use a bottle of beer for atomic energy. In fact you do.” These and other comments by Oppenheimer, who was known for making biting remarks, caused people to laugh. Strauss looked foolish and was furious. “There was a look of hatred there [on Strauss’ face] you don’t see very often…” said one observer.

It wasn’t just that one comment, though, as you’ll notice that article talks about “other comments.” The Los Alamos National Laboratory’s website has another article that discusses another comment from Oppenheimer in that same hearing:

Strauss believed that radioactive isotopes had military value and argued against exporting them. However, with little patience for those he considered intellectually inferior, Oppenheimer publicly humiliated Strauss by saying, “My own rating of the importance of isotopes . . . is that they are far less important than electronic devices, but far more important than, let us say, vitamins.”

In response, Strauss didn’t hide his look of hatred. Oppenheimer had publicly revealed that Strauss knew little about physics, particularly nuclear science.

After that hearing, Lewis Strauss held a grudge against Oppenheimer. So, as Oppenheimer’s public image started to deteriorate into the Cold War era of the early 1950s, Strauss certainly didn’t want to do Oppenheimer any favors. Quite the opposite, actually, because Strauss asked the FBI to track Oppenheimer in 1953. They did, and delivered a report to Strauss on November 20th, 1953, which Strauss sent directly to President Eisenhower. Upon reviewing the report, Eisenhower decided to revoke Oppenheimer’s security clearance. That happened on December 21st, 1953, and Oppenheimer was given the choice to resign or appeal. He appealed the decision, which was heard by a three-man panel. They voted two-to-one not to reinstate the security clearance.

And with that, Oppenheimer’s government career was effectively over. But even though the movie doesn’t talk much about the rest of Oppenheimer’s life, let’s fill out the rest of the true story.

Despite his government career effectively coming to an end when his security clearance was revoked, Oppenheimer was still the director at the Institute for Advanced Study, but in 1954 he started taking vacations with his wife and daughter to the small island of Saint John in the U.S. Virgin Islands. They enjoyed sailing together, and they must’ve loved it there because in 1957, Oppenheimer bought some land and built a vacation home there.

He continued working for the Institute for Advanced Study and in March of 1963 he was awarded the Enrico Fermi Award. That’s kind of a lifetime achievement award for scientists with the medal physically given by the President of the United States. Oppenheimer winning that award was a big deal considering how he’d been shunned by the scientific community.

Unfortunately, though, JFK was assassinated before he was able to give the award to Oppenheimer, so President Lyndon B. Johnson formally gave him the award in December of 1963. Jackie Kennedy attended the ceremony and told Oppenheimer how much her husband wanted him to have the medal.

Oppenheimer was diagnosed with throat cancer in 1965. He tried radiation treatment, but it was unsuccessful, so he resigned from the Institute for Advanced Study in 1966 due to his health. Then, on February 18th, 1967, J. Robert Oppenheimer passed away in his sleep at home in Princeton at the age of 67.

I thought I’d end our story today with more recent news from just before the movie’s release in 2023. Because in 2022, the U.S. Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm issued this press release:

Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer occupies a central role in our history for leading the nation’s atomic efforts during World War II and planting the seeds for the Department of Energy’s national laboratories—the crown jewels of the American research and innovation ecosystem.

In 1954, the Atomic Energy Commission revoked Dr. Oppenheimer’s security clearance through a flawed process that violated the Commission’s own regulations. As time has passed, more evidence has come to light of the bias and unfairness of the process that Dr. Oppenheimer was subjected to while the evidence of his loyalty and love of country have only been further affirmed. The Atomic Energy Commission even selected Dr. Oppenheimer in 1963 for its prestigious Enrico Fermi Award citing his “scientific and administrative leadership not only in the development of the atomic bomb, but also in establishing the groundwork for the many peaceful applications of atomic energy.”

The Department of Energy has previously recognized J. Robert Oppenheimer in other ways including the creation of the Oppenheimer Science and Energy Leadership Program in 2017 to support early and mid-career scientists and engineers to “carry on [Dr. Oppenheimer’s] legacy of science serving society.”

As a successor agency to the Atomic Energy Commission, the Department of Energy has been entrusted with the responsibility to correct the historical record and honor Dr. Oppenheimer’s profound contributions to our national defense and the scientific enterprise at large. Today, I am pleased to announce the Department of Energy has vacated the Atomic Energy Commission’s 1954 decision In the Matter of J. Robert Oppenheimer.

The post 382: Oppenheimer appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/382-oppenheimer/feed/ 0 14250
251: Chernobyl Part 5 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/251-chernobyl-part-5/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/251-chernobyl-part-5/#respond Wed, 24 May 2023 11:00:00 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=8561 HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the final episode in the miniseries called Vichnaya Pamyat. See the sources Full Chernobyl Series Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one! Buy me a coffee Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True […]

The post 251: Chernobyl Part 5 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the final episode in the miniseries called Vichnaya Pamyat.

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

There’s text on the screen telling us we’re in Pripyat on April 25th, 1986. It’s 12 hours before the explosion.

Nikolai Fomin is meeting with Anatoly Dyatlov. He says once the safety test can be completed successfully, Viktor Bryukhanov will be promoted. That means Fomin will take Bryukhanov’s place and someone will need to fill Fomin’s place. Dyatlov says he wants to be considered for that position.

Just then, Bryukhanov enters the room. The test is ready to go, Fomin says. But Bryukhanov stops him short. He’s been trying to get this test done for three years and of course now that it’s almost here, he gets a call from the grid controller in Kyiv. They can’t lower the power for another ten hours. As frustrated as that makes them, they’ll have to delay the test. Dyatlov says he’s not worried about it. He’ll just go home to get some sleep and come back in the night to oversee the test personally.

I couldn’t find anything in my research to suggest this specific conversation took place, but the dialogue sets up some things that were very real.

It is true that promotions were in store for many of the characters we see in the series. There were talks of Bryukhanov being promoted. That would mean he’d leave Chernobyl and go to Moscow. That would also mean his role would need to be filled, and Nikolai Fomin was in line to do just that.

It’s also true that there was a delay in the test, although it was Nikolai Fomin who fielded the request to delay the test. If things had gone to plan, the test would’ve already been done by the time the weekend rolled around.

To fill in some historical context, the test they were running was simulating if the station lost power. They wanted to determine if a slowed turbine could provide enough electrical power to operate the core’s cooling water pumps for long enough until the diesel pumps came online.

They’d run the test a year earlier but the turbines weren’t able to hold power long enough, so in the meantime new voltage regulators had been developed. With those installed, it was time to run the test again.

There happened to be planned maintenance that would involve shutting down the reactor anyway, so they were trying to take advantage of that to run the test at low power.

The plan was to start shutting it down on Wednesday, April 23rd. But they pushed it back a day and decided to start shutting down the reactor beginning at 10:00 PM local time on Thursday, April 24th, 1986. The power would be down enough by the following morning, around 10:00 AM on Friday the 25th, to begin the test. That should only take a few hours, so everything should be done by 1:00 PM and Unit 4 would go into the weekend completely shutdown.

After Nikolai Fomin signed off on the plan, they started preparing for it. As it got closer to the time to start, they decided not to start at 10:00 PM after all because that would mean there’d be a shift change pretty much right as the test was getting started. So, instead, they decided to start it after the new shift came in around midnight.

Things were delayed a bit, but by the time 2:00 PM rolled around on Friday, the power had been dropped enough that they could finally start the test.

That’s when the call happened that we find out about in the series. A dispatcher at Kyiv’s electrical grid told them they couldn’t lower the power anymore. Since Chernobyl was providing power to Kyiv and it was Friday before a big holiday—May 1st was the May Day holiday—there was a lot of last-minute work as people were trying to hit their productivity quotas to get bonuses before the holiday. They weren’t allowed to go offline and begin the test until after 9:00 PM on Friday.

If we go back into the series, after that bit where we find out about the delay in the test, we fast forward to March of 1987 where the KGB Chairman Charkov threatens Valery Legasov. During the conversation, we find out Volkov was fired for, as Legasov puts it, “the crime of knowing.” If you remember from a previous episode, he was the guy who wrote the article that Ulana Kyomyuk found about the void coefficient issue.

Charkov tells Legasov that he needs to perform his duty to the State for the upcoming trial which, basically, means not talking about how the other reactors could do the same thing if they’re not fixed.

I couldn’t find anything to suggest this conversation took place in March of 1987, but the date of March is significant because that’s when the trial was supposed to take place. It ended up getting postponed to July, though, after Nikolai Fomin attempted suicide in his cell by cutting his wrists with shards of broken glass from his own glasses. The prison guards saved him, and the trial was postponed while he recovered.

As for the mention of someone being fired for “the crime of knowing”, it wasn’t just one person who was let go because of the disaster.

While there are likely a lot of people we don’t know about being let go, but we do know over 60 people who were fired or demoted in the aftermath of the disaster. And there were some high-ranking people in that mix, too.

So, it wouldn’t surprise me if Legasov’s job was in jeopardy at this point although, as the series suggests, he was also more of a public figure than many of the other scientists at the time because of his report to the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna.

Back in the series, now it’s July of 1987. We’re in the city of Chernobyl where it’s time for the trial of the three men in charge that night: Viktor Bryukhanov, Nikolai Fomin and Anatoly Dyatlov.

As a quick little side note, three other men were also arrested but they don’t make an appearance in the series at all so it makes sense why they don’t show up in the trial. Those other three men arrested in August of 1986 along with Bryukhanov, Fomin and Dyatlov were Boris Rogozkhin, who was the Shift Supervisor on the night of the 26th, as well as Yuri Laushkin, the safety inspector at Chernobyl, and Alexandr Kovalenko, who was the Manager of the Reactor Workshop and approved the test’s plans along with Bryukhanov and Fomin.

It is true, also, that the trial took place in the city of Chernobyl. The reason for that was because Soviet law required a trial take place near the crime. And the high radiation levels made a convenient excuse for why attendance had to be limited—which also meant they could control how much information got out. The last thing they wanted was for journalists and victims families to be there.

So, for the most part, the three-week trial was behind closed doors. Although, one impression I got from the series as I was watching it while we see Shcherbina and Legasov talking outside the building where the trial is being held is that the rest of the city is abandoned. While obviously many had been evacuated, the Chernobyl power plant was still in operation. So, many of the people working there at the time would sit in on the trial as their work schedule allowed.

Going back to the series now, we see the trial itself. Much of the trial ends up being Boris Shcherbina and then Valery Legasov explaining everything that happened.

And the HBO miniseries does a very good job of summarizing everything. We’ve talked a lot about what happened up until this point as we’ve seen things throughout this series, but before we dig into the timeline of what happened ourselves, the one key thing I want to point out about what we see in the trial is simply that we don’t really know everything that happened in the trial. The transcript of the trial has never been released.

There were people in attendance who took notes, but most of those were confiscated by the KGB. The most we’ve learned about the trial comes from Deputy Chief of the Nuclear Physics Laboratory at Chernobyl’s Nuclear Safety Department, a man named Nikolaii Karpan, who was allowed to keep his notes and published a book that included transcripts based on his notes. Others, such as Dyatlov himself, have talked about what happened after being released from prison. But, in both cases, the best we have is the recollection of people who were there and not any official transcripts.

From that, we know the trial was basically a show trial. The issue was entirely on the operators. The design wasn’t going to be at fault, because that would mean the Soviet system that allowed for lax safety standards was at fault, too.

With that said, as we are nearing the end of the overall series, now is a great time to do basically what the HBO miniseries does in the trial: Review everything that happened in the timeline it happened. But, of course, in the miniseries we only see things happening a little before, during and after the disaster.

The real history of the Chernobyl power plant starts in 1970.

That’s when a 35-year-old Viktor Bryukhanov visited the area for the first time. He had been appointed as Chernobyl’s Director and was tasked with building the power plant. The official name of the power plant, by the way, isn’t Chernobyl. That’s just what we know it by because it was located in the city of Chernobyl. The official name is the Vladimir I. Lenin Atomic Power Plant.

The nearby town of Pripyat was also built at the same time to house the 50,000 or so workers, support staff and their families.

The location was chosen primarily because it was not too far from Kyiv, where it would provide power. It was also close to a huge river where it could pull water for cooling and a pre-existing railway line.

There were already RBMK reactors in the Soviet Union, and they were chosen for Chernobyl as well because it was the cheapest to create the most amount of power while also being the safest—or so they thought.

Four reactors were built initially and in November of 1977, the first reactor was ready for operation. Unit 2 went online in 1978 while Unit 3 was ready in 1981.

In September of 1982, there was a partial meltdown in Unit 1 because of a faulty cooling valve. No one even noticed it happened until a few hours later and it was covered up for the public until 1985. They just fixed the reactor and put it back into operation about eight months later. Also in 1983, they focused on getting Unit 4 up and running. It went into operation on December 20th, 1983. Everyone was excited about the news of all four reactors were running.

In 1984, there were “emergency situations” in both Unit 3 and Unit 4 that only came to light in 2021 when Ukraine declassified some KGB documents about it. We still don’t have all the details about the full extent of everything that happened.

And that brings us to April of 1986.

At 1:00 AM on April 25th, they started reducing the power at Unit 4 in preparation for the safety test.

By 2:00 PM, the emergency cooling system for the core was disabled to keep it from interfering with the test. At this point, Unit 4 was operating at about 50% of its normal power.

About 15 minutes before they were to begin the actual shutdown of the reactor, the call came in from the grid controller at Kyiv. They were ordered not to lower the power anymore until after the peak hours were over. The operators at Chernobyl didn’t know it at the time, but the reason for this last-minute request was because of another nuclear power plant had a unit go offline unexpectedly. So, the power at Chernobyl was needed to keep Kyiv from losing power.

Without much to do, they waited. The emergency cooling system was already turned off and that was a process that took at least 45 minutes to turn it off or on, so they decided not to turn it back on again since they’d just be turning it back off again in a few hours. So, the reactor stayed at 50% power from 3,200 MWt (megawatt thermal) to 1,600 MWt for another nine hours while they waited for permission to continue.

They couldn’t perform the test until the reactor was down to 700 MWt.

Around 4:00 PM, there was a shift change. The evening shift leader, a man named Yurii Trehub who we don’t see in the series at all, wasn’t familiar with the test at all. He didn’t have to be, it was supposed to have been over by 1:00 PM before his shift even started. What could he do? He walked into his shift to find the reactor at half power with the core’s emergency cooling system turned off—that last bit came as a surprise to him. He also didn’t have permission to continue. The test had been postponed, not canceled, he was told. So, he made use of his time by studying up on the test plans.

At 8:00 PM, Trehub started to get worried that he hadn’t heard anything yet. So, he made a phone call and was told to wait until Anatoly Dyatlov came in. And Dyatlov, in turn, wasn’t planning on arriving at the plant until they’d received word from the dispatcher at Kyiv that they could proceed.

Around 9:00 PM, that call came. They could proceed with the shutdown starting at 10:00 PM. Trehub called Dyatlov to let him know, but found out from Dyatlov’s wife who answered that he was already on his way.

At 11:00 PM, Trehub started to get worried that Dyatlov hadn’t arrived yet. But without cell phones like we have today, there wasn’t a lot he could do. He got a call from someone in Unit 3 to let him know Dyatlov had stopped off there first.

By 11:10 PM, Dyatlov had arrived in Unit 4’s control room and Trehub began the next step: Reducing the reactor’s power levels even further.

At midnight, there was another shift change. Yurii Trehub, who didn’t expect to be involved in the test only to arrive to find out he was going to have to, was replaced at the controls by Alexandr Akimov. As part of the shift change, Leonid Toptunov also started his shift.

Just as had happened with Trehub, Akimov and Toptunov expected everything to already be done by the time they started their shift. They expected an easy shift with a reactor that had already been shut down. Instead, they arrived just in time to finish the program. With the shift change and others who wanted to monitor the test, there were 20 people in the control room at this point.

Like Trehub, Akimov wasn’t familiar with what he should be doing so he was furiously trying to read up on it and get advice from the others in the room like Trehub, who had spent most of his shift reading up on it. Trehub didn’t leave, he wanted to see how the test would go so he was there to answer questions. Although, he only had one shift of reading up on the test so he had plenty of his own questions about what should be done. In some ways it was the blind leading the blind.

Meanwhile, Dyatlov wasn’t interested in answering questions and was pushing Akimov to work faster instead of reading the instructions.

Toptunov continued adding control rods into the reactor, slowing down the nuclear reaction. The power continued to drop from 1,600 MWt to 520 MWt. All of a sudden, an emergency alarm went off. The supply of water had dropped below acceptable levels. Toptunov wasn’t sure what to do, but Trehub hopped in and started checking on the power levels. Then, Akimov noticed the power levels had dropped way too far and were continuing to drop. Toptunov had accidentally switched the control rods regulators out of order and that had caused a massive dropoff in the power levels.

Although they were wanting to shut down the reactor for its routine maintenance, the turbine test they were performing had to be done at 760 MWt power, so they’d let the power drop way too low.

At 12:28 AM on Saturday the 26th, the computer indicated the reactor’s power level was at just 30 MWt.

Akimov and Toptunov began removing control rods to help increase the reaction and bring the power levels back up. By 12:32 AM, the power had increased to 160 MWt, then 200 MWt.

At this point, they had a decision to make.

Either they could abandon the test and continue shutting things down for the maintenance or they could raise the power for the turbine test. Some people in the control room that night would later say they saw Akimov and Dyatlov arguing over the decision. Ultimately, Dyatlov was the most senior person in the room and he insisted on moving forward with the test. Instead of raising the power, though, Dyatlov decided they’d keep the reactor stable at 200 MWt and do the test that way instead of trying to raise it to the planned 760 MWt.

At 12:43 AM, Dyatlov ordered the operators to turn off the emergency signal from the two turbines that would be involved in the test.

At 1:03 AM and then 1:07 AM, two reserve pumps were activated to increase the flow of water. This was just part of the test—but of course, the test was supposed to be run at 760 MWt and not 200 MWt. Because of the lower power, the reactor became more unstable. At 1:19 AM, another alarm sounded. This was for low steam pressure. Because they’d introduced more water, that slowed the reaction down even further. Water absorbs neutrons and slows the reaction more than steam does. They turned off that alarm as well as the pumps.

Meanwhile, what they didn’t know, was the reactor running at such low power meant there was a byproduct of nuclear fission accumulating in the fuel rods. Xenon-135 is an unstable isotope that can have a huge effect on the reactor. It’s called xenon poisoning for a reason because it’s basically poisoning the core.

That made it extremely difficult for them to maintain even 200 MWt. To counteract this, Toptunov kept removing the control rods to keep the power levels from falling further. By 1:22 AM, only nine of the 167 control rods were in the core.

At that time, the reaction started to pick up.

This wasn’t intentional but was a result of the pumps being shut down. That meant there was less water cooling the reactor, so as the water reached boiling it turned into steam. As we just learned a moment ago, steam doesn’t absorb neutrons as much as water does. So that means with an increased amount of steam and less water, the nuclear reaction was rising. And fast.

Toptunov reported this to Akimov, but he didn’t really pay attention to it. He was too focused on starting the turbine test. That was supposed to start in a few seconds.

At 1:23:04 AM, the command was given to start the oscillograph, marking the beginning of the turbine test. By 1:23:40 AM, things were out of control.

The steam wasn’t absorbing enough neutrons, there were too many voids in the steam—we learned what a positive void coefficient means in the last episode—and there simply weren’t enough control rods in the core to slow down the reaction. The power was rising way too fast. Uncontrollably fast.

Realizing things were spiraling, Akimov ordered Toptunov to press AZ-5, the emergency shutdown of the reactor. That would insert all the control rods to stop the nuclear reaction. Except, if you recall from previous episodes, we learned the control rods in RBMK reactors like those in Unit 4 were tipped with graphite. That meant before slowing the reaction, they actually accelerated it as the graphite tips hit the water that had been absorbing neutrons.

That quick rise in heat was enough to cause some of the fuel rods to fracture.

The fuel rods, in turn, caused the control rods to get jammed so they couldn’t be inserted fully. That basically meant the only part sticking into the core was the graphite tips. The neutron-absorbing boron that was supposed to slow the reaction was ineffective. Instead, the graphite tips were continuing to increase the reaction. The control rods were having the opposite effect that was intended.

Pushing the AZ-5 button wasn’t the end. Instead, it was basically like pushing a self-destruct button.

The amount of power that they’d struggled to keep at 200 MWt for the test shot up to more than 30,000 MWt within a few seconds. The fuel rods broke down entirely, feeding the reaction further. The temperature rose even more, boiling the cooling water and turning it into so much steam that the core simply wasn’t designed to contain.

At 1:23:44, the steam exploded. That explosion tore apart the lines running coolant into the core. This even further accelerated the reaction.

At 1:23:46, two seconds later, there was another explosion. That was the explosion that destroyed the core and threw the core’s radioactive graphite blocks all over the place.

Inside the control room, they didn’t know what had happened. But we learned about that more in-depth when we saw it take place in the first episode, so I won’t repeat that story here.

Around this time it’s assumed the explosion caused the first death: Valery Khodemchuk, who was working in the part of the building that collapsed. They never found his body.

At 1:26:03, the fire alarm went off, calling in the fire department to deal with the fire. Under ten minutes later, they were fighting the fires on the roof.

A lot of these things we learned about in earlier episodes, but I’ll give the recap for the sake of the timeline.

Dyatlov was trying to continue to feed cooling water into the reactor. He didn’t know it had exploded. He didn’t believe it could explode. Nothing in any of their training had suggested that could be the case. There were even some who said RBMK reactors were so safe they could be installed in Red Square in Moscow without any harm.

Bryukhanov was called at 2:00 AM to let him know about the accident.

By 2:15 AM, an emergency meeting was called by Pripyat city officials. They still didn’t know the extent of the damage, but they decided to block anyone from coming or going from the city. To do that, they’d need help so the call is put out for police and military assistance.

Around 3:00 AM, Bryukhanov calls his boss, Vladimir Marin, to report the situation. He reported the explosion was at 1:21 AM. Later, he’d report the firefighters had extinguished the flames by 3:30 AM.

In truth, more firefighters arrived around 4:00 AM to combat the flames. At this time, everyone still believed the reactor was intact and they were trying to extinguish the fires before they affected the core.

Meanwhile, in Moscow, news of the accident had reached Antanolii Maiorets, the Minister of Energy. He started trying to get updates on the situation to feed to his boss, Boris Shcherbina. The typical protocol for any accident would be for a commission to be formed to look into the cause. Shcherbina was in charge of that commission.

Around 5:00 AM, a deputy minister surprised others in the city meeting by saying he had already ordered 1,100 buses to come to Pripyat just in case of an evacuation. No one wanted to evacuate. That would admit something more serious and insight a panic.

Back in the reactor, they were continuing to try and feed water into the core. They thought perhaps the water wasn’t getting into the core because of blocked valves. So, they spent hours trying to fix that, manually turning valves and checking things.

Around this time is when the second victim was killed. Vladimir Sashenok was an Automatic Systems Adjuster who was found unconscious in ankle-deep radioactive water. He’d been pinned under a beam in Room 604 after the explosion and was now unconscious, radioactive burns all over his body. They managed to rescue him, at great cost to the two men who pulled him out, but Sashenok he died at the hospital around 6:00 AM.

He had just celebrated his 35th birthday four days earlier.

By 6:35 AM, nearly all the fires had been extinguished. The only fires left were those inside Unit 4. There were 186 firefighters working on the flames now.

Around 9:00 AM, the first of the commission into the accident began to leave Moscow for Pripyat. Maiorets left around 4:00 PM. When he arrived in Pripyat, he went to look at the reactor and was in shock. This was worse than the reports indicated. Although they didn’t realize it at the time, that first-hand look at the damage caused Maiorets and those with him to absorb massive amounts of radiation.

Even though people were seeing graphite scattered about, some of them thought it came from Unit 5—they were planning on expanding the Chernobyl plant to go from four reactors to six. But when they checked on that graphite, it was still intact. So they were at a loss to know where the graphite came from, their minds simply not being able to comprehend Unit 4’s core exploded.

Then, Bryukhanov joined the city commission meeting around 11:00 AM. Time and time again, Bryukhanov was told not to panic. The commission from the government will be here soon and they’ll decide what to do.

Early in the afternoon, two other nuclear experts from Moscow arrived by the names of Boris Prushinsky and Konstantin Polushkin. Arguably, those two men had more experience on RBMK reactors than anyone else on the commission. The first thing they wanted to do was to see the damage with their own eyes from the air. So, they did just that—after lunch, of course.

When they saw the damage, they knew the reactor had exploded. No one could deny that anymore.  

That evening, Boris Shcherbina and Valery Legasov arrived in Pripyat a little after 8:00 PM. Maiorets and others were already meeting when they arrived. The news of the exploded reactor was a surprise, but it was undeniable. It also meant they were entering unknown territory. No one knew what to do. They had to come up with ideas.

Also in Pripyat around this time, townspeople were gathering on what’s now known as the bridge of death. They were watching all the flames and glow in the night sky over the plant. They didn’t know it was burning graphite they were looking at, or that the wind over them was blowing a lethal dose of radiation. No one on that bridge survived.

At about midnight on Sunday, April 27th, buses began to arrive at Pripyat. Around this time, too, General Nikolai Antoshkin arrived in Pripyat. Like many who arrived soon after the explosion, he wasn’t entirely sure what he was walking into. When he got there, Shcherbina told him they needed helicopters.

An hour later, Unit 1 was shut down while Unit 2 stopped around 2:00 AM.

At 7:00 AM was when General Pikalov drove the truck to get a more accurate radiation reading. There was no doubt then…the graphite was still burning and radiation was still being given off.

One of the things they decided in the commission meeting was to try to stop the burning reactor by dropping sand and other things from helicopters. Shcherbina had already ordered the assistance of military helicopters from Antoshkin and those started to arrive on Sunday morning. There were about 80 of them so far, with more on the way.

Also on Sunday morning, Shcherbina made the decision to evacuate Pripyat. But he didn’t quite give the order yet, he wanted to see the damage at Unit 4 first-hand. Along with Legasov, General Pikalov, General Antoshkin and a few others, they flew a helicopter over the reactor to see the damage.

Although others had seen it in the daylight before, this was the first time many of those in the helicopter saw it from the air in the daylight and it quickly became apparent this was not a minor thing. This would have global implications.

The order to evacuate Pripyat came at 10:00 AM on Sunday morning. The buses rolled in and, at about 1:00 PM, the announcement was made to the people of Pripyat telling them to evacuate.

You can hear a bit of that when we learned about it in episode number two of this series.

A line of buses stretching 12 kilometers, or about 7.5 miles, along with the nearby trains and boats on the river were used to evacuate a majority of the 50,000 or so men, women and children living in Pripyat at the time. Some stayed behind to help with the emergency services.

About that same time on Sunday morning and continuing through May 1st, the helicopters started dropping the mixture they’d hope would smother the fire and stop the nuclear reaction. Looking at this from a historical lens, we now know that almost none of the neutron-absorbing boron reached the core.

On Monday the 28th, some other countries started detecting the dangerous radioactivity. The staff at a nuclear power plant in Sweden noticed increased radioactivity during a routine check of their shoes. Then in Denmark, the announcement was made of an accident at the Chernobyl nuclear reactor.

On Tuesday the 29th, American satellites took photographs of Chernobyl and saw the roof was gone and it was still smoking. Something had obviously gone wrong.

On April 30th, an official statement declares that two people died during the accident— Khodemchuk and Sashenok—and another 197 have been hospitalized. But, it’s okay, their radiation levels are under control and going down.

May 1st was a holiday: May Day. As fate would have it, the wind changed direction and blew the radiation toward the largest town nearby, Kyiv. But still, the annual parades and celebrations continued in Kyiv and Minsk. Everything is normal. Meanwhile, at this point, any of the Soviet elite who had family in the area had already secretly told them to leave.

On May 2nd is when the three men volunteered to turn the valves for the sluice gates that would avoid another potential explosion. We learned more about this in episodes two and three of the series.

The construction workers also started the project of digging under Unit 3 with the purpose of building a liquid nitrogen heat exchanger under Unit 4. We also learned about this in episode three.

On May 9th, Vladimir Pravik became one of the first to die from acute radiation sickness. He was one of the first firefighters who arrived on the scene right after the explosion and was set to celebrate his 24th birthday just a few days later.

On May 10th, the senior reactor operator that night, Alexandr Akimov, succumbed to his radiation burns and died.

On May 14th, Leonid Toptunov died. He was another operator that we see heavily featured in the HBO miniseries.

On May 27th, the idea of a concrete structure to cover the exposed reactor is devised. It’s what we now know as the sarcophagus.

Another problem arose, though, because the power from the Chernobyl plant was still very much needed. So, on September 29th, Unit 1 was started back up. Soon after that, on October 10th, the construction resumed on Units 5 and 6. On November 9th, Unit 2 restarted.

Restarting Unit 3 was delayed, however, because if you recall from earlier episodes we learned that Unit 3 and Unit 4 were connected.

Work on the sarcophagus began on December 14th, 1986. They used 300,000 tons of concrete and 6,000 tons of metal to build an encasing structure over Unit 4. It was designed as a relatively short-term solution for the next two or three decades.

It wasn’t until April 21st, 1987 that Unit 3 was powered back up. Three days later, they decided to stop construction on Units 5 and 6.

In 1991 there was another disaster, this time in Unit 2. A fire broke out because of a defective switch. That ignited some insulation that then led to a leak of hydrogen. The roof collapsed and Unit 2 was decommissioned.

Another major event happened in 1991: The fall of the Soviet Union.

Not to get too far ahead of our timeline here, but a 2006 interview with Mikhail Gorbachev is relevant to our story today when he quoted as saying: “The nuclear meltdown at Chernobyl 20 years ago this month, even more than my launch of Perestroika, was perhaps the real cause of the collapse of the Soviet Union five years later.”

In December of 2000, Unit 3 was shut down, marking the final reactor being shutdown at the Chernobyl power plant.

Then, in June of 2003, a replacement for the original sarcophagus was announced. Named the New Safe Confinement, the plan was to build something that would last a lot longer than the original structure. Construction didn’t begin until September of 2010, and it was completed in 2019.

The New Safe Confinement should contain the radioactivity in Unit 4 for at least the next hundred years…

…that is, if everything goes according to plan.

The post 251: Chernobyl Part 5 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/251-chernobyl-part-5/feed/ 0 8561
249: Chernobyl Part 4 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/249-chernobyl-part-4/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/249-chernobyl-part-4/#respond Wed, 17 May 2023 11:00:00 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=8567 HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the fourth episode in the miniseries called The Happiness of All Mankind. See the sources Full Chernobyl Series Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one! Buy me a coffee Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based […]

The post 249: Chernobyl Part 4 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the fourth episode in the miniseries called The Happiness of All Mankind.

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

A soldier is trying to get a woman to evacuate the radiation area.

She refuses. She says she’s 82, and has lived here her whole life.

Why do I care if it’s safe or not?

She says she was 12 when the Revolution came. Czar’s men, then Bolsheviks. They told us to leave. Then there was Stalin and his famine, the Holodomor. My parents died and two of my sisters died. They told the rest of us to leave. No.

Then the Great War. German boys. Russian boys. More soldiers. More famine. More bodies.

So, I should leave now because of something I cannot see at all? No.

While I couldn’t find anything in my research to suggest this introductory sequence was based on a specific person, what it depicts was something that’s very real. For one, not everyone wanted to leave the area. That’s probably not too surprising, it’s still common for people to not want to leave their homes when natural disasters like hurricanes are bearing down on them.

Being 82 years old means she’s talking about a revolution 70 years before the time period of the series. Since that time period is 1986, 70 years earlier was 1916.

That’s close enough to the Russian Revolution in 1917, so I’m going to guess that’s the revolution she’s referring to. There’s way too much to cover in this episode about that, but in a nutshell, the Russian government wasn’t doing well during World War I—which was from 1914 to 1918. In February of 1917, there was a revolution in Russia that basically ended with Czar Nicholas II abdicating the throne. That ended about 300 years of the Romanov Dynasty ruling over Russia since 1613 with the first Czar, Ivan the Terrible.

So, the government changed from a monarchy to…well, kind of chaos for a while, until in September Russia was declared a democratic republic. That didn’t last long, though, because in October of 1917, there was another revolution that saw Vladimir Lenin’s Bolshevik Party take power.

So, that’s why the lady was talking about the Czar’s men and then the Bolsheviks.

She also mentioned Stalin’s famine, the Holodomor. We learned more about that when we learned about the movie Bitter Harvest back on episode #40 and again with insights from the screenwriter of the movie in episode #57 of Based on a True Story.

That was a man-made famine in 1932 and 1933 when the Soviet Union, led by Joseph Stalin, forced unrealistic grain quotas that led to the famine. Since Ukraine was one of the largest grain-producing states in the USSR, they were hit especially hard. We don’t know the exact amount of people who died, but estimations range between 3.5 and 10 million people, most of them in Ukraine. Today, Ukraine recognizes Holodomor as a genocide carried out by the Soviet regime.

The next thing mentioned by the woman is the Great War with German and Russian soldiers. Even though a lot of people referred to World War I as the Great War, I don’t think that’s what she was talking about. World War I was taking place at the same time as the revolution she mentioned at the very beginning. Then, she seems to go in order of historical events, so mentioning the Great War at the end would be after Holodomor in the early 1930s. That makes me think she’s talking about World War II.

During World War II, the Germans occupied much of Ukraine after Operation Barbarossa when the Germans invaded. While Chernobyl technically existed, it wasn’t until the 1970s when it was picked for the nuclear power plant. So there weren’t a lot of residents in the area during World War II. Most of the residents at that time were Jewish and with the Germans invading and occupying the area until 1943, sadly that means most of them were murdered in the Holocaust.

Perhaps the most well-known incident happened at Babi Yar, a ravine located just outside Kyiv and about 133 kilometers or 82 miles away from Chernobyl. It was there on September 29th and 30th in 1941 that the Nazis murdered 33,371 Jews in one of the first massacres of the war. Throughout the war, the location was used for continual murdering by the Nazis so much so that by the end of the war it’s estimated between 100,000 and 150,000 Jews, Roma, Soviet prisoners and others were murdered there.

For the purposes of our story today, I think it’s moving to hear how it’s possible for a single person, like the woman in the beginning of this episode, to have lived through so many horrors and atrocities. And after seeing so many horrible things, now she’s supposed to run away because of something she can’t even see? We can understand why some would be hesitant.

Back in the series, we see a time and place on the screen. It’s August of 1986 in Kyiv. That’s four months after the explosion. Lyudmilla Ignatenko enters a building with another lady. There’s not a lot of explanation here, but it looks like she’s moving into an apartment.

The impression I got from the series, though, was that people from Pripyat were relocated to Kyiv. Granted, we don’t see any of the other people from Pripyat relocating, we only see Lyudmilla entering a new, or at least an empty, apartment. But then again the series focused more on Lyudmilla and Vasily than it did other townspeople in Pripyat.

In either case, what we do know from history is that after the town of Pripyat was evacuated everyone was moved elsewhere. A city named Slavutych was built just for the evacuees of Pripyat. It’s located about 30 miles, or 45 kilometers, from Pripyat.

However, with that said, in the timeline of the series no one was living in Slavutych yet. Construction on that city started in October of 1986 and the first residents didn’t move in until 1988. And because the evacuation of Pripyat happened on April 27th, 1986, a day after the explosion, the residents had to stay somewhere in the interim.

If we go back to the series, one of the most heart-wrenching sequences happens next. It’s when three soldiers, Pavel, Bacho and Garo, go around the now-abandoned city and shoot any animals they find. Most of them are loveable pets who were left behind in the evacuation and are just excited to see a human again. There’s one especially sad scene where Pavel comes across a dog with her puppies in a house. They’re so cute! But, they must be killed to avoid spreading radiation. They’ve been ordered to shoot the animals while others are digging up the ground and others still are cutting down trees.

This is all a part of the cleanup effort, trying to get rid of any radiation on the plants and the top of the ground, as well as killing any poisoned animals before they spread the radiation further or die horrific deaths themselves because of the radiation poisoning.

While I couldn’t find anything in my research to suggest things happened exactly like we see in the series with Pavel, Bacho and Garo, the essence of what we’re seeing here is true.

There were about forty men who took to the streets to hunt the pets. They weren’t keen on going to the radiation zone at first since they weren’t given anything to protect themselves against the radiation, but they did what they had to do.

At first, the pets did exactly like we see them doing in the series as they’d run up to the people. Then they’d scatter at the sound of the guns. Before long, many of the animals stopped trusting the humans and it got more difficult to find them.

That scene with the dog and puppies? It happened. More than once. In the bookVoices From Chernobyl, one of the hunters recounts the story of finding a dog with her puppies and how he shot them one-by-one. There’s a story of an older lady who had shut herself in her house instead of evacuating. She had three dogs and five cats, and the men forced most of them away from her despite her screams and protests. They left one cat and a dog.

All the animals were collected and buried in mass graves. The graves were supposed to be lined with plastic or protected in some way to keep the bodies from decomposing into the groundwater—kind of like what we heard happened to Vasily Ignatenko. But, that didn’t happen for the pets. They were put in the ground and covered with dirt. Most of the time they were already dead. One of the hunters recalled an instance where a dog was only injured, but they didn’t have any bullets to kill it. So they buried it alive.

Before the evacuation, everyone was told they’d be back within a few days. For two months, the hunters drove around the streets taking out the household pets. Horses were put down. But not necessarily all the animals were killed. One of the hunters recalls they left the pigs alive. Otters they let free so they could swim away in a nearby river.

It must have been devastating to have to do that.

While not as prominent in the series, we do see some of the other cleanup effort: Cutting down trees, digging up the earth, and so on.

All that happened, too, but of course there is more to the story than we see in the series.

For 30 kilometers, that’s about 18 miles, around the Chernobyl power plant the military was in charge of cleanup. Houses, cars, buildings, roads, trees, literally everything was deemed contaminated and needed to be cleaned.

To do this, they’d first spray things down. We saw some of that in the series, too. Something else we see is helicopters dropping something on the trees. While I was watching that, I wasn’t sure exactly what the liquid was for. There wasn’t a fire, so it’s not like when they drop water to put out wildfires. So, I thought perhaps it was to kill the trees to make them easier to chop down. After researching it more, I was wrong.

What they dropped from helicopters was a liquid solution they called “water soup.” The purpose of that wasn’t to decontaminate or kill or do anything other than to be a liquid that would make anything radioactive adhere to the surface.

Imagine you’re going down a dirt road, the dust gets kicked up and then settles somewhere else.

This process was similar. They wanted to avoid any radioactive or anything getting kicked up by the next phase of the cleanup.

That next phase involved spraying a special decontaminating agent on anything and everything: Grass, plants, cars, mechanical equipment, houses, any structures, pretty much everything. If something was beyond decontamination, it’d be destroyed or buried. Entire buildings and structures were buried to limit the continued contamination. And that last part, especially, would certainly kick up plenty of radioactive material and things you don’t want flying around as you’re trying to clean up in the area.

An entire forest was cut down, too. It was about 10 square kilometers, or a little under 4 square miles, so not a huge forest—but enough to be a big job. That was nicknamed the Red Forest because the trees were so affected by the radiation from explosion that they actually turned red.

If we go back into the series, Ulana Khomyuk is continuing her investigation into what happened. She pulls some documents from the KGB archive—it got redacted some before she was allowed access to it—and after Anatoly Dyatlov refused to talk to her in the last episode, this time he’s finally willing to talk. Khomyuk brings the document.

In their dialogue, we find out the document is from 1976 and it talks about RBMK reactors under extreme conditions. They forgot to redact the table of contents, though, so Khyomuk points out some of the pages they did redact are talking about a positive void coefficient and the AZ-5 button. That seems to be of interest because they pressed the AZ-5 button and then the reactor exploded.

Dyalov says void coefficients have nothing to do with AZ-5 and then tells her that she’s looking for answers, but even the right question won’t find the truth. There is no truth. You’ll only get lies in return for your questions and I’ll get the bullet.

As we’ve learned throughout this series, Khomyuk is a fictional character so of course the specifics of this scene are made up. But this brings up a great point, because even though we’ve learned what the AZ-5 button was already, there’s a new term the HBO miniseries talks about here that we haven’t explained in our own series yet: Void coefficients.

What are they and was Dyaltov correct in the series to talk about how they have nothing to do with the AZ-5 button?

To start, a void coefficient isn’t unique to the reactors at Chernobyl. A void coefficient is just a way of measuring how the reactor changes as voids are introduced. The voids are things like steam bubbles in the water. And the measurement is basically to know if the void coefficient is positive or negative. If it’s negative, that means it’ll be less reactive and if it’s positive it’ll be more reactive.

For an RBMK reactor type, the void coefficient is extremely positive. So that’s why it needed to be monitored closely.

How about the idea of the void coefficient having nothing to do with AZ-5?

That’s not entirely true, but that doesn’t mean the series is wrong when it suggests Dyatlov thought it was true at the time. If you’ve listened to the first few episodes in this series you’ll know there was nothing in the training on RBMK reactors in the Soviet Union at the time to suggest anything otherwise.

However, looking at this from a historical perspective, we know that’s not true. We talked about this before so I won’t go in-depth explaining what AZ-5 does again, but the reason it’s not true has to do with the design of the control rods because they’re tipped with graphite.

Going back to the series, there’s another date on the screen. It’s September of 1986, and they’re still trying to clear the roof of debris. Boris Shcherbina makes some calls and gets a police robot nicknamed “Joker” from West Germany.

After lowering the robot to the roof of the reactor by helicopter, we see Shcherbina and Valery Legasov in the control room with a bunch of monitors. They decide to start by testing the robot’s functions. Good signal. Motors are good. Move one meter forward, all good. Okay, now let’s go one meter backward, all goo—uh…wait a second. It just died. In the control room, all the buttons go from green to red. Is that the signal? No, the signal is fine. There’s so much radiation the robot itself died.

That’s all true, although there’s more to the story that we don’t see in the series.

The plan wasn’t one that Shcherbina or Legasov came up with themselves, but rather it came from technicians at the Ministry of Energy.

Joker was a real vehicle they bought from West Germany. It was specifically designed to handle radioactive material, and the plan was to use it alongside two other rovers that were developed for the Soviet lunar exploration program. They didn’t want to pick anything up and move it elsewhere since that’d just create another contaminated site they’d need to deal with. Instead, they wanted to do exactly like we see in the series: Push the radioactive debris off the roof and back into where the core of Unit 4 used to be. That way they could lower the radioactivity enough to build a roof over the whole thing to seal it off.

That was the plan.

Just like we see in the series, Joker and the other rovers weren’t up to the task. They all failed. It was back to the drawing board.

The date was September 16th when the commission met in Shcherbina’s office to decide what to do next. They had to clean the rooftops if they ever wanted to build a huge metal and concrete roof—something they called a sarcophagus—over the whole thing to seal it off. It was just too dangerous to build if the rooftops weren’t cleared of radioactive materials first.

And their attempts at using remote vehicles failed miserably.

There was only one option left to clean up the radioactivity too dangerous for machines to do. Everyone in the room knew what that meant. Humans had to do it.

Back in the series, we see text on the screen saying it’s October, 1986. General Tarakanov gives a bunch of soldiers instructions for how they’re going to clean it up. Russia needs it done. You’ll have 90 seconds to solve the problem. Enter through the reactor building #3 and climb the stairs to the roof. When you get to the top, wait for a moment to catch your breath.

When you enter the work area, look for the graphite. Some of the blocks might be 40 to 50 kilograms—that’s about 90 to 110 pounds—and it all must be thrown over the edge in a specific spot. He points to a photo of the roof, showing where they’re to throw the graphite over so it lands in Unit 4.

After 90 seconds, a bell will ring and you’ll return immediately. Go back down the stairs for decontamination.

And not to get too far ahead of our story today, but at the end of the episode we see Tarakanov thanking what he says are “the last of 3,828 men.”

This recreation of how the cleanup process went is pretty accurate!

Although, it didn’t start in October like the series suggests. It also didn’t end after December like the series implies by showing that scene with Tarakanov at the end. That scene comes after we see text on the screen with the date of December, 1986 and a conversation between Shcherbina, Legasov and Khomyuk. We’ll get to that conversation in a minute.

In reality, the cleanup operation started just three days after the decision was made to use humans, or bio-robots as the planners called them. As we learned a moment ago, that decision was made on September 16th.

We don’t see this at all in the series, but before anyone went onto the roof to clean things up someone had to go up there to do a test. To figure out the plan, basically. That was done by a radiologist in the Army Medical Corps who wore protective gear that included pieces made from hastily torn down lead from the walls of government offices in Chernobyl, along with ten different dosimeters to monitor the radiation levels. He sprinted across the roof of Unit 3 and threw five shovelfuls of graphite over the edge to the remains of Unit 4 before sprinting back.

He was on the roof for 73 seconds. In that time, he absorbed 15 rem, which is three times what the U.S. federal government considers to be safe to be absorbed in an entire year.

General Tarakanov was a real person, and he was in charge of the soldiers tasked with doing the cleanup. He gave each soldier the chance not to go. There were some who didn’t want to go, but they also recognized they were the last chance. If they didn’t do it, no one else would. In the end, no one refused to go.

On the afternoon of September 19th, the first wave of soldiers began the bulk of the work. It was work that lasted for 12 hours a day and for 12 days, until October 1st. They were armed with shovels, rakes, wooden stretchers to carry larger pieces of graphite and sledgehammers to break out pieces that had been melted into the bitumen.

The time of 90 seconds we see in the series is a simplification. They were trying to limit each person’s exposure to no more than 25 rem, but they did use a bell or a siren when the time was up. Each soldier’s contribution was meticulously logged.

One person threw down three pieces of graphite weighing up to 200 kilograms, or about 440 pounds. Another threw down seven pipes weigh up to 30 kilograms, or 67 pounds.

Each soldier was only supposed to go on the roof once, but some went again.

At the end of the cleanup operation on the roof of Unit 3, just like we see in the series, there were three men who climbed to the top of the chimney to raise a red flag. That was done to signal the cleanup was finished. There are photographs of the men attaching the flag to the top of the chimney of taken by war photographer Igor Kostin that I’ll include in the resources for this episode over on the show’s website.

As a quick little side note, Kostin was one of the few photographers to document the accident. His photographs are some of the only surviving images of Unit 4 just a few hours after the explosion. Many of his photos didn’t survive due to the radiation while others were so heavily affected by it that the radiation itself is visible in the film. I’d highly recommend you look at his photographs to get a good idea of what an absolute mess the whole area was after the explosion.

If we go back to the series, it’s December of 1986 now. There’s a brief mention in the dialogue between Shcherbina, Legasov and Khomyuk about Legasov going to Vienna to speak to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Before he does that, Khomyuk wants to tell him what she’s discovered about what happened. She shows him the document she also showed to Dyatlov earlier in the episode. That’s the heavily redacted document that talks about a tie between the AZ-5 button and the void coefficient in RBMK reactors.

To her surprise, Legasov already seems to know about this.

He tells Khomyuk about an RBMK reactor in Leningrad back in 1975 that had a fuel channel rupture. The operators pressed AZ-5 and the power went up first before it went down.

In the series, Legasov mentions a colleague named Volkov wrote the article Khomyuk found. Vladimir Volkov was a real person, he was the head of the Kurchatov Institute’s RBMK safety research group.

As you already know, since the composite character of Khomyuk is involved in this, that’s not what really happened. But the idea of something happening in Leningrad in 1975 is real. And it didn’t have to be found by someone from the commission in some KGB archive, because someone who was there for the Leningrad accident was also at Chernobyl.

He’s not in the series at all, but Vitalii Borets was one of the most experienced nuclear engineers in the Soviet Union at the time. In November of 1975, he was working at the Chernobyl power plant when he took a business trip to Leningrad for some training at an RBMK reactor some 50 kilometers, or about 30 miles, outside the city.

On November 30th, he was stopping the reactor and shifting to another mode of operation when he noticed something was wrong. As the reactor slowed to a lower power level, inserting the control rods to slow the reaction didn’t slow the reaction like it was supposed to. In fact, it did the exact opposite: The nuclear reaction was increasing rapidly.

They managed to avoid an explosion by using the AZ-5 emergency shutdown, but not before one of the fuel channels melted releasing radiation into the air. We still don’t know exactly how that affected the people of Leningrad.

The issue had to do with the design of the control rods. They were six meters long, or just under 20 feet. Because of the graphite tips, when they were inserted into the core at a depth less than two meters, or about six and a half feet, they caused a spike in the reaction.

This issue as well as the incident at the Leningrad power plant was something the Soviet government kept under wraps. What they did do was to give orders to change the control rods in RBMK reactors in the Soviet Union to avoid the issue from happening again. Although they didn’t say why they were making the changes, so no one at Chernobyl really thought it was a big deal. It was just an order to make a change. And they did make the change in Unit 3 at Chernobyl, but they hadn’t gotten around to doing it yet in Unit 4.

However, because Borets happened to be there when it happened, he knew there could be an issue. Even he didn’t know the full extent of why it happened, only that it did. By the time 1986 rolled around, it was an incident that happened over ten years earlier so it wasn’t something that was on the top of his mind as he helped plan the test at Chernobyl.

After the explosion, of course, that was a different story.

Speaking of the story, there’s also more to the story of Legasov going to Vienna that we don’t see in the series. The timeline in the series is a bit off because it talks about Legasov going to Vienna during a conversation that supposedly happened in December of 1986. In truth, Legasov went to Vienna from August 25th to the 29th in 1986. He was the head of the Soviet Union’s delegation to explain to the International Atomic Energy Agency what had happened at Chernobyl.

While he was there, Legasov presented a report on the disaster and answered questions for over three hours from scientists of other countries. Of course, not all the details were included in the report. That report basically blamed operator error and left out the issues with the reactor design. Not only that, but the report was prohibited from being seen back in the Soviet Union. So, that meant there were people around the world who knew more about the disaster than those working on it.

Later, Legasov admitted to playing a part in the coverup of information when he said:

“I did not lie in Vienna, but I did not tell the full truth.”

The post 249: Chernobyl Part 4 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/249-chernobyl-part-4/feed/ 0 8567
247: Chernobyl Part 3 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/247-chernobyl-part-3/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/247-chernobyl-part-3/#respond Wed, 10 May 2023 11:00:00 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=8559 HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the third episode in the miniseries called Open Wide, O Earth. See the sources Full Chernobyl Series Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one! Buy me a coffee Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on […]

The post 247: Chernobyl Part 3 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the third episode in the miniseries called Open Wide, O Earth.

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

Episode number three starts with a continuation of what we saw at the end of the last episode. We’re in darkness with the three men submerged in radioactive water trying to turn the valves that’ll avoid an even worse disaster.

Unfortunately, their flashlights went out at the end of the last episode. In this one, they manage to get the lights working again and continue on. They also manage to find the valves and get them turned. In the next scene, we’re back above ground where the men are received with cheers and claps—the three men were successful. Finally, some good news!

That’s true.

Setting up the terrible disaster they were trying to avoid by going into the water was something they showed in the last episode—so that’s when we learned about that as well.

The three men aren’t listed in the credits for the HBO series with first names—they only have their last names: Ananenko, Bezpalov and Baranov.

Those were really the men who volunteered to go, but of course there’s more to the story than we see in the series.

Alexei Ananenko knew where the valves were located because he was a senior reactor mechanical engineer. Valery Bezpalov was a turbine engineer who was going to turn the second valve. And then Boris Baranov was a shift supervisor. He decided to go along with the other two men to both carry a flashlight for the others so they could see what they were doing as they used both hands to turn the valves—but he was also there in case of emergencies. He would rescue the other men and/or be the backup to turn a valve in case something happened.

The whole ordeal losing their light like we see in the series actually happened, too. Although they weren’t able to get the light working again as fast as we see in the series. Instead, once their light failed they had to feel their way in the darkness using the pipes to guide them to the valves.

Of course, that wouldn’t look good on screen since…well, pitch darkness doesn’t create good visuals. So, I can see why they changed that in the series.

The three men were told their families would be taken care of. I couldn’t find any sort of proof in my research to know if that happened or not. While the men were expecting to sacrifice their lives for what they’d done—spending a lot of time in highly radioactive water will do that—they all seemed to survive the ordeal much better than others. In one of the excellent books that I used during my research for this episode, called 01:23:40, the author, Andrew Leatherbarrow, mentions that he actually spoke with Alexei Ananenko in March of 2016, just before the first edition of Leatherbarrow’s book was published. Valery Bezpalov was still alive in June of 2019 while Boris Baranov died of a heart attack in 2005 at age 65.

So, all in all, considering what they volunteered for in 1986 all three men seem to have lived rather normal lives afterward.

If we go back into the series, even though they successfully avoided the thermal explosion thanks to the three men turning the valves, they’re far from being safe. The next major plot point happens as they’re trying to solve the issue of the meltdown burning its way through the platform under the reactor and into the earth. If it does that, the radioactive material will leak into the drinking water and poison it for everyone around.

To avoid that, the plan is to install a liquid nitrogen heat exchanger underneath the concrete pad. To do that in time before it burns through the concrete pad, they need to bring in more men. According to the series, 100 coal miners from Tula in Russian SSR are brought in to do this.

Valery Legasov and Boris Shcherbina tell the miner’s crew chief, a man named Andrei Glukhov, what the situation is. They don’t beat around the bush—this job involves digging underneath a nuclear reactor that is actively melting down. But if we don’t do it, the nearby river feeds into the primary water supply for about 50 million people. They could all be poisoned and lead to untold scores of deaths.

There are elements of truth to this, although there is more to the story that we don’t see.

For one, the character of Andrei Glukhov was not a crew chief at a coal mine in Tula. You can read more about the real Glukhov in Adam Higginbotham’s book Midnight in Chernobyl. Glukhov actually worked in the reactor’s physics laboratory at the Chernobyl power plant. He was a friend of Leonid Toptunov and in the morning hours of April 26th, just after the explosion, he called his friend to find out what happened. When he was finally able to get a hold of Toptunov, Glukhov asked about Unit 4. Toptunov told his friend that he had been told not to talk about it…but look out the window.

What of the miners we see in the series, then?

There was a plan to dig beneath the reactor in May. But it wasn’t the first plan after avoiding the threat of thermal explosion. The first idea the state commission had was to try and cool the melting reactor core from beneath. To do this, they’d pump in liquid hydrogen underneath the reactor.

But that didn’t work.

Not because the plan was a bad one necessarily, but the drilling crews couldn’t get close enough to Unit 4 because of the high levels of radiation. So that’s when they had the idea to drill horizontally from a safe area behind Unit 3.

That didn’t work either.

Again, it wasn’t because the plan was a terrible one, but this time it was an issue with the equipment. What they had available at the time couldn’t correctly build the entire frozen platform that would be needed to cool the reactor down. They could do parts here and there, but it wasn’t enough.

As a quick little side note here, one of the ways the HBO series oversimplifies things is by suggesting there were three people—Shcherbina, Legasov and Khomyuk—behind the ideas for how to solve a lot of the problems after the accident. We already learned there were hundreds of people involved and that’s especially relevant here as ideas for how to slow the meltdown were being bounced back and forth by scientists. It wasn’t just Valery Legasov coming up with ideas like the series suggests. In fact, many of the ideas that were proposed were ideas that Legasov didn’t like. For example, one of Legasov’s colleagues in the scientific community was a man named Yevgenii Velikhov, and he was the one to propose freezing the earth under the reactor and then building a concrete platform. Legasov wasn’t so sure of this idea.

But it is true there was an idea similar to what we see in the series: Build a concrete platform that could be cooled. To do that they needed to build a tunnel and then a chamber under the reactor for housing the freezing chamber that would be used to cool down the entire concrete platform.

As an added benefit, they planned on the platform being used to help support a structure over the entire reactor. They anticipated it would need to be built to keep radioactivity from escaping after the immediate threat of the continuing meltdown was solved.

To get this built, the series was correct to suggest there were people brought in from Tula. The series mentions in dialogue that there are 100 men who gather their equipment and get into trucks to head to Chernobyl…but that’s not the full story.

According to Serhii Plokhy’s Chernobyl book, over 230 miners came from the Donbas region as well as over 150 from Tula.

On top of that, because of the delicacy of the situation, the miners weren’t allowed to use heavy mechanical equipment they were accustomed to. The state committee didn’t want to risk the heavy equipment damaging the foundation in any way. That could lead to releasing radioactive elements into the ground.

What that meant for the workers was they basically had to dig things with shovels or in many cases, literally by hand. There was a lot of digging and pushing dirt with bare hands. The miners worked for three hours at a time and they did all this for free.

At least that’s what they thought. They did end up getting paid rather well for what they did, but they didn’t know about any special compensation at the time. That came later. At the time, all they knew was if they didn’t do it, no one would. They were doing a job they knew needed to be done to avoid poisoning the drinking water of millions of citizens.

Something else that sort of underscores the complexities of reality compared to the HBO miniseries—well, in the series, we see a bunch of miners arriving at Chernobyl on buses. In the true story, each miner was approved by the state committee before they could go to Chernobyl. But, of course, we can’t see everything in the series.

Speaking of which, if we go back to the series, we’re back at the hospital where some of the men at Chernobyl when the explosion happened are being treated. Men like Anatoly Dyatlov, Leonid Toptunov, and Alexandr Akimov.

Ulana Khomyuk visits the hospital to talk to get a picture of what happened in the control room that night.

At first Khomyuk tries to talk to Dyatlov, but he’s not in the mood to talk. So she goes to talk to Toptunov. During their conversation, Toptunov tells Khomyuk that the power level jumped from 200 to 400 megawatts super-fast. Khomyuk asks him why he didn’t press the AZ-5 button to initiate an emergency shutoff. Toptunov says he told Akimov about the increase and it was Akimov who pressed the AZ-5 button.

Then comes something that seems to shock Khomyuk.

Toptunov tells her that it was only after Akimov pressed the AZ-5 button that the reactor exploded.

That doesn’t make sense. Why would the reactor explode after the emergency shutoff button had been pressed? That’s the whole point of an emergency shutoff—to, you know, shut the reactor off in the event of an emergency. Haha!

Khomyuk verifies this and Toptunov repeats that’s what happened: The AZ-5 button was pushed by Akimov and then it exploded.

So, Khomyuk goes to talk to Akimov to get his side of things. He confirms it and tells Khomyuk that he pressed the AZ-5 button before the explosion. But he’s confused on why shutting it down didn’t work.

There are some elements of truth to that, but the specifics of what we’re seeing here are made up for the series. If you recall, the character of Ulana Khomyuk is a fictional one that’s intended to be an amalgamation of all the scientists who worked on the Chernobyl accident.

So, obviously, it wasn’t just one person who was talking to three of the men in the control room to figure out what happened. There were a lot of people trying to get to the bottom of what happened talking to a lot of the people who were working at the power plant that night.

With that said, though, as we learned earlier in this series the characters of Dyatlov, Toptunov and Akimov were real people. And the things we see Toptunov and Akimov tell Khomyuk in the series were also true: The AZ-5 button was pressed just before the explosion occurred.

That night, as they were running the test, Leonid Toptunov was looking at the computer data when he saw the power levels rising way too fast. Akimov was too busy focusing on the test they were running so he didn’t notice the levels until Toptunov shouted to Akimov that the levels were rising way too fast. Akimov must’ve realized how serious the situation was because he ordered Toptunov to push the AZ-5 button.

So, he did.

We already learned what that button does in the first episode of this series so I won’t repeat all of that now, but just as a quick refresher, when the operator pushes AZ-5, all the control rods are inserted into the reactor at once to stop the fission reaction.

It’s not a normal thing to push AZ-5, but think of it like the emergency brake in your car. If something is going wrong, you’re going to use it. At least, I would hope you do. Some cars these days have automated braking because they can sense a wreck—but you get the idea. It’s not something you use on a daily basis. That’s why it’s called an emergency haha!

And in the emergency, the AZ-5 button should’ve stopped everything and let them take a breather to figure out exactly what happened. According to Dyatlov’s recollection later, it was about 12 to 15 seconds after Toptunov pushed the AZ-5 button was pushed that the reactor exploded.

That’s another big reason why everyone was so confused in the moments immediately following the explosion. There are the obvious after-effects of what an explosion must be like…but then there’s the other part of it that just doesn’t make sense.

Imagine pulling the emergency brake in your car and instead of the car slowing to a stop as you’d expect, it just explodes.

Wait. What? Why? That’s not even anything close to what that is supposed to do!

So, you can imagine the pure confusion in the immediate aftermath of that!

If we go back to the series, as Khomyuk is leaving the hospital she happens to notice Lyudmilla Ignatenko in a room with her husband, Vasily. If you recall, he was one of the first firefighters to arrive on the scene. He’s not looking good now in the series, and Lyudmilla wants to be with her husband so he doesn’t die alone.

But when Khomyuk sees that Lyudmilla is holding Vasily’s hand, she scolds her and forces her out of the room. Lyudmilla is pregnant, she shouldn’t be touching Vasily’s hand! Khomyuk scolds the doctor in charge for letting it happen—something the doctor had told Lyudmilla not to do, but the doctor was so overwhelmed with other patients she didn’t keep an eye on Lyudmilla. Then, Khomyuk says something to the effect of how everyone is going to hear about this.

Just then, two KGB agents step out of the shadows. They heard everything and, as you can imagine, they don’t like the idea of Khomyuk telling anyone anything. So, they arrest her.

That’s made up, but mostly for reasons we’ve talked about already with Ulana Kyomyuk not being real. However, Lyudmilla and Vasily Ignatenko were real people.

A fantastic book to learn more about them is a book called Voices From Chernobyl from Svetlana Alexievich—she interviewed the real Lyudmilla and it’s so sad to read. It’s not a happy story at all, but I think you know that. I can’t replicate those words here, but if you want to dig into some of the stories of those who lost loved ones at Chernobyl, check out Svetlana’s book.

As for the idea of Khomyuk being arrested like we see in the series, that didn’t happen. How could it? Khomyuk wasn’t a real person. But it is true that the KGB tried to silence, detain and arrest people in an attempt to cover up what was happening at Chernobyl.

In all honesty, we’ll probably never know exactly how many people were arrested like we see happen to Khomyuk in the series. But I don’t think we need to. The series isn’t even trying to be accurate here, because we know this is a fictional character who is portraying the idea of something that happened.

On one hand, there was the state committee that was charged with figuring out what happened. On the other hand, the Soviet Union didn’t want too much information getting out—especially to other countries.

Going back to the series, at the end of the third episode we see Legasov tracking down the head of the KGB, a man named Charkov. In their conversation, Charkov lets Legasov know the KGB is a circle of accountability—just like the old Russian proverb, “Trust but verify.” And the Americans think Reagan came up with that, Charkov laughs.

Then, after Legasov tells Charkov he needs Khomyuk to continue his work, Charkov agrees to let her go on the condition that Legasov is held responsible for her from here on out.

All of this is made up, of course, because Khomyuk isn’t a real character so she couldn’t have gone to prison. What is real, though, is that the real KGB chairman, Viktor Chebrikov, was certainly involved in the Chernobyl situation. Something we don’t see much of in the series was just how much happened outside of the Chernobyl area. At Chebrikov’s command, the KGB was very involved in trying to keep anyone who might try to report on the situation to foreign nations—people like diplomats and news correspondents.

The accident itself was no secret. It couldn’t be since, as we learned, neighboring countries were detecting radiation. It was showing up in media across the world.

For example, there was a headline in London saying 2,000 people were killed while the official death toll at Chernobyl was two people, who they claimed were killed in the blast itself.

The number of 2,000 was an estimate, mostly because foreign nations like the United States had satellites that had taken photographs of the damage. Even though they couldn’t tell a lot of details from that, they knew at least 4,000 people worked at the power plant at any given time so the idea that only two people had perished from a blast that size seemed unbelievable. That number ended up being increased to 30, but almost everyone believes that list is only limited to the people in and around the explosion when it happened. Even to this day, it’s hard to know the exact number of people who were affected or killed because of the radiation…but it’s safe to say it was more than two and more than 30.

As for the “Trust but verify” line we hear Charkov say in the series—he is correct to say it was not President Ronald Reagan who came up with that.

But then again, most Americans at the time didn’t think he did come up with it, either. This was in the era of the Cold War, so tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union were high. Reagan found out about the phrase when he was preparing to meet with the Soviet leader, Mikhail Gorbachev. That phrase was one Reagan liked best of the Russian proverbs and sayings, so he used it.

I don’t think Gorbachev liked that Reagan used it.

Since then, a number of American politicians have used the saying and attributed it to Reagan. But that wasn’t during the timeline of the series, and it was not Reagan who came up with it originally.

At the very end of the third episode, we see Vasily Ignatenko and other first responders being buried. There aren’t many people there, but one of the people watching is Vasily’s wife, Lyudmilla. Obviously she’s filled with emotion as she watches her husband be put into the ground in a metal coffin that’s then covered with cement. It’s hard to lose a loved one, and this was not a normal funeral.

That is true, although there is more to the story.

The amount of radiation absorbed by the first responders and others closest to the exploded core was so high that officials were afraid their bodies would decompose and release radioactive materials into the ground that could then poison the water and so on.

To avoid this, their bodies were put into plastic bags, then inside regular coffins, and those coffins were then sealed in welded zinc caskets. Once buried, they were covered with cement.

On top of that was the secrecy around it. The Soviet Army was in charge of the funerals wanted to keep everything a secret so no foreign correspondents would know what was going on, or the extent they were going to try to contain the radioactivity of the bodies.

They waited for hours before burying Vasily, as Lyudmilla recalled being driven around for hours before finally getting to the cemetery. It’s almost as if they were trying to lose a tail in case someone was following the car from the hospital to the cemetery. Finally, after everything she had been through watching her husband die a gruesome death at the hospital for 14 days, Lyudmilla had enough. She burst out in a flurry of emotion and the Soviet colonel finally gave the order to go to the cemetery.

When they got to the cemetery it was like they couldn’t get it done fast enough. A minute or two and it was done. The zinc caskets were lowered and covered with cement. Lyudmilla went back to the dormitory where she’d been staying while her husband was in the hospital. The whole time someone was there making sure she didn’t talk to anyone or anyone to her. The day after Vasily’s burial, she was given a plane ticket and escorted to the airport. As she recalled, when she got home she slept for three whole days.

If you want to hear this in Lyudmilla’s words, I would highly recommend picking up a copy of the book Voices From Chernobyl by Svetlana Alexievich. In that book, Lyudmilla recounts what happened. It’s so sad the terrible way Vasily died from radiation poisoning and what Lyudmilla had to go through—and all this as she was only 23 years old.

The post 247: Chernobyl Part 3 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/247-chernobyl-part-3/feed/ 0 8559
245: Chernobyl Part 2 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/245-chernobyl-part-2/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/245-chernobyl-part-2/#respond Wed, 03 May 2023 11:00:00 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=8560 HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the second episode in the miniseries called Please Remain Calm. See the sources Full Chernobyl Series Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one! Buy me a coffee Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a […]

The post 245: Chernobyl Part 2 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the second episode in the miniseries called Please Remain Calm.

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

Episode number two starts with some text on the screen to let us know we’re now at the Byelorussian Institute for Nuclear Energy in Minsk. It’s 8:30 AM on Saturday, April 26th, 1986. So, that’s seven hours after the explosion.

Ulana Khomyuk, who is played by Emily Watson, gets woken up by her colleague, Misha. They’re the only ones there because it’s a Saturday…but they’re both workaholics, so they’re at work anyway.

Misha remarks how hot it is in the room and goes to open a window. A second after he does, the dosimeter alarm starts going off to indicate high radiation levels. He immediately closes the window.

A leak? The Americans?

Ulana opens the window quickly to gather a sample from the outside of the glass. She takes it into the lab where she tests it. The printer spits out a piece of paper that she takes back to her colleague.

It’s uranium decay. U-235. Reactor fuel. They call the closest nuclear power plant. It’s not them. What’s the next-closest? Chernobyl—but there’s no way it’s them, they’re 400 kilometers away and that’s too far to be leaking that kind of radiation. They’d have to be completely split open.

But, maybe they know something anyway. Ulana gives them a call. It rings. And rings. And rings.

Now, they’re concerned.

This scene is made up for the series, although there are elements of truth to it.

For example, in the first few shots we see a mural just before the text on the screen setting up the location as being at in the Byelorussian Institute for Nuclear Energy in Minsk. But that mural isn’t in Minsk. It’s actually at the Institute for Nuclear Research in Kyiv, in Ukraine and not Belarus.

That’s 530 kilometers, or 330 miles, away from Minsk.

So, it is a real mural—a beautiful mural—and it is tied to nuclear energy, so I can see why they’d want to include it in the series.

But one of the biggest changes in that first sequence comes from probably one of the biggest fictional elements in the entire series: Emily Watson’s character, Ulana Khomyuk. She’s a composite character.

So, of course, there couldn’t have been a way where she noticed uranium-235 because, well, she’s not a real person. Although, as we learned in our last episode, uranium-235 really is what they used to enrich the uranium-238 that was in the fuel rods for the reactor at Chernobyl. 

So, elements of truth.

If you haven’t already, there’s a great series of podcasts released by HBO with the writer of the miniseries, Craig Mazin. In that series, he talks about how and why he created the composite character of Ulana Khomyuk. In a nutshell, there were just too many real people—hundreds of scientists—who were trying to figure out what happened at Chernobyl. It’d be impossible to have hundreds of characters in the series and be able to keep track of who is who.

So, that’s why they made up the character of Ulana Khomyuk who they could turn into someone doing many of the real things those hundreds of scientists did…just in a way that’s a lot easier to keep track of as viewers.

Something else that’s worth pointing out is even if the specifics of the sequence we see in the opening of episode two isn’t entirely accurate to what really happened—the basic gist is true.

First, to clarify, the place where this is happening in the series is in modern-day Belarus. That’s an independent country now, although in 1986 it was part of the Soviet Union as Byleorussian SSR. The SSR stands for Soviet Socialist Republics—the same thing as in USSR, or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

What I mean by the opening sequence being basically true is it is true the radiation from Chernobyl drifted into the country we now know as Belarus. In fact, most of it did. Some experts say that about 70% of the radiation from Chernobyl drifted into Belarus.

Of course, not all of that happened in the first seven hours like we see in the opening sequence, but nevertheless the impact of the Chernobyl accident on Belarus is an important part of the story.

And the mention of iodine-131 is also true.

Iodine-131 is a byproduct of nuclear fission in reactors like the one at Chernobyl. When there’s too much of it in the atmosphere, it’ll get absorbed into your thyroid gland thereby increasing the risk of thyroid cancer.

There are still studies being done on residents of Belarus due to their exposure of Chernobyl’s fallout. One of the studies, which I’ll link to on this episode’s page over at basedonatruestorypodcast.com, concluded that childhood exposure to internal iodine-131 as a result of the Chernobyl accident is tied to increased risk of neoplastic thyroid nodules.

Without getting too sidetracked with the medical side, that’s a tumor that can be cancerous. So, basically, the study on people who were children in Belarus at the time of the Chernobyl accident has proven to be linked to an increased risk of cancer later in life.

Going back to the series, as the series shifts back to Valery Legasov and Boris Shcherbina being pulled into the story to figure out what’s going on…we’re faced with something we’ve seen a little bit in the first episode, too.

I’m speaking about how the series mentions the dosimeter reading of 3.6 roentgen.

In the first episode we see this reading, but in the second episode we see that Legasov isn’t happy with this reading. What bothers him about this is that he knows 3.6 roentgen is the maximum amount the lower quality dosimeters will go. So, that’s not necessarily an accurate reading—it’s just as high as they’ll go.

That whole concept is true—the dosimeters they were using at first maxed out at 3.6 roentgen. As I was watching this episode in particular, I was confused about why the number was 3.6. That just seems so random…but once I researched it more, it made a lot more sense.

To understand this more, we have to understand what that unit of measurement even means—a roentgen.

It’s named after a person named Wilhelm Roentgen. He won the very first Nobel Prize in Physics in 1901 for his 1895 discovery of what we now know as X-rays. Then in 1928, his last name was adopted as the first international measurement for ionizing radiation like happens at a nuclear power plant. It’s worth pointing out that in 1998, after the timeline of our story today, that unit was redefined, so it’s not really used for ionizing radiation anymore.

Now if we do the math to figure out how many seconds there are per hour, that’d be 3,600. And that is why the dosimeters they used at first could only go up to 3.6 roentgen, because they were maxing out at 1,000 microroentgens per second. There are 1,000,000 microroentgen in one roentgen, so 3,600 seconds times 1,000 equals 3,600,000 microroentgen or…3.6 roentgen per hour.

So, what does that mean for safety though?

After all, radiation is something that occurs in nature and everywhere all around us to some degree, most of it coming from the sun. While there are a lot of different factors that can determine how safe levels are—not every person is the same, not all factors are the same—but generally speaking, 60 microroentgens per hour is safe.

That’s 0.00006 roentgen per hour.

120 microroentgens an hour starts to get into dangerous territory.

With that in mind, it makes sense that the dosimeters they had at Chernobyl were sensitive enough to detect up to 1,000 microroentgens per hour. After all, that’s way more than is safe!

That level is definitely not safe—and the readings they got, just like we see in the series, were maxing out the dosimeters.

A level 3.6 roentgens per hour is detecting levels that aren’t safe.

Of course, if we’re looking at what deadly means—it’d take about five hours of constant exposure to 500 roentgens per hour, or 500,000,000 microroentgen per hour, to prove fatal for a human.

So, no, 3.6 roentgens isn’t safe, but it’s also a far cry from a fatal amount of 500 roentgen.

And it kind of makes sense for that to be a maximum level when you think about 120 being considered a risk in everyday life—1,000 should be a big warning.

When they ran the dosimeter in the control room, it read 800 microroentgens per second. That’s a lot, but then they ran it in another part of the control room and it went past the maximum of 1,000 microroentgens that the dosimeter could read.

After the explosion on April 26, 1986, and after the dosimeters read 800 microroentgen in one part of the control room and then maxed out the dosimeter at 1,000 microroentgen in another part, Anatoly Dyatlov figured it might be about 5 roentgens per hour. That’s about 1,388 microroentgen per second.

If that was the case, it’d make sense why the dosimeter would max out. It’d also make sense why it wasn’t seen as an extreme emergency quite yet, because something the series doesn’t mention is that the operators at Chernobyl already had a documented plan for the maximum amount of radiation. That was 25 roentgen per hour, which is a little under 7,000 microroentgen per second. Even at that rate, they were technically allowed to be there—but just for a few hours, and only in an extreme emergency.

So maybe that’s why Anatoly Dyatlov didn’t consider it to be the emergency we now know it was. But that’s pure speculation on my part—it’s hard to know what goes on in someone’s mind.

If we go back to the series, we’re at the point where we see Valery Legasov and Boris Shcherbina arriving at Chernobyl. We don’t see the specific time they arrive via helicopter, but we do see that they’ve been ordered to go there by Gorbachev himself. The way we see it depicted in the series, Shcherbina is the political leader of the committee digging into the accident while Legasov is the nuclear scientist to explain how nuclear reactors work to Shcherbina.

As we mentioned in the last episode, both Valery Legasov and Boris Shcherbina were real people. And the series is correct to explain their roles in investigating the Chernobyl accident.

Boris Shcherbina was, as the series suggests, a political leader. His official role at the time was as deputy prime minister in charge of energy for the government. He had a background in oil and gas. Something else to keep in mind was that in 1986, oil and gas were still making a lot more money for the Russian government than nuclear power was. Those two things are why the series is correct to show why Shcherbina wasn’t up on the nuclear side of energy.

That’s where the other man we see with him comes in: Valery Legasov.

Legasov’s role at the time was as first deputy to the director of the Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy.

In the morning hours of April 26th, Shcherbina found out he was in charge of the commission to determine what happened at Chernobyl. After going back to Moscow—he had been in Siberia, which was part of his normal weekend routine to check on various construction sites he was overseeing—Shcherbina had a chat with his boss about the accident and rounded up some experts, one of them being Legasov, to fly to Pripyat.

Legasov found out he was a part of the committee, not from a phone call while he was at home like we see at the end of the first episode, but rather he was at a state meeting about atomic energy. In that meeting they mentioned the Chernobyl accident, but it didn’t seem to be a big deal. A little bit later, while the meeting was on break, Legasov found out he was being ordered to the airport as part of the state commission.

And it is true that Legasov and Shcherbina had a conversation on the flight to the accident zone. They talked about the nuclear industry as a whole as well as some other nuclear accidents—in particular the more recent partial meltdown of the reactor at Three Mile Island in Pennsylvania in the United States. That was in March of 1979, so relatively recent in the minds of another nuclear accident now in 1986.

One difference from how we see things happening in the series to reality is the way Shcherbina and Legasov approached Chernobyl. In the series we can see them flying in helicopters near the power plant. They’re close enough to where Legasov can see the core is exposed right away, although Shcherbina isn’t quite sure how he can tell that from the position they’re in. Legasov points out the ionizing radiation in the air as being how he knows.

In truth, Legasov, Shcherbina, and the rest of the state committee flew into Kyiv. That’s about 130 miles, or 209 kilometers, away from Chernobyl. When they landed in Kyiv, they took cars to the nearby city of Pripyat where they’d basically set up their base of operations for the investigation.

Oh, and its daytime in the series, but in truth they arrived in Pripyat around 8:00 PM, about an hour or so after the sun had gone down. With that said, though, the series is correct to show Legasov and the others seeing something not right from afar. Even before they got there, Legasov later commented on what it was like when they drove up to Pripyat, saying the sky near the plant had a deep crimson glow to it.

Things were worse than they originally thought.

Going back to the series, it’s April 27th now, or 30 hours after the explosion. One of the first things they do is to figure out the real readings. Legasov doesn’t trust the number they received being at 3.6 roentgen because he knows that’s the maximum of the dosimeters they had—and also what he’s seen with his own eyes makes him think things are a lot worse than 3.6 roentgen.

To get the reading, we see them using a lead-lined truck with a high-range dosimeter. General Pikalov offers to drive the truck so no one else takes the risk. When he arrives, he tells Legasov and Shcherbina that the reading is not 3 roentgen—it’s 15,000.

General Pikalov is based on a real person who was there. The real Pikalov was in charge of the chemical warfare divisions of the military, so he was there to try to measure the radioactivity. And he did drive a truck like we see in the series to get a more accurate reading. It’s still not entirely accurate, but it’s enough to let everyone know they’re dealing with a lot more than they had initially thought.

From that, they determined the reaction was still happening—the reactor was still heating up. It wasn’t stable, it wasn’t cooling down. It was going to get worse if they didn’t do something.

With that said, though, the reading we see in the series is true. As you’ve probably figured out by now, the reading of 3.6 roentgen per hour was way off. Things were a lot worse than that. And the series is correct to give the number of 15,000. Although, it’s not like that was the number universally around the entire power plant.

In the series, when Shcherbina asks for an explanation of what the 15,000 number means, Legasov says it means the fire they’re watching with their own eyes is giving off nearly twice the radiation released by the bomb in Hiroshima. That’s every hour. Hour after hour, and at that point they’re 20 hours since the explosion so 40 bombs worth by now.

This example is made up for the series as a better way of describing what happened. A huge way we know this is because, quite simply, in 1986 we still didn’t even know exactly how much radiation the bombs in Hiroshima gave off. After all, that wasn’t a nuclear power plant. We know how powerful the bomb itself was, but we’re talking about radiation here…and that bomb was a surprise to a civilian population. They didn’t have dosimeters at the ready to determine how much radiation people were hit with.

In 2018, though, there were some tests done on a jawbone from someone who was in the attack and they found it to have absorbed 9.46 grays of radiation.

And again we’re hit with yet another form of measurement for radiation. Think of it kind of like how liquid can be measured in volume or in gallons…two measurements for the same amount of liquid. Okay, that’s not exactly a 1-to-1 example because if you’re a nuclear engineer you’ll know grays are measuring absorbed radiation compared to roentgen which measures ionized radiation…but for our purposes today, my point is merely that there are different ways to measure radiation in different ways.

Using a converter, I found 9.46 grays of radiation converts to 1,078,667,351 microroentgen, or 1,079 roentgen.

So, as far as my research is concerned that number doesn’t necessarily equate to 40 Hiroshima bombs—but at that point it almost doesn’t even matter what the specific numbers are. It’s not the survivable 3.6 roentgen per hour. It’s a number so high that it simply means if you’re in the area you’re going to die. Humans can’t survive anywhere near that kind of radiation. It’s the kind of deadly that kills humans many times over, the only thing at that point is just a matter of when you die as a result of the radiation.

And that right there brings to light something we see throughout the series that is very true: Most of these people working on figuring out and dealing with the Chernobyl accident were doing that knowing they were giving their lives doing so.

One of the books I used as a resource for this entire series is called Chernobyl Notebook by Grigoriy Medvedev. His book offers some of the few first-hand accounts and have been used as a source for many people since then. In his book, Medvedev recounts someone who made that sacrifice.

Here’s a quote from his book:

“Making a preliminary assessment of the situation and the actions of the operating personnel after the explosion, we can say that the turbine operators in the turbine hall, the firemen on the roof, and the electricians headed by Aleksandr Grigoryevich Lelechenko, deputy chief of the electrical shop, displayed unconditional heroism and self-sacrifice. These people prevented development of the disaster both inside and outside the turbine hall and thus saved the entire plant.

“Aleksandr Grigoryevich Lelechenko, protecting the young electricians from going unnecessarily into the zone of high radiation, himself went into the electrolysis space three times in order to turn off the flow of hydrogen to the emergency generators. When we take into account that the electrolysis space was alongside the pile of debris, and fragments of fuel and reactor graphite were everywhere, and the radioactivity was between 5,000 and 15,000 roentgens per hour, one can get an idea of how highly moral and heroic this 50-year-old man was when he deliberately shielded young lives behind his own. And then in radioactive water up to his knees, he studied the condition of the switchboxes, trying to supply voltage to the feedwater pumps…

His total exposure dose was 2,500 rads, enough to kill him five times. But after he had received first aid (they injected physiological solution into his vein) at the medical station in Pripyat, Lelechenko rushed back to the unit and worked there several more hours.

He died a terrible painful death in Kiev.”

With that quote, we get an idea of just one person who sacrificed their own life to try and stop the damage from getting even worse. It’s worth pointing out, though, that while Medvedev said in his book they gave their lives to save the entire plant, if we were to look at the entire story through a lens of history we know that isn’t always the case. Not that it was on purpose, but sometimes the actions they took actually made things worse.

One example of this is something we don’t see in the series at all, even though it relates to things we’ve seen already in the series.

Remember back when Anatoly Dyatlov was in the control room soon after the explosion? Well, as the firefighters were working to extinguish the fire in the turbine hall, Dyaltov had the radiation measured. Of course, the dosimeter showed a value of 3.6 roentgen per hour. It maxed out.

A little later, Dyatlov then decided it’d be safer for any non-essential personnel to go to a different building. He didn’t think things were as bad as they were, but he wanted to be safe. It was Reactor #4 that had the emergency, after all, so he ordered everyone to go to the closest safe reactor nearby. They went to Reactor #3.

And to make it even safer for them, he ordered the ventilation in Reactor #4 to be turned off so they could crank the ventilation in Reactor #3 into high gear.

That wouldn’t be a bad idea if the situation was as Dyatlov thought—but the fact was that Reactor #4 had exploded. So, by turning up the ventilation in Reactor #3, they were basically pumping in the radioactive air from outside that Reactor #4 was spewing into the air.

And that is an example of how someone makes what they think is the best decision at the time, but in reality it ends up making things even worse.

If we go back to where we are in the timeline of the series, we see a lot happening on April 27th, the day after the explosion. Since they know it’s a big deal, one of the first things we see them trying to do as a resolution is to dump a ton of…well…according to the series, it’s actually 5,000 tons of boron and sand.

We see the first helicopter trying to deliver its load of boron and sand over the exposed core simply fall apart in the sky.

The basic idea of dropping things on the reactor is true, although there is more to the story we don’t see in the series.

For example, in the series we see Legasov asking Shcherbina for the 5,000 tons of boron and sand. In truth, Shcherbina had the idea to use clay and boron. Legasov asked for 2,000 tons of lead, but he also was the first to admit that probably wouldn’t be enough—this was a bad situation to the level he’d never dealt with before.

So, in the end, Shcherbina ordered 6,000 tons of boron, sand, clay, and lead that they planned on dropping onto the open reactor from helicopters. And there was at least one helicopter that crashed in the process—although I couldn’t find anything in my research to suggest the helicopter just fell apart in the sky like we see in the series. In fact, there’s video footage of a helicopter crashing as it dropped its contents at Chernobyl—but that was because it got too close to a construction crane, it clipped it and went down. It’s not like it fell apart on its own because of the radiation. I’ll include a link to that in the resources for this episode if you want to watch that.

The purpose for dropping these items wasn’t random. Sand would suffocate the fire. Lead lowered the graphite from the exploded core that was still burning. And if you remember from the first episode, boron was in the control rods to absorb neutrons to slow the nuclear chain reaction—so dropping that with clay would help slow any continuing reaction from getting worse and worse.

Something else we don’t see in the series was that there were people who didn’t like this idea. For example, someone who isn’t in the series at all was Valentyn Fedulenko, who was considered an expert on RBMK reactors. Legasov was a nuclear expert, but not necessarily very experienced with RBMK reactors. In fact, he didn’t have any experience with them. When he found out he was on the committee for the Chernobyl accident, his first reaction was to grab any technical info on RBMK reactors and talk to people he knew that had worked with them to get a better idea of the specifics on how they worked.

While Legasov was a nuclear expert, Fedulenko was considered the top expert on RBMK reactors specifically. When he arrived in Pripyat on April 27th, he didn’t like the idea of dropping sand, clay and lead on the reactor. A big reason for this was because he knew the reactor’s lid had been blown off—but the way it landed was to leave the core partially exposed. He didn’t think the helicopters could accurately drop their load onto the partially exposed reactor core.

But, it happened anyway. By the time April 28th rolled around, 300 tons of materials had been dropped. Another 750 tons on April 29th. Another 1,500 tons on April 30th. Another 1,900 tons on May 1st.

We’re getting a little ahead of the series timeline here, but with purpose because the amount of material dropped to smother the core ended up becoming an issue itself. They couldn’t just keep doing that because it was so much weight that they thought maybe the reactor would collapse on itself to lower levels of the unit. 

So, that’s why they stopped dumping material onto the reactor. But that didn’t fix the issue.

If we go back to the series, things get bad enough that radiation levels are detected as far as Sweden.

That happened, and a lot of people think the detection of the radiation by surrounding countries ultimately would become a big reason why the Soviet Union couldn’t hid everything.

Even though people like Shcherbina, Legasov and others knew about the accident soon after it happened, most of the world outside the Soviet Union didn’t know anything at all had happened until the morning of April 28th. There was a sensor at Sweden’s Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant that detected higher than usual radiation.

At first, they thought it was a mistake. Maybe a broken detector. Maybe it was a leak on-site. They evacuated their 600 or so staff members as they tried to figure out what was going on. Soon they figured out it wasn’t internal.

But if it was external, what could it be? Maybe a nuclear bomb. Would that mean war had broken out? What could that mean!?

By the evening of April 28th, it wasn’t just Sweden that had detected elevated radiation. Finland and Norway were also getting similar readings. Okay, so it’s not nuclear war. It’s something else. But everyone has done internal testing and it’s not them…these readings are coming from somewhere else. As that alerted them to there being an issue, ultimately that would lead to the Soviet Union being forced to admit there was an accident at Chernobyl.

If we go back to the series, one of the other major plot points we see happens when the entire city of Pripyat is evacuated. That happened, although there is more to the story than we see in the HBO miniseries.

Starting at midnight on April 27th, buses started to arrive in the city of Pripyat with the idea they’d be evacuating civilians. Things were still in a bit of flux—no one knew it’d be a permanent evacuation.

On April 27th, 1986 at about 1:00 PM, there was an announcement broadcast the city of Pripyat. Here’s an excerpt from that announcement:

[ PLAY 20 SECONDS OF THE CLIP ]

Now, I don’t speak Russian, so I’ll admit that I had to use a translator for this…but that announcement says something like:

“Attention! Attention! The City Council informs you that in connection with the accident at the Chernobyl atomic power station, unfavorable radiation conditions are developing in the city of Pripyat. The Communist Party, its officials and the armed forces are taking necessary steps to fight this. Nevertheless, in order to ensure complete safety for residents, children first and foremost, it has become necessary to carry out a temporary evacuation of the city’s residents to nearby settlements of Kyiv oblast. For that purpose, buses will be provided to every residence today, April 27, beginning at 14:00 hours, under the supervision of police officers and representatives of the city executive committee. It is recommended that people take documents, absolutely necessary items and food products to meet immediate needs. All houses will be guarded by the police during the evacuation period. Comrades, on leaving your dwellings temporarily, please do not forget to close windows, switch off electrical and gas appliances and turn off water taps. Please remain calm, organized and orderly of this short-term evacuation.”

We know from history this announcement was repeated multiple times to residents in the city right before they were to supposed to evacuate. Some sources I saw mentioned giving the residents two hours while others mentioned them having less than an hour. In ether case, there wasn’t much time.

Can you imagine? What would you do if there was an announcement like that where you live? This was a Saturday, so imagine you’re out on the town during the weekend and you hear that being broadcast.

What would you do? Would you believe it at first? Would the first thing you do be to rush home and pack all the belongings you’ll need for the rest of your life? I know I wouldn’t. I’d wonder what’s going on. Should we do what it’s saying? Why is that being said? What in the world is going on?

What we don’t know from history is just how much everyone understood the seriousness of what it meant. How could they know this was evacuating their homes forever? Nothing about this announcement suggested they’d be leaving Pripyat to never return—quite the opposite, actually.

For the most part, the series is correct to show there wasn’t a huge issue with the evacuation. Most people just did what they were told. Did they understand it? No, not necessarily. But they didn’t need to understand. They did what they were told and, looking at it from a historical lens, we know that worked out for their best to leave the radioactive area near and around Chernobyl.

If we go back into the series, at the end of the second episode we see the next attempt to slow the heat from continuing to rise. This comes in the form of trying to release water from tanks before the heated sand—basically a lava-like material at that point—hits the tanks. If they don’t, the lava hitting the tank will instantly heat it up so fast it’ll cause a thermal explosion that’ll destroy the remaining reactors at Chernobyl and release so much radioactive material that millions of people will probably die and entire regions like Byleorussia and Ukraine will be completely uninhabitable for at least 100 years.

To avoid this, they have to open the valves and release the water before the lava gets there. But the men who do that will be exposed to so much radiation they’ll likely die. According to the series, the three men who volunteer for this are Ananenko, Bezpalov and Baranov.

That whole scenario is true, even down to the names of the three men who were sent to try and avoid this disaster…but because the TV series shows more of this in the third episode, we’ll talk more about them in our next episode as well.

One thing we don’t see in the series at all is that the boron they dumped along with the sand didn’t make it to the core. The purpose was exactly what the series shows, to use a mixture of sand and boron. The sand to help smother the fires and boron to absorb the neutrons to halt the continuing heat generated by the ongoing fission reaction.

But next to none of that boron even made it to the core, so it was kind of pointless. The reason we don’t see that mentioned in the series, though, is because at the time they didn’t know that. We only know that now looking at the event through a historical lens.

That’s just another example of how they tried to do the right thing, but what they tried doing ended up only making things worse.

One thing they did know though, was the detection of ruthenium. That’s a chemical element that belongs to the platinum group on the periodic table, atomic number 44. The reason that’s important is because they found the ruthenium was melting. And because they knew the melting point for ruthenium is 2,250 degrees Celcius—or about 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit—that means the fires near the core were at least that hot.

There are actually pictures and footage of the molten lava-like substance they managed to get, and I’ll include links to those in the resources links for this series.

That basically meant they had a nuclear meltdown on their hands.

Now, I know a nuclear meltdown is something we’re all familiar with…by that, I mean it’s a term we’ve probably all heard. But if you’re like me and not a nuclear engineer, what exactly does that mean?

To understand that, we have to have some basic knowledge about how a nuclear reactor works. We talked about that in the last episode. So, in that episode we learned about parts like a control rod and the uranium used as nuclear fuel.

To build on that knowledge, a nuclear meltdown occurs when the core gets so hot that the uranium melts. When it does that, it can burn through any casing and fall to the bottom of the reactor. Then, as it continues to get hotter and hotter, it’ll turn into the molten lava-like material they talk about in the series. That’s what can burn through any of the protective layers in the reactor and, eventually, hit the ground itself.

Once it does that, the only thing left is the earth itself. Everything, including the water in the ground get contaminated by the radioactive molten uranium.

These days there’s usually a layer of metallic alloy beneath the reactor to catch things before they get to the earth below. That’s an safety feature added in the wake of the Chernobyl accident.

That means at Chernobyl, there was no extra safety feature in case of a meltdown. There was just a water reservoir that was used for the emergency cooling pumps. That water was what they were concerned about. The moment the meltdown hit that, it’d start a new chain reaction of destruction. The water would instantly heat up, turning it into steam in an explosion that would hit the other three reactors at Chernobyl. Doing that would mean the nuclear fuel in those reactors would vaporize.

That’s the explosion they were trying to avoid.

The series is correct to show that some of the Soviet scientists working on the Chernobyl accident gave estimates that the potential explosion would basically flatten 200 square kilometers—that’s about 77 square miles—poison all the water in the area, killing who knows how many of the 30 million people who used it as drinking water and render Byelorussia and Ukraine uninhabitable.

Of course, thankfully we can look back on this event through a historical lens to know that did not happen. So that means it’s all speculation on how terrible it could have been.

But that’s what they were afraid of happening.

To avoid that, they needed to release the water from that reservoir. The challenge to that is just what we see in the series: The valves for that have to be turned by hand. Those valves were in the basement. And that basement was flooded with what was now radioactive water.

That brings us back to the three men who volunteered to turn the valves: Alexei Ananenko, Valery Bezpalov and Alexandrovich Baranov.

And that story is something we learn more about in episode three of the miniseries, so we’ll do that as we pick up next time where we’re leaving off about the true story behind episode number three of HBO’s Chernobyl!

The post 245: Chernobyl Part 2 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/245-chernobyl-part-2/feed/ 0 8560
243: Chernobyl Part 1 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/243-chernobyl-part-1/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/243-chernobyl-part-1/#respond Wed, 26 Apr 2023 10:30:00 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=8550 HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the first episode in the miniseries called 1:23:45. See the sources Full Chernobyl Series Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one! Buy me a coffee Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story […]

The post 243: Chernobyl Part 1 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries tells the story of the worst nuclear disaster in history. Today, we’ll be looking at the first episode in the miniseries called 1:23:45.

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

There’s some text on screen that gives us a time and place.

Moscow. April 26, 1988. And while it’s not included in the text, the camera shot behind the text is a clock giving us the exact time. It’s 1:10 and since it’s dark through the apartment window, we can assume that’s 1:10 AM.

The apartment belongs to Valery Legasov, who is played by Jared Harris. He’s just poured himself a drink and is listening to a cassette tape. On the recording, his own voice talks about how stories only want to know who is to blame. And, in this story, the best choice was Anatoly Dyatlov because he ran the room that night and he didn’t have friends—not important enough ones, at least. So, he’ll serve ten years in a prison labor camp.

Legasov stops the playback. Then, he hits the record button and continues the story where it left off. This time he’s speaking into the cassette tape.

He ends the recording by saying he’s given everything he knows. They’ll deny it, of course. They always do. He stops the tape and puts it with others—five others, for a total of six. Each tape is labeled with a number 1 through 6. He wraps them all in newspaper and then walks outside to hide the bundle in a grate nearby. He also takes out his cat’s litter so it seems like he’s just doing chores to the man in the car obviously watching his house from the street. We can assume it’s a KGB agent, although the series never really tells us for sure. It seems to work because the man stays in the car.

With that done, Legasov heads back inside.

A few minutes later, we find out why the episode has the title 1:23:45. It’s the time. Looking at his watch as the seconds tick closer to 1:23 AM and 45 seconds, that is exactly the moment when Legasov climbs up on furniture in his apartment and hangs himself.

Then, the next shot we see transports us back in time exactly two years and one minute earlier. Then, of course, we see the explosion—which we’ll get to in a moment, but before we do, we can tell from how the series sets up this opening sequence with the timing that it’s saying Valery Legasov committed suicide exactly two years to the second after the Chernobyl accident.

There’s a lot of what we saw in the opening sequence that is true, but the biggest inaccurate thing is the idea that Legasov committed suicide to coincide with the two-year anniversary of the explosion down to the second. That is simply not true.

It is true that Legasov committed suicide near the two-year anniversary of the explosion, but not necessarily down to the exact second of the explosion itself. In fact, as we’ll learn about in more depth later on, there was more than one explosion.

The truth is that Valery Legasov hung himself in his apartment on April 27th, 1988—that’s two years and one day after the explosion.

Or, maybe he didn’t intend for it to be timed perfectly with the explosion itself, but maybe it was because the next day, on the 28th of April, 1988, that’s when he was scheduled to release the outcomes of the investigation into the causes of the disaster.

There are also some discrepancies to exactly where Legasov hung himself. Some sources say it was in his Moscow apartment like we see in the series. Some say it was in the stairwell of his apartment complex.

He didn’t leave a note, so there’s a lot of speculation as to his reasons—and my own speculation is that it’s too close to the anniversary of the explosion to be a coincidence.

What he did leave were tapes of his memories that he’d been recording since he became involved in the Chernobyl disaster. Some also point to something we don’t see in the HBO miniseries at all: It’s not the first time he attempted suicide.

For that, we’d have to go back to the summer of 1987.

But, that attempt didn’t succeed and for a while Legasov threw himself back into his work. Meanwhile, his health continued to fail due to the radiation he was exposed to and on the two-year anniversary of the Chernobyl disaster, a proposal he had to launch a new committee on chemical research was rejected. That same day, he gathered all his personal belongings from his office. The next day, he was found dead at his apartment.

While ostracized for his involvement during his life, in the aftermath of his apparent suicide, Legasov’s tapes couldn’t be denied. They were circulated in the scientific community and eventually extracts of them were published the following month, May of 1988. Nearly ten years later, on September 20th, 1996, President Boris Yeltsin, posthumously gave Valery Legasov the title of Hero of the Russian Federation—Russia’s highest honorary title.

But, alas, even though the HBO miniseries starts at the end, we don’t want to get too far ahead ourselves in the story.

Let’s go back into the timeline of the first episode now. There’s text on the screen that tells us we’re two years and one minute before Valery Legasov’s suicide.

Of course, as we learned, the series wasn’t quite right with the timing of Legasov’s suicide, but if we were to follow their timeline then two years and one minute earlier would be April 26th, 1986 at 1:22 AM. That timing is correct to set us up just before the explosion.

We’re in Pripyat, Ukrainian SSR.

A woman named Lyudmilla Ignatenko, who is played by Jessie Buckley, happens to be awake to use the restroom. Afterward, she goes to the kitchen to get a drink. She doesn’t even notice the bright light in the distance out the window of her apartment. Then, a moment after we see the blast, the sound hits, shaking the apartment.

That, she noticed. So did her husband, Vasily, who wakes up. Together, they look out the window at the glow in the distance. The explosion throws a pillar of blue light into the sky that looks like something we’d expect to see in a science fiction movie.

Before we go any further, I wanted to touch on how the explosion looked. What we see in the series is most likely pretty accurate, but I also think we should set some expectations. It’s not like it was caught on film, so no one really knows what it looked like for absolute certainty.

Remember, this was in 1986. There weren’t cell phones with cameras in everyone’s pocket. There weren’t security cameras in houses, businesses or even cars like we see today.

It was also 1:23 in the morning. And Chernobyl was specifically built to be away from the huge city it provided power to: Kiev. Of course, that’s now the city of Kyiv since Ukrainian independence following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

The city of Pripyat mentioned in the series is a real city. It’s located about 62 miles, or 100 kilometers, away from Kyiv and was built in 1970 primarily as a home for people working in and around the Chernobyl power plant. By 1986, there were about 49,000 people who lived in Pripyat. For comparison, the city of Chernobyl itself where the power plant was had about 14,000 residents in 1986.

So, that’s another limitation of the eyewitnesses to the explosion. Not only was it in the middle of the night in the year 1986 where automated monitoring technology just wasn’t as common as it is today…but it’s not like there were millions of people around.

With all that said, it’s not like there was no one around either.

There were people who worked at the plant 24/7, many of whom were alerted by the explosion itself and rushed to see what happened.

To see the explosion itself, there were some people who just happened to be fishing nearby at that moment. And by nearby, I mean very nearby. You see, there was a pond near the power plant that held water used to cool the plant. That pond was also used to stock fish—something they used as a way of showing how safe everything was.

So, there were a couple of guys who happened to be fishing in that pond about 800 or 900 feet away—about 250 meters or so—away from reactor number four when it exploded.

According to these eyewitness accounts, there was a fireball that rose from Reactor #4—or, as they referred to it, Unit 4. Along with the fireball rose a mushroom cloud of smoke. A red column of light from the explosion turned blue as it rose into the sky, surrounded by the black cloud of smoke.

It’s probably not what you want to see coming from a nuclear reactor. But, of course, that’s also looking at things through a historical lens where we already have an idea of what happened at Chernobyl.

At the time, they had no idea just how bad it was.

Yes, there was an explosion—two of them actually, one right after the other.

Yes, there was a fire.

The fishermen kept on fishing, though. There was no way they could’ve known how serious things actually were.

Going back to the series, inside the control room right after the explosion we can see the man in charge is Anatoly Dyatlov. He’s played by Paul Ritter in the series.

“What just happened?” Dyatlov asks the others in the control room as dust falls from the ceiling as a result of the blast. No one seems to know the answer.

Then, someone named Perevozschenko bursts in the room exclaiming there’s a fire in the turbine hall.

After a moment’s pause, Dyatlov figures it out…the turbine hall. That’s the control system tank. Hydrogen. That would cause the explosion. He turns to two of the men working the controls, Akimov and Toptunov, and berates them. He blames them for blowing up the tank.

That is all a pretty good dramatization of what most likely happened in the control room that night.

The reason I say it’s “most likely” what happened is simply because we have to rely on the memories of people who were there that night to piece together the story. That’s not unique to our story today—there are lots of times in history where we can only rely on the memory of those who were there. But it’s important to know that because memory can often be an unreliable interpretation of what happened, especially when it comes down to specific things we see in the HBO series like who said what.

With that said, the men we see in the control room in the series were real people. Anatoly Dyatlov was the deputy chief engineer. Aleksandr Akimov was the chief of the unit’s shift and Leonid Toptunov was the reactor operator. And it is true that one of the mechanics came into the control room to let them know the turbine hall was on fire.

Not to skip too far ahead of where we are in the timeline of the first episode, but a little later in the first episode there is some dialogue where Dyatlov, Akimov and Toptunov are talking about the tank. Dyatlov mentions the tank on 71 is 100 cubic meters. Akimov corrects him, saying it’s 110 cubic meters.

While it’d make sense for people who work at the Chernobyl power plant to understand what all that means, for those of us who didn’t, what they’re talking about is the location of the control system tank.

It was 71 meters, or about 233 feet, directly above the control room. It also held 110,000 liters, or about 29,000 gallons, of hot water and steam. As a quick little side note, that doesn’t mean the series is wrong to mention hydrogen. Hydrogen can be created by the reaction between steam and the fuel used in a reactor, and since hydrogen is extremely combustible it’d make sense to assume the hydrogen was the cause of the explosion.

But, the location of the tank is important because something we don’t see mentioned in the series is that Dyatlov expected all that hot water start leaking through the roof of the control room they were in at any moment.

One of the orders we don’t see him giving in the series that he actually did give was for everyone to move to an emergency control room. But, the series probably just simplified this, because it is true they never moved. Everyone was too focused on the alarms and indicators in the control room giving readings they couldn’t make sense of to pay attention to Dyatlov’s order to relocate. And, since the ceiling hadn’t started leaking yet, he didn’t push the matter. After all, every second mattered, and he knew they had to keep the reactor cooled.

This is important to keep in mind, though, because the more time that passed without the water leaking through the control room ceiling the more that became an indicator to Dyatlov that the explosion was probably not the control system tank.

If we go back into the series, though, Paul Ritter’s version of Anatoly Dyatlov has just come to the conclusion that it must be the control system tank that exploded. He orders water be pumped through the core. All that matters now is to keep the core cool, so the fire doesn’t affect it.

The man who burst into the room stops Dyatlov and says, “There is no core! It’s exploded!”

Anatoly Dyatlov pauses for a moment at this, thinking it through…then he disregards it. He’s in shock. The man persists, saying he saw the lid is off! But Dyatlov won’t believe him. RBMK reactor cores don’t explode, Dyatlov replies. You’re confused.

This whole concept of refusing to believe an RBMK reactor could explode was true…but it wasn’t because of a lack of education. If anything, it was quite the opposite: Their training was one of the main reasons they couldn’t even fathom the reactor core was what had exploded.

It was one of those things where the eyes saw something so unbelievable that the mind couldn’t comprehend the reality of it. There were simply too many fail-safes. Too many safety systems in place for that to happen. It wasn’t possible.

Even some of the plant workers who saw the aftermath of the blast would later recall their minds didn’t want to believe what their eyes saw.

To put it another way, they were simply blinded by their belief that the reactor was so safe it could never explode. Whatever had happened must have been something else—it couldn’t be the reactor. At least, that was the mindset for most people at the Chernobyl power plant that night. Of course, they would find out just how wrong they were.

Going back into the series, we see Anatoly Dyatlov ordering the men in the control room to pump more water into the core to keep it cool. We talked about that briefly a little bit earlier.

Now, if you’re like me and not a nuclear engineer, right about this point in the story it’s very helpful to understand how nuclear reactors work. So, remember where we were in the series with Dyatlov wanting to pump water into the core because it will make sense on the other side of this explanation of how nuclear reactors work.

In a single sentence: Nuclear reactors heat up water until it becomes steam which spins a turbine to generate electricity.

Of course, that is an extremely simplified version.

There are different kinds of nuclear reactors, but the one we hear about in the series is an RBMK reactor. And it is true that the Chernobyl reactor was an RBMK reactor. RBMK stands for a High-Power Channel-Type Reactor. Obviously, that’s the English translation. The letters RBMK line up better with the actual Russian words, reaktor bolshoy moshchnosti kanalnyy.

But, as you can tell from my butchered pronunciation, I can’t speak Russian! So, we’ll stick with calling it a High-Power Channel-Type Reactor, or just stick to RBMK haha!

There are a few things about RBMK reactors that’s helpful to keep in mind as we continue to learn about what happened at Chernobyl.

One of those things is they’re unique to the Soviet Union, and now Russia since there are still RBMK reactors around today even though the Soviet Union is not. That means in 1986, no other country had engineers with experience with RBMK reactors or any other training for them outside the Soviet Union. And as we’ve learned so far—inside the Soviet Union, the training for RBMK reactors only ever implied they had so many fail-safes and safety systems that the idea of an RBMK reactor exploding was unfathomable.

Another thing to keep in mind about RBMK reactors was that…well, Chernobyl wasn’t originally supposed to be an RBMK reactor. It was supposed to be what’s known as VVER. The English translation for that is Water-Water Energy Reactors. That was the Soviet version of the same type of nuclear reactor that’s in the United States, which is called Pressurized Water Reactors or PWR.

However, they decided to build RBMK reactors in Chernobyl instead because RBMK reactors could output twice the amount of energy as a VVER reactor and RBMK reactors could be built by machine plants that didn’t have any sort of nuclear industry-specific high-precision equipment.

So, basically, RBMK reactors were cheaper and more powerful.

That’s a win-win…right? Well, if that were true then we probably wouldn’t be telling the story today.

The last key thing to keep in mind about an RBMK nuclear reactor that I wanted to mention at this point in the story is that RBMK reactors use a graphite moderator in the control rods. No other reactor types do that, and we see graphite mentioned quite a bit in the HBO miniseries.

What does that mean, exactly? To understand that we’ll have to dive back into how nuclear reactors work for a moment.

So, earlier, we learned a nuclear reactor heats water to the point of becoming steam to then generate electricity.

The part that we’re talking about here is how an RBMK reactor heats the water. It does that through something called a fission reaction. That’s what happens a neutron hits a larger atom, splitting into two smaller atoms. Energy is released as well as additional neutrons, which can then repeat the process. That’s the chain reaction.

To help ensure the chain reaction continues more, something called a moderator is added to slow down the neutrons. That way you’ll get a better chain reaction and, in the process, more energy released. That results in more heat which results in more steam which results in more electricity.

The fuel used for a nuclear reactor is uranium. The uranium is made into pellets that are stacked into a metal tube called a fuel rod. In an RBMK reactor, it’s uranium-238 that’s slightly enriched with uranium-235.

The fuel rods with enriched uranium are positioned vertically inside the core of the reactor.

The core of an RBMK reactor is graphite—the same thing used in pencils, although for a nuclear reactor we’re obviously talking about something much bigger. The graphite core is more like the size of a house, and the graphite is a lot more pure than what’s in a pencil.

In the core, there are 1,660 vertical holes. That’s where the fuel rods are inserted.

But, it’s not like there are 1,660 fuel rods inserted.

You don’t want the chain reaction to go on and on unchecked forever, so there are also what are called control rods. The control rods are made of a material called boron carbide and, in RBMK reactors, there are graphite tips on the control rods. That graphite tip will play a part in the story later, but the boron carbide is a material absorbs the neutrons which, in turn, slows the fission reaction down.

With all that explained, the basic process then is that cool water is pumped into the core. It cools the core down, but it also flows around the fuel rods where the fission reaction heats up the water. Since heat rises, the steam comes out the top of the reactor where the reactor design forces the steam to the turbine where the electricity is generated.

More cool water is pumped in, it cools the core, is heated and leaves as steam.

If things get too hot from the chain reaction generating too much heat than the water coolant can handle, then you insert more control rods to absorb the neutrons and slow down the chain reaction.

And so on and so on, the balance continues as electricity is generated.

Okay, so in a nutshell, that is how RBMK nuclear reactors work. And yes, all that is still an extremely simplified version.

But that will help us understand the rest of the miniseries a lot better because…well, it’s a lot easier to understand how things went wrong when we know what they were supposed to be doing in the first place!

So, remember where we were in the miniseries?

Anatoly Dyatlov gave the order to pump water into the core just before he left to go to the Administration Building to talk to Viktor Bryukhanov and Nikolai Fomin. He really did do that, but it wasn’t the only order he gave. That was just one of the orders Dyatlov made after the explosion that would end up making an already terrible situation even worse.

The order to pump water into the core was his primary focus though.

A big part of that has to do with what we talked about earlier—the disbelief that the core itself had exploded. But the indicators in the control room were also telling them that there wasn’t any water at all flowing into the core. If the fuel rods didn’t have any coolant, they’d melt. That would be bad.

So, he thought the huge graphite core was still there and since they’d pushed the AZ-5 button—we’ll hear more about that later in the series—but basically that button inserts all the control rods into the core at once to completely halt the fission reaction. Since they did that, Dyatlov believed that all he had to do to cool the reactor down was to keep pumping cool water in. Since the chain reaction had been stopped with the control rods, the cool water wouldn’t be heated anymore and any residual heat that was there would eventually cool off with more cool water added.

At least—that was the idea behind his order to keep pumping the water into the core.

He also believed the fission reaction had been shut down. But because the indicators were showing no water was being pumped into the core, that’s why Dyatlov’s order was to try and restart the emergency water pumps. Those had been shut off for the test, but now he ordered them to restart those pumps in an attempt to cool the reactor before the fuel rods melted.

Or, basically, get water into the core as fast as you can. That will save the reactor and the fire brigade can handle the fire before things get worse.

That was the plan, at first.

Something we don’t really see in the series, though, is that plan was more complex than it sounds because Dyatlov realized pretty quickly that the fission reaction had not been shut down like he thought at first. From the control room indicators, they could tell the control rods hadn’t descended all the way like they were supposed to when they shut down the reactor. Not only that, but the control rods had stopped about one-third of the way down.

That’s additionally bad because, as we learned earlier, the control rods in RBMK reactors have graphite tips. So, not only was the boron not slowing down the fission reaction, the partially-inserted control rods with graphite tips were basically acting just like the graphite core around it—increasing the fission reaction!

Thinking fast, Dyatlov thought if the button to insert the control rods all the way didn’t work, maybe they could be fully inserted manually. So, he ordered a couple of interns who had been in the control room to learn from the test to go try that. But then he immediately realized that was a bad idea because the control rods were huge—they can’t be inserted through manpower alone. Even the manual controls required a servo motor that was powered by electricity. Since there wasn’t power, the servo motor wouldn’t be able to help move the control rods so there’d be no way they could be lowered manually.

But, the two men had already left the control room. Dyatlov ran after them for a moment, but they were down the hall and out of sight.

They couldn’t have known it at the time, but they were trying to do an impossible task and running even closer toward the exploded core.

While he was in the hall outside the control room, Dyatlov noticed it was filled with dust and smoke from the fire in the turbine hall. That was a fire he already knew about, and one that we talked about briefly before when we found out about his decision to call the fire brigade to deal with the fires.

If we go back into the series now, there’s text on the screen to tell us it’s 2:30 AM.

There are two things we see happening that we’ll talk about. The first is what I just mentioned, the fire brigade coming—we’ll come back to that in a bit.

The other is when we see Viktor Bryukhanov getting the phone call that wakes him up about the accident. He meets Nikolai Fomin at the Administration Building where they both go into what looks like a bunker with a long conference table in it. Dyatlov is already there and he starts filling them in on what happened.

The basic concept of this is true, although it was around 2:00 AM when Bryukhanov got the call to wake him up about the accident. That’s kind of splitting hairs, though. What’s not splitting hairs is something we see Con O’Neill’s version of Viktor Bryukhanov tell Dyatlov that there’s no way they can blame him for the accident—he was asleep when it happened!

This whole conversation we see between Dyatlov, Bryukhanov and Fomin in the series is a simplified version of what happened. In truth, they talked on the phone first…they didn’t talk in person for a few hours after we see it happening in the series.

Something else we don’t see in the series is that even though Bryukhanov didn’t know the extent of the explosion he had gotten the call about, as the bus he was riding to the plant got closer, he noticed the top of Unit 4 was gone.

At that moment, he knew he would be blamed for it. He was in charge of the power plant, so it didn’t matter that he was asleep when things went wrong. It was a big enough of a deal that he’d take the fall for it. Anything that goes wrong, you’re the one in charge so you’re the one who takes the blame. That’s how things worked in the Soviet Union.

Talking to Anatoly Dyatlov also wasn’t the first thing Bryukhanov did when he arrived at the plant. He actually decided to investigate himself and went toward Unit 4. But, he stopped when he saw pieces of graphite on the ground and the building next to the reactor hall in complete ruins. He didn’t want to see more, so he went back to his office to make phone calls.

It was to the chief of the night shift, a man who isn’t in the series at all. His name was Boris Rogozhkin. He was the one who had gone to the control room to talk to Dyatlov, Akimov and Toptunov. So it was Rogozhkin who told Byrukhanov over the phone what Dyatlov had said: We pressed the AZ-5 button, and 12 to 15 seconds later there was an explosion.

The AZ-5 button is the emergency shutdown that lowers all the control rods into the core, stopping the fission reaction. It definitely was not supposed to cause an explosion!

Once Bryukhanov got off the phone with Rogozhkin, he turned around and started calling his superiors to let them know about the accident—at least, what they knew so far. After that, Bryukhanov called Dyatlov to tell him to come over to the underground bunker to talk to him directly. But that wasn’t until around 4:00 AM, not soon after 2:00 AM like we see in the series.

Speaking of which, if we go back into the series, we see the firefighters continuing to battle the flames.  According to the series, they first arrived on scene around 1:30 AM.

We see shots of them here and there between things we’ve seen in the reactor. Time passes until around 3:30 AM, and there’s some dialogue between the firefighters that lets us know they’ve done everything they can from the outside. They need to start making their way to the roof now. We also see some of the firefighters reacting to some of the debris—debris that’s molten hot in some cases, other debris that’s not hot to the touch but still causes burns after the firefighters pick it up.

The series has so many different angles to tell the story that we don’t see everything from every angle—and that makes sense.

But in the true story, by the time 2:00 AM rolled around, firefighters were starting to address the fire on the roof of Unit 3—it was connected to Unit 4. They quickly realized it was more than just fire. Less than half an hour later, the firefighters were starting to get sick. They didn’t know exactly what the cause was—but they knew enough about fighting fires to know there was something different this time.

Still, there was a fire to be extinguished.

We don’t see this character in the HBO miniseries, but the commander of the fire department that responded was the 35-year-old Major Leonid Teliantnikov.

By the time 2:30 rolled around, the fire on the roof of the reactor hall had mostly been extinguished, but Teliantnikov noticed his men weren’t right. They were sick. So, he ordered them to go in an ambulance to the Pripyat hospital. An hour or so later, around 3:30 AM, Teliantnikov and his men were battling the flames on the roof of Unit #3. Except, he’d been exposed too much himself. So, he went to the hospital himself, leaving the firefighters without their commander.

This is way beyond the scope of episode number one, but it was closer to 7:00 AM when the firefighters finally had the flames extinguished.

And since I mentioned episode number one, if we head back to the HBO miniseries we’re at the end of the first episode where a phone rings.

Tying into the beginning of the episode, Valery Legasov is the man who answers the phone. On the other end of the line is Boris Shcherbina. Through the conversation, Legasov finds out about the accident and that he’s been assigned to a committee to manage the accident.

Specifics of the conversation were surely made up for the series, but the basic concept here is true.

Boris Shcherbina was a real person. He really was in charge of the commission to get to the bottom of things…and to offer another bonus point to the accuracy of things, the creators of the series even found an excellent actor of the same age. The real Boris Shcherbina was 66 years old in 1986 when he was put in charge of the commission, while the actor playing Boris Shcherbina in the HBO miniseries, Stellan Skarsgård, was 68 years old in 2019 when the series was released…and probably a year or two younger when they filmed the series before being released.

So, that’s a minor thing, but something I think is worth pointing out to highlight the level of detail the creators went to in this series.­

Both Valery Legasov and Boris Shcherbina were very real people involved in the true story…

…and those are two names we’ll hear about a lot more in our upcoming episodes as we dig into the rest of HBO’s Chernobyl miniseries!

The post 243: Chernobyl Part 1 appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/243-chernobyl-part-1/feed/ 0 8550
220: Classic: The Man Who Invented Christmas https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/220-classic-the-man-who-invented-christmas/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/220-classic-the-man-who-invented-christmas/#respond Sat, 17 Dec 2022 11:00:00 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=8199 Today we’re replaying an episode of Based on a True Story from 2018 about the 2017 movie The Man Who Invented Christmas. The story the movie tells the tale of Charles Dickens as he struggles to write A Christmas Carol. Get The Man Who Invented Christmas book Listen to A Christmas Carol Did you enjoy […]

The post 220: Classic: The Man Who Invented Christmas appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

Today we’re replaying an episode of Based on a True Story from 2018 about the 2017 movie The Man Who Invented Christmas. The story the movie tells the tale of Charles Dickens as he struggles to write A Christmas Carol.

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

The movie opens with some text on the screen giving us a bit of background. We’re in New York in the year 1842. According to the movie, Charles Dickens is basking in the success of his latest novel, Oliver Twist, as he’s touring around America. Fans of the book are welcoming him in every city with lavish galas.

As we see Charles, who’s played by Dan Stevens, back stage, we hear the announcer introducing him. Tonight, live on stage, the great magician of our time whose wand is a book! The Shakespeare of the novel, the people’s author, the great and marvelous Boz! Ladies and gentlemen, it’s Charles Dickens!

Then, walking out on stage, Charles appears to thunderous applause. The stage changes behind him, indicating this happens in cities across America.

So, did this tour of America happen? And wait a moment, did the guy who introduced him on stage call him Boz? What’s with that?

Well, as dramatized as these scenes may be for the movie, they’re still pretty accurate. Charles Dickens’ book, Oliver Twist, was published between the years 1837 and 1839 in a series of 24 sequential installments known as a serial.

It marked the first time in an English novel that there was a child as the main protagonist — Oliver Twist, of course, being the child’s name.

And it is true that, in 1842 like the movie says, Charles Dickens embarked on a tour across America where he was hailed like a rock star. Everyone loved him. In fact, even though the movie doesn’t mention the date, the event we see happen first in New York in 1842 was on Valentine’s Day and was a massive ball that rivaled any event the city had seen up to that point.

There were 3,000 people at the Park Theatre that night, and Charles spent much of it dancing with his wife, Catherine. She’s played by Morfydd Clark in the movie.

But, that tour wasn’t all happiness. The trip started off for Charles to see if the Americans had a better system than the classes in England that he despised.

The movie doesn’t mention this at all, but after the first few stops, Boston, New York, Charles quickly started to go downhill. He grew tired of how enthusiastic his fans were, once writing that, “I can’t drink a glass of water, without having 100 people looking down my throat when I open my mouth to swallow.”

Or there was the time when he was in Cleveland, Ohio, and woke up to find a “party of gentlemen” watching his wife sleeping in bed.

Creepy.

Even his trip to Washington, D.C. where he hoped to learn more about American politics was overshadowed by people spitting tobacco in the city streets.

Charles wrote, “Washington may be called the headquarters of tobacco-tinctured saliva. The thing itself is an exaggeration of nastiness, which cannot be outdone.”

He’d later sum up his trip in a letter to one of his friends named William Macready by saying, “I am disappointed. This is not the Republic I came to see. This is not the Republic of my imagination.”

If you want to learn more about Charles’ trip to America in 1842, check out the travelogue he wrote while in North America called American Notes.

The last bit to mention about the opening sequence in the movie, though, has nothing to do with his trip to America. It’s that mention of the name “Boz.”

The movie’s mention there is correct. Boz was a name Charles Dickens often wrote under. It was a nickname he borrowed from his younger brother, Augustus, that they had as children. But, as his career grew, most of his friends called him Boz and he himself often referred to himself as Boz.

There was even a Boz Ball on one of the stops in the 1842 tour of North America, and in 1843 his novel The Life and Adventures of Martin Chuzzlewit listed Charles Dickens as the author but included the phrase “Edited by Boz” on the title page. So, he wrote and edited it, basically.

Speaking of Chuzzlewit, if we head back into the movie, the next bit of text we see tells us that now it’s October of 1843. That’s 16 months and, according to the movie, three flops after the American tour.

The movie even mentions Chuzzlewit when we see Charles and his friend, John Forster, at a restaurant. Miles Jupp’s character, Thackeray, comes up to the two friends at the table and talks about the vile things the reviewers wrote about Chuzzlewit.

So, that must’ve been one of the flops we just learned about that the movie doesn’t really name, right?

Well, yes … and sort of, no.

You see, many of Charles Dickens’ writings that we think of now as books were, at the time, serials. Sort of like how Charles’ second book, Oliver Twist, was published between February 1837 and April 1839 so, too, were many of his other stories after that.

After The Adventures of Oliver Twist came The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby. That was also a monthly serial, published between April of 1838 and October of 1839 — so technically, Nicholas Nickleby started publishing a year before Oliver Twist’s final chapters published.

After Nickleby, The Old Curiosity Shop was published between April of 1840 and November of 1841, and then Barnaby Rudge was also published between February and November of 1841.

Finally, the only one the movie mentions is Chuzzlewit, which was published starting in January of 1843 and up until July of 1844, which would mean it finished almost six months after the publication of A Christmas Carol in December of 1843.

So, to recap, the timeline is a little more complex than the movie makes it seem thanks to the books not publishing all at once.

Oliver Twist’s final publication came in April of 1839, and the tour we saw in the beginning the movie was in 1842.

Even though the movie doesn’t mention which three novels it’s considering to be flops, there are four that could be in the running simply based on their publication dates being right after Oliver Twist, would be Nicholas Nickleby, The Old Curiosity Shop, Barnaby Rudge and then Martin Chuzzlewit.

Interestingly, of those, Nickleby was an immediate success that only helped cement Charles Dickens as a famous writer in his time. The Old Curiosity Shop was so popular that New Yorkers stormed the wharfs when they heard about the arrival of the ship containing the first installments came in 1841.

Those last two, though, would certainly quality as the flops the movie is talking about. Barnaby Rudge, was met with criticism and not nearly as much popularity as Charles’ previous books.

But, even then, the timeline in the movie is a bit off because Barnaby Rudge was published between February and November of 1841, with the serial installments finally published into a single book after that in 1841.

So, that was before the American tour in 1842.

Charles didn’t publish any novels in 1842, but rather wrote his travelogue called American Notes about his trip to America that we learned about earlier.

American Notes didn’t sell well at all, probably because Charles was so disenchanted with his trip that it turned into what many at the time considered to be quite insulting to his fans in the United States.

And so, even though the movie doesn’t give us the title of the three flops, we can only assume those three books they’re talking about aren’t three novels but rather they must be Barnaby Rudge just before the trip, the American Notes travelogue, and then, of course, Chuzzlewit that he started on soon after his return to England.

The movie also doesn’t mention this at all, but Charles borrowed £2,000 from his publishers, Chapman and Hall, to cover both his trip to the United States and Canada along with the mere fact that he wasn’t going to be writing any new novels for an entire year.

Adding to that was another £1,000 of debt that Charles had racked up thanks to the poor sales of his book just before the tour, Barnaby Rudge.

That loan was to be paid back in the form of a new novel that Charles should begin writing as soon as he returned from North America. But, they added another stipulation to the loan that they’d take out £50 if his monthly salary of £200 if it didn’t have the sales they’d need to start paying back the loan.

Charles and Catherine began their return journey on June 7th, 1842, and then in January of 1843, the first of the Chuzzlewit stories were published.

Like the movie suggests, Chuzzlewit was significantly less popular than his previous books.

But, as we learned earlier, the timeline of the movie is also going to be a bit off because Chuzzlewit continued their monthly installments through July of 1844. So, it’s not like they were a completed book like the movie makes it seem by the time October of 1843 rolled around.

Going back to the movie, with a growing debt looming, Charles is talking with his publishers when he mentions a new book. They say, well, obviously we’d love to consider it! Wait … consider it? Charles asks.

Well, yes, if we like it … they stammer.

In a huff, Charles leaves the room. The great Charles Dickens’ writing isn’t a sure thing like it had been in the past. It’d seem they’re a bit more hesitant now that he’s had a few less-than-successful books.

And that’s true.

Granted, it didn’t happen exactly like we see in the movie, but as Charles continued to write the Chuzzlewit story, it evolved with the sales. Remember, they were published in installments as they were released. And, as sales weren’t where they wanted them to be, Charles added a bit of a stab at the United States that he thought might help increase sales in England.

In particular, many critics pointed to a part where a couple of the book’s characters are having a conversation.

“Why, I was a-thinking, sir…that if I was a painter and was called upon to paint the American Eagle, how should I do it?”

“Paint it as like an Eagle as you could, I suppose.”

“No,” said Mark. “That wouldn’t do for me, sir. I should want to draw it like a Bat, for its shortsightedness; like a Bantam, for its bragging; like a Magpie, for its honesty; like a Peacock, for its vanity, like a Ostrich, for its putting its head in the mud, and thinking nobody sees it.”

Well, needless to say, this characterization of the American Eagle didn’t win him any new fans in the United States. In fact, it lost him one of his most popular supporters in American author Washington Irving. He’s the guy who wrote The Legend of Sleepy Hollow, among other classics.

But, in England, it did help with sales. Just not as much as Charles wanted. The series’ sales increased by only about 3,000 copies, going from 20,000 to 23,000 issues being sold for The Life and Adventures of Martin Chuzzlewit.

For a bit of comparison, his hits like Nicholas Nickleby had 50,000 people buying each issue of the monthly installments while The Old Curiosity Shop boasted sales of just over 100,000 per issue.

Chuzzlewit wasn’t pulling in the numbers it needed to keep Charles’ publishers from taking that £50 out of Charles’ monthly salary that they had agreed to earlier. Even though he’d agreed to the reduced stipend should sales be low, when the time came to reduce his paycheck, Charles understandably wasn’t happy about it.

That is what caused Charles to get upset at his publishers at Chapman and Hall. It wasn’t really their hesitation over publishing his new book, like the movie shows. Although, if we could’ve been a fly on the wall for their conversations I’m sure they weren’t happy about the low sales and were, indeed, very hesitant about working with Charles any more until he’d been able to start paying back some of the money he owed them.

Charles, thoroughly upset at the low sales, a growing debt and the latest news that Chapman and Hall were going to start deducting money from his salary, he wrote a letter to his friend, John Forster, in which he promised he’d never write for Chapman and Hall again.

Then, seemingly in a move to back up his words, Charles signed an agreement with the company that was printing his books, Bradbury and Evans, to work with them to print his next book.

Back in the movie’s storyline, after storming out of his publisher’s office, Charles meets up with his friend John Forster at a restaurant and we see one of the waiters stop by. Charles asks his name, to which he says it’s Marley. Charles writes this down, saving the name for future use.

Of course, we know how he used this name — Jacob Marley, the deceased business partner of Ebenezer Scrooge.

But, is that true? Was Jacob Marley based on real person?

Well, maybe.

Even though the movie makes it seem like Charles got the name from a waiter in a restaurant, the basic gist of Charles collecting names of people he met for future use was true. It’s just that in this instance, Jacob Marley most likely didn’t come from a waiter’s name.

It’s hard to know for sure since there’s no documented proof tracking the origins of who may have been the inspiration for Jacob Marley, but according to a historian named Barry West, he believes the character was inspired by a London physician named Dr. Miles Marley.

According to Mr. West, who spent years researching the topic, there’s a newspaper clipping that suggests Dr. Marley hosted a party for St. Patrick’s Day at 11 Cork Street in Westminster, London. One of those guests invited for the celebration was none other than Charles Dickens.

So, it’d make sense that Charles and Dr. Marley had met before the event. And, according to Mr. West’s research, there’s also evidence of a conversation during the event where Charles told Marley that his name, which both agreed was unusual, would be a household word by the end of the year.

The next major plot point in the movie takes place when he’s tracked down in the crowd by a woman who says she’s a big fan. Then her husband, an older man, arrives. He’s obviously not a fan.

The interaction goes something like this:

Charles starts by asking the old man, “What don’t you like about my writing?”

It becomes clear what kind of man he is, when the old man replies with something to the effect of how “those people” don’t belong in books.

“Those people? You mean the poor? What do you think they should do with ‘those people’?”

“Aren’t there workhouses?”

This angers Charles. “You know how many people would rather die than work there?”

The old man stiffens. “Then let them! It’ll reduce the surplus population.”

Sickened, Charles leaves.

That’s when, across the street, another man calls to him.

Showing two children, he asks Charles if he wants to buy them.

“They’re small and can fit into any chimney!”

Angered by this, Charles races after the man. He loses him in the alleyway, but this leads to a graveyard where he sees a burial taking place witnessed by a single, cranky old man. We never really find out who the man was, but that man is played by Christopher Plumber, and eventually he ends up playing the character Charles creates out of this whole experience — Ebenezer Scrooge.

That’s made up for the movie, but sort of like the difference between the waiter we saw in the movie and the real person who may have been the inspiration for him, most historians believe there was a real person who was the inspiration for Ebenezer Scrooge.

The problem is — we don’t know exactly who that person was, and there’s quite a few theories out there.

Probably the most outlandish of those theories is one that most historians don’t believe to be true. That’d be the one of Ebenezer Scroggie, whose last name means “meal man” and was, according to the story, a caterer to King George IV. But, when Charles saw his gravestone, he misinterpreted the last name as “mean man” instead of “meal man”, and the character of Scrooge was born.

But, as I said, that’s most likely not true.

A more likely person to be the inspiration for Scrooge may have been a man named Jemmy Wood, who many believe to have been Britain’s first millionaire. He was a bank owner and, like Scrooge, was well-known in the time for being extremely stingy.

The idea there being that the name Scrooge stems from an old-English word meaning “squeeze.”

Or, if you remember that phrase from the old man in the movie about the poor dying to reduce the surplus population — that’s not something original from the movie. That’s something Scrooge says in A Christmas Carol, and also something that many have attributed to a political economist named Thomas Malthus.

Then again there’s another quote from Scrooge in the book that resembles someone else in history. That’d be the line where Scrooge asks, “Are there no prisons? And the Union workhouses? The treadmill and the Poor Law are in full vigour, then?”

A man named Thomas Carlyle wrote something similar when he wrote in 1840, “Are there not treadmills, gibbets; even hospitals, poor-rates, New Poor-Law?”

Maybe they all added to Scrooge — maybe there’s not just one inspiration. But, if there’s one who stands above the rest as a possible inspiration it’d probably be a man named John Elwes.

One reason many believe Scrooge’s biggest inspiration may have been Elwes is because we know Charles Dickens referenced him in another book of his, Charles’ last book called Our Mutual Friend. There are multiple references to John Elwes in that book, including one where characters talking about being very stingy with money asks, “Did you ever come across the life of Mr. Elwes?” to which the other replies, “The miser?”

Some even believe Elwes looked a lot like the character that artist John Leech ended up drawing to depict Scrooge for A Christmas Carol.

So, even though that scene we saw in the movie was an oversimplification of where the character of Scrooge came from, it is likely it came from a real person — or, perhaps, many people.

Oh, and the man’s mention of selling children to fit into chimneys? Sadly, that sort of thing was very common.

After the Great Fire of London in 1666, the city required fireplaces were built in a safer manner. That meant they were smaller, and chimney sweeps had a hard time cleaning out obstructions.

Child labor was horrible then, as well, but this was the stuff of nightmares. Children as young as four years old would be forced to shimmy up the chimney and use a brush to knock out any soot overhead. Of course, gravity would make it all fall down right on top of them.

They’d keep climbing up, knocking the soot all over themselves until they reached the top of the chimney. Then, they’d slide down and climb out, cleaning up the soot that had fallen down.

For all of that, the children usually were never paid. Their masters were paid.

Soot is described by the National Cancer Institute as the byproduct of something burning — usually wood in a fireplace. It’s a very dangerous substance that prolonged exposure to can lead to cancer.

So, as you can imagine, children who were exposed to soot for 14 to 16 hours a day meant it was common for developmental problems, disfigurement. For almost 100 years, children were dying because of this without anyone really taking notice. Then, they started to notice the prolonged exposure to soot was causing cancer in the scrotum, something they referred to as Chimney Sweep Cancer.

Sadly, that didn’t stop children chimney sweeps. And, sadly, that wasn’t the worst of how they’d die. With chimneys sometimes being as narrow as 18 inches, or about 45 centimeters, it was common for children to get stuck in the chimneys.

And once they were stuck … they would never be unstuck.

If you want to learn more about this sad and dark part of British history, check out the book by Benita Cullingford called British Chimney Sweeps: Five Centuries of Chimney Sweeping.

For our story today, though, let’s head back into the movie’s timeline.

We see Charles go back to his publishers, Chapman and Hall, where he proposes his idea for the new book. It’s a Christmas book.

Neither Chapman nor Hall are impressed. A Christmas book? Do people even celebrate Christmas anymore?

They’re clearly not too sold on the idea.

In the movie, this is when we see Charles decide he’ll publish it himself. And, we already talked about the real reason why Charles decided not to publish with Chapman and Hall anymore. But it is true that Christmas celebrations of the day weren’t anything like what they are today.

Although, it’s not like Christmas wasn’t celebrated by anyone at all.

After all, The Night Before Christmas was published in 1823, and started building some of the Christmas traditions we know of today, including the concept of St. Nick’s reindeer.

There were a lot of ancient traditions that had made their way into winter celebrations. The Scandinavian celebrations of Yule, or the winter solstice. The Roman holiday of Saturanlia, named after the god of agriculture — Saturn. And, of course, the Christian celebration of the birth of Jesus, that timed on December 25th by Pope Julius I in the 4th century.

We don’t really know why he picked that date, but because the Christian Bible never mentioned when Jesus was born and because there were already celebrations in Rome around Saturnalia, many have speculated the Pope timed it to be the same in an attempt to merge the celebrations together.

For centuries, those celebrations began to grow.

Things changed in 1645 when, under Oliver Cromwell’s Puritan reform, the church’s laws became stricter about celebrating Sunday as a holy day. As such, any other days, including Christmas, weren’t considered to be as holy as the Lord’s Day.

Like any topic dealing with religion, Cromwell’s ban on Christmas — as some historians call it — is hotly debated. But, regardless of how much of a ‘ban’ it was, it did slow the celebration of Christmas as a holiday in England for quite some time. Much of that sentiment made its way into America when settlers made their way over in the mid-to-late 1600s.

In fact, there was a five shilling fine in Boston for anyone who celebrated Christmas between the years 1651 and 1681. That wasn’t everywhere, though. There are some reports that the Jamestown settlement happily celebrated Christmas.

The American Revolution changed things in the newly-formed United States, with many of the English traditions being overturned. That included Christmas celebrations, which ramped back up.

In 1819, the American author Washington Irving wrote a series of stories about Christmas celebrations called The Sketchbook of Geoffrey Crayon. As we already learned, Washington Irving was a known supporter of Charles Dickens’ writings up until that incident with the American Eagle painting conversation.

Still, some have speculated perhaps it was this story that inspired Charles to have the idea to write a Christmas story. Although, in fact, it wasn’t going to be a Christmas story at first.

The movie doesn’t mention this at all, but the idea for A Christmas Carol was originally going to be a pamphlet that Charles gave the title of, An Appeal to the People of England on Behalf of the Poor Man’s Child.

As the title implies, the topic of the pamphlet would be to stand up for the children of England who were too poor to earn a living, forced to work in workhouses and dying in the streets at way too young of an age. That idea for the pamphlet came from a child labor report he read in the spring of 1843.

The report included stories of girls, forced to work six days a week for 16 hours a day sewing dresses. Or boys spending 11 hours a day dragging coal carts in the mine’s tiny tunnels.

Some historians suggest that revolutionaries like Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx read the same reports and imagined a revolution would be imminent. Charles, on the other hand, wasn’t a revolutionary.

He was a writer.

By the time Charles sat down to begin writing, the pamphlet idea was thrown out and instead he decided to write a story to get across the concepts of change he wanted to tell.

Speaking of sitting down to write, back in the movie, we see this start when there’s very little time left. The movie mentions there’s only six weeks to get a book out by Christmas, and Charles takes a loan out to hire an artist. That man turns out to be Charles Leech, a very well-respected artist who agrees to the tight deadline — with some extra money in there for the rush job, of course.

That’s true.

We already learned a bit about John Leech, who was indeed the artist who drew the illustrations for the first edition.

Even though his idea for the story began formulating in his mind in the spring of 1843 as we learned about with the pamphlet idea, Charles Dickens didn’t start writing A Christmas Carol until October with the intention of releasing it in time for Christmas.

It’s around here that, in the movie, we’re introduced to Charles’ sister, Francis — or Fanny, as she was called by her family and friends. She’s played by Katie McGuinness. She arrives at Charles’ home with her husband, the Reverend Henry Burnett, and their young son, Henry, Jr.

He’s played by Pearse Kearney, while the senior Henry is played by Marcus Lamb.

Charles is delighted at the arrival of his sister, which is a sentiment he doesn’t have when his mother and father arrive.

Talking about his dad, who’s played by Jonathan Pryce, Charles starts complaining about him to his sister. He tells Fanny that this morning, I had three to five shillings in my hand and now — observe the vacancy!

Then, watching his father playing with Charles’ children, Fanny says, “No one is useless in this world…” and Charles finishes, “…who lightens the burdens of another.”

That’s a quote often attributed to Charles himself, and while it’s possible he came up with it, it’s also very possible it’s something he got from his parents. If there’s one thing that’s nearly impossible to track down to their original source, it’s quotes.

What we do know, though, is that Charles Dickens did indeed have a very strained relationship with his father. Most of that revolved around money, something that John never seemed to have.

Some of that debt might be attributed to the fact that John Dickens had eight children. Trying to raise that many kids isn’t the cheapest thing to do. But, then again, Charles Dickens had ten children of his own.

So, it’d seem the biggest reason for John’s financial misfortunes just boiled down to having a poor sense of how to handle and deal with money.

We see the culmination of this animosity over money between John and Charles in the movie in the next scene. It happens as Charles is writing his book, and we see the Ghost of Christmas Past. She’s played by Anna Murphy, the same girl who plays the Irish maid in the Dickens’ home, Tara.

It’s here that the movie jumps back in time to Charles as a child. He’s only 11 years old, and John is being carted off. We don’t really know where to at this point, but John mentions something about being free once the debt is paid, so we must assume its debtors’ prison.

Behind John we can see a building with a sign that says Warren’s Blacking. In the jailor’s cart we can see John, a girl behind him and his wife, Elizabeth, holding a son. So, there’s at least two children there.

While it is true that John Dickens was sent to debtors’ prison, the way the movie shows it happening all at once isn’t accurate.

It was on February 20th, 1824 when John was sent to the Marshalsea Debtors’ Prison because of a loan in the amount of £40 and 10 shillings to a baker in town named James Kerr.

That’s not the only debt John incurred. That was just the final straw of a debt totaling £700. But …the inaccurate part in the movie isn’t John being sent to debtors’ prison. The inaccuracy was showing Elizabeth and two children being sent there at the same time.

It was in April of 1824 that Elizabeth and four of their youngest children were sent to Marshalsea with John. That’d be four of their seven children at the time. The last of their children, little Augustus Dickens, wasn’t born until 1827.

The movie is correct, though, showing that young Charles Dickens was forced to work at Warren’s Blacking Warehouse. He did get paid, but barely. Six shillings for an entire week’s worth of work.

His job there was to work ten hours a day pasting labels onto boot blacking — shoe polish.

Here’s how Charles described his days at Warren’s in a letter to John Forster many years later:

The blacking-warehouse was the last house on the left-hand side of the way, at old Hungerford Stairs. It was a crazy, tumble-down old house, abutting of course on the river, and literally overrun with rats.

Its wainscoted rooms, and its rotten floors and staircase, and the old grey rats swarming down in the cellars, and the sound of their squeaking and scuffling coming up the stairs at all times, and the dirt and decay of the place, rise up visibly before me, as if I were there again.

The counting-house was on the first floor, looking over the coal-barges and the river. There was a recess in it, in which I was to sit and work. My work was to cover the pots of paste-blacking; first with a piece of oil-paper, and then with a piece of blue paper; to tie them round with a string; and then to clip the paper close and neat, all round, until it looked as smart as a pot of ointment from an apothecary’s shop.

When a certain number of grosses of pots had attained this pitch of perfection, I was to paste on each a printed label, and then go on again with more pots. Two or three other boys were kept at similar duty down-stairs on similar wages.

One of them came up, in a ragged apron and a paper cap, on the first Monday morning, to show me the trick of using the string and tying the knot. His name was Bob Fagin; and I took the liberty of using his name, long afterwards, in Oliver Twist.

The character of Bob Fagin was very controversial for the antisemitism … but that’s a story for another day.

John’s days in debtors’ prison ended when his mother died and left him all the money she had — £450. That was immediately taken by the debtors, and along with the £146 John was being given as a pension for his time as a clerk in the Navy, things were looking up.

The Dickens family was allowed to leave prison when John agreed to declare bankruptcy and give up all his possessions while promising to pay back the rest of the debts as soon as possible. It’d be a couple more years before those were finally cleared.

The movie really focuses more on Charles’ strained relationship with his father over having to work at the workhouse due to John’s debts, but he was also bitter toward his mother. You see, after John and Elizabeth were released from prison, Charles wasn’t freed from the blacking warehouse until after a disagreement between John and Charles’ boss at the warehouse resulted in Charles getting fired.

His mom wanted him to keep working there so he could make money for the family, even though it was a meager sum, but his dad wanted Charles to go back to school — something he’d been pulled from when John had been sent to prison.

For her wanting him to go back to the blacking warehouse, Charles harbored a bitterness toward his mother that lasted until the end of his life.

Back in the movie, we see the Ghost of Christmas Present next. He’s played by Justin Edwards, the same guy who plays John Forster in the film. After a bit of explanation that the Ghost of Christmas Present is all about the gifts of abundance, goodwill and generosity, the ghost turns to Christopher Plumber’s version of Scrooge.

“But, you wouldn’t know anything about generosity, would you?”

Scrooge looks a bit sheepish.

“Unlike these people,” the ghost continues. And the scene transforms to show Bob and Mrs. Cratchit — she never really has a name, but some adaptations of the story have called her Emily.

Together with their children, Martha, Belinda, Peter, a few other unnamed kids, and the youngest, Tiny Tim. He’s very sick and must use a crutch to get around.

According to the movie, these characters are all inspired by Charles’ sister’s family — including little Henry, Jr., who we see walking with a crutch just like Tiny Tim.

Like we learned about many of the other characters for Charles’ stories, there very well could’ve been many inspirations for Tiny Tim. But, most historians agree that it was indeed Fanny’s son, Henry, Jr., who was the inspiration for Tiny Tim.

Although it’s worth pointing out that his name wasn’t always Tiny Tim. In the first draft, it was Little Fred — possibly named after one or both of Charles’ younger brothers, Frederick or Alfred.

In fact, some historians believe the sickliness of Tiny Tim was inspired by the illness of his younger brother. So, perhaps again we have a character born out of multiple real people.

Going back to the movie, we see the final of the three ghosts next. It happens while Charles is walking in the city at night.

And not to get too sidetracked, but that’s something Charles did. As biographer Claire Tomalin mentioned in her great book, Charles Dickens: A Life, during the six-week period writing A Christmas Carol and under the stress of declining sales and a growing family, Charles would walk as much as 15 to 20 miles a night around London.

That’s about 24 to 32 kilometers, by the way. During those walks, he’d focus on formulating the storyline for his book.

And so, in the movie, it’s on one of these walks that he comes across the Ghost of Christmas Yet-to-Come. The movie doesn’t show this as a character played by someone we’re already familiar with like the other two, but rather a scary-looking figure that is cloaked and towering above everyone else.

Following its finger, Charles and the host of characters in his mind that are following him find themselves in the Cratchit household. Mrs. Cratchit asks Robert if he went to the cemetery today. Yes, he replies. My little child … my little child.

Then, as the tears flow for Mr. and Mrs. Cratchit, we see Tiny Tim’s crutch, lying unused by the fireplace.

Suddenly, we’re back to reality as Charles is reading the story to Tara.

“Wait … Tiny Tim dies?”

Tara is in shock.

“No, he can’t die!”

“Well, he was very sick,” Charles says, implying that the end was inevitable.

“But, he can’t die. Scrooge must do something to fix it!” Tara cries.

Of course, that’s not exactly how it happens in the movie, but you get the idea. As dramatized as this scene is for the film, it’s very possible something that could’ve happened.

While I couldn’t find anything in my research to indicate Tiny Tim would explicitly die in the original version of A Christmas Carol, in a book called The Lives and Times of Ebenezer Scrooge by Paul Davis, he writes that Charles didn’t include that epic line confirming that, indeed, Tiny Tim did not die in the original, handwritten manuscript.

It’d seem that was added later by the time it was being printed.

As for the illness that Tiny Tim had, many have speculated as to the nature of it. The movie makes no mention of it, probably because Charles himself never clarified … but the mere fact that it must’ve been a curable illness has made many wonder about what it was.

And most doctors who have been asked this question to tend to believe it must’ve been rickets.

That’s an illness that was common for children in 19th century England where smog often prohibited the most natural source of vitamin D that kept rickets at bay.

The symptoms for rickets would be a loss of bone density and weak muscles, which would’ve led to the crutch. Eventually, it’d lead to death — something, sadly, that many suffered.

But, it was curable. If not from the sun’s vitamin D then by an improved diet. That’s something that could be improved by Cratchit getting a raise, of course.

Heading back into the movie, things end happily … much like A Christmas Carol itself.

Charles manages to get the book written in time. He sends it to the printer and then seems to wait around while it’s getting done. Charles’ relationship with his father is restored.

And finally, the text on the screen at the very end of the film mentions that the book was published on December 19th, 1843 and by Christmas Eve every single copy had been sold.

That is true.

There were 6,000 first edition copies that were printed. Granted, it’s not likely Charles was waiting around for them to print — it took two weeks between the time Charles finished writing the story and for them to be printed. By the time December 24th rolled around, all 6,000 had sold.

But, things weren’t all sunshine and happiness after this for Charles. While his relationship with his father may have been improved, it wasn’t magically solved like the movie shows. And, as we learned earlier, Charles harbored a bitterness toward his mother for the rest of his life.

Instead of being the immediate resolution to his money problems, A Christmas Carol ended up being more trouble than Charles anticipated.

After all, he was both the writer and the publisher this time around. In his mind, Charles had hoped to make £1,000 for the 6,000 copies.

And he was close — it made £992 and five shillings. But then came the expenses. £74 2s for printing, £89 2s for paper, £49 18s for the drawings, binding at £180, printing plates at £15 17s, advertising and incidentals at £168 7s, and many more expenses.

In the end, Charles Dickens made a total of £137 for the first edition of A Christmas Carol. That’s about $16,500 today. Not bad, but hardly the $118,000 today that £1,000 would’ve been back then.

Then, Charles was thrust into a battle to defend his work.

It started when the book made its way to America. In January of 1844, the American publishers Harper and Brothers advertised A Christmas Carol would be available on the 24th for only six cents a copy.

With an exchange rate of $5 to £1, the cost of five shillings for the authorized version was a lot more expensive.

The reprint by Harper was cheaply made, didn’t include any of the four original illustrations by John Leech that Charles’ authorized version did, and … well, was a blatant copyright violation.

But … it was six cents.

It sold well, but Charles never saw any of the money in royalties for it. And it didn’t stop there. Newspapers in America serialized the story and others ripped it off. For example, an author named Henry Hewitt published a book called A Christmas Ghost Story that was a little different, but not much. According to Henry, he improved and added on Charles’ original story.

Of course, Charles never saw the money from Henry’s book, either. Sure, there were copyright laws, but there hadn’t been agreements between the United States and England on those copyrights, yet.

When he wrote the book, Charles was hoping to make £1,000 in profit from his story in the weeks following its release. A full year later, he’d made a grand total of £744, or about $89,000 in today’s U.S. dollars, from A Christmas Carol.

The post 220: Classic: The Man Who Invented Christmas appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/220-classic-the-man-who-invented-christmas/feed/ 0 8199
162: Operation Finale https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/162-operation-finale/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/162-operation-finale/#respond Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:00:18 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=3627 Resources Operation Finale – Wikipedia Operation Finale (2018) – IMDb Eichmann in My Hands: A Compelling First-Person Account by the Israela Agent Who Captured Hitler’s Chief Executioner: Malkin, Peter Z., Stein, Harry Hunting Eichmann: How a Band of Survivors and a Young Spy Agency Chased Down the World’s Most Notorious Nazi: Bascomb, Neal The House […]

The post 162: Operation Finale appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

Resources

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

The movie opens with some text to set up the story. According to the movie, between 1939 and 1945, the Nazis murdered over ten million people they deemed to be enemies of the state—six million of them being European Jews. Some of the Nazi leaders including Hitler, Himmler and Goering escaped justice by taking their own lives. A decade after the war ended, most people had forgotten about the head of the SS Office of Jewish Affairs, Adolf Eichmann. Since World War II itself isn’t the focus of the movie, it’s probably not too surprising that this is a simplification of what happened during the war. But the broad strokes mentioned here are true. Let’s start with the numbers given. You might have noticed the numbers given by the movie aren’t very exact, which makes sense because we just don’t know the exact number of people who lost their lives at the hands of the Nazis. Although, it’s worth pointing out that the movie mentions the years 1939 to 1945, which are the dates during World War II. That doesn’t necessarily include the Nazi Party’s rise to power in Germany itself, which would’ve been from the years 1933 to 1939. Well, I guess one could argue they began their rise to power before 1933 since there was the whole Beer Hall Putsch in 1923 that sent Hitler to prison where he wrote Mein Kampf, but 1933 is when they took over power in Germany as the ruling party. Of course, today we know the mass murder by the Nazis as the Holocaust—a word coming from two Greek words, “Holo” meaning “whole” and “Kaustos” meaning burned. Most historians would agree with the number the movie gave of over ten million people targeted and murdered with six million of them being Jews. Some would put that number even higher at 11 million. So, we don’t really have exact numbers. And just like the movie implies, there were millions more beyond the Jews that were targeted and lost their lives during the Holocaust. You see, as they rose to power, the Nazis targeted anyone who opposed their political views. They targeted people that didn’t fit into their ideology. And while it is true that the Jews suffered some of the greatest losses during the Holocaust, they weren’t the only group of people who were targeted for genocide by the Nazis. Roma, Slavs, ethnic Poles, homosexuals, black Germans, even smaller groups like Jehovah’s Witnesses were murdered. As for the movie’s mention of Hitler, Himmler and Goering escaping justice by taking their own lives, that is also true. Being a fan of history, I’m sure you know that Adolf Hitler shot himself on April 30th, 1945 as the Third Reich was collapsing fast and the Soviet Army closed in on Berlin from the east and the Western Allies pushing through Germany from the west. He ordered his body and the body of Eva Braun to be burned. Eva was the woman Hitler had married in the late hours of the 28th or early morning hours of the 29th. Since Hitler and Braun’s bodies were burned and buried after their deaths, well, we don’t have them. We only know what happened from eyewitness statements from people who were in the bunker at the time. As you can imagine, since we don’t have Hitler’s remains, there are plenty of conspiracy theories around Hitler’s death. But we’ll leave those alone for now. Those are stories for a different time. Heinrich Himmler also committed suicide, but in a bit of a different manner than Hitler. As the Third Reich was crumbling in early 1945, it became evident to some of Hitler’s circle that Himmler wanted Hitler’s job once Hitler was out of the picture—which seemed to be approaching fast the way the war was going. So, by the time the Soviet Army had pushed their way near and into Berlin in April of 1945, Himmler decided it was time to circumvent Hitler’s leadership altogether. He reached out to a Swiss diplomat to try and broker a deal in which he basically agreed to join the British and American-led Western Allies in a fight against the Soviet Union. Hitler found out about it, though, and ordered Himmler stripped of his rank and arrested. Himmler managed to escape, but he ended up getting captured by the Western Allies. It was then that Himmler committed suicide by poison. That leaves us with the last of the Nazi leadership the movie mentions taking their own lives, Hermann Goering. It is true that he committed suicide, but again the manner of his death was different than either Hitler or Himmler. While Goering captured by the Western Allies like Himmler, unlike Himmler, Goering was put on trial at Nuremberg. During those trials, Goering was one of many Nazis who defended themselves against four counts. They were: • Count One: The Common Plan or Conspiracy • Count Two: Crimes Against Peace • Count Three: War Crimes • Count Four: Crimes Against Humanity Goering was found guilty of all four counts and condemned to be hanged. Goering entered a plea that he be shot instead of hanged. That plea was refused, and Goering was sentenced to be hanged with ten other top Nazi officials. About two hours before the sentence was to be carried out in the early morning hours of October 16th, 1946, Goering used a potassium cyanide pill he had hidden away in his hair pomade container. The final man mentioned during the opening text in the movie is, of course, one of the main characters in the movie: Adolf Eichmann. As you can probably guess, he was a very real person. And he was, as the movie says, who was an SS officer and the Head of Jewish Affairs office. That means Adolf Eichmann was one of the primary organizers of the Holocaust. That’s not to say Hitler, Himmler and Goering weren’t involved. They were. After all, Himmler was the head of the SS and one of the most powerful men in Nazi Germany. But it was Eichmann who another top-ranking SS officer named Reinhard Heydrich called on to organize the deportation of Jews from occupied Poland as early as 1939. We learned about Heydrich, whose brutality earned him the nickname “The Butcher of Prague”, way back on episode #12 of Based on a True Story when we covered the movie Anthropoid. Speaking of movies, let’s head back to today’s movie now, where we see an opening sequence takes place in Austria in 1954. Peter Malkin, who is played by Oscar Isaac in the movie, knocks on a door. A man by the name of Werner answers and almost immediately, two others with Peter drag the man away. Inside, Peter confronts the man’s wife and children. She says her name is Annie, but Peter disagrees. No, your name is Vera. Looking down at her children, Peter tells her that her sons are Klaus and Dieter. Just then, a little girl steps from behind her mother’s skirt. This family doesn’t have two sons—they have one son and one daughter. Suddenly, a shot rings out. Realizing his mistake, Peter rushes outside to tell the others. They have the wrong family. But it’s too late, the man has been killed. Greg Hill’s version of Moshe Tabor says something to the effect of, “So what? He was a Nazi. I’ll bet he was on someone’s list.” After this opening sequence, we hear Ben Kingsley’s version of Adolf Eichmann talking about how they killed a man in Austria they mistook for him—for Eichmann. Although I couldn’t find anything in my research to suggest this specific scene happened the way we see in the movie, it is true that the search for Eichmann sent a lot of people down a lot of wrong paths since the end of World War II. And it’d seem some of those searches included talking to Vera Liebel, whom the movie correctly shows as being Adolf Eichmann’s wife. For example, in 2007 the CIA declassified a formerly secret document that explained that the United States’s Counter Intelligence Corps tried to track down Eichmann’s whereabouts as early as 1946—so the same year as the Nuremberg trials. To quote from that document: “According to one CIC source, Eichmann was believed to be living in Upper Bavaria, while his wife lived in Austria as did his parents-in-law. CIC subsequently went and interviewed Vera Liebel, Eichmann’s former wife in Alt Aussee in November 1946. Liebel told the Army’s investigator that she had not seen Eichmann since sometime in April 1945 when he visited her and their three children.” It’s worth mentioning that the CIA document calls Vera Liebel the “former” wife of Eichmann. The two were married in 1935, but I couldn’t find any documentation to prove they were ever divorced. And since the CIA seems to have been able to track down Vera rather quickly, I’m assuming they’re using that terminology in the document because, at the time, they assumed the two were no longer together with Eichmann being on the run and all. That same document also mentions Rabbi Abraham Kalmanowitz from New York who, in 1953, petitioned then-President Dwight D. Eisenhower to try and demand Eichmann’s extradition. At that time, Kalmanowitz thought Eichmann was in the Middle East somewhere. Of course, we all know how secretive the CIA can be, so it’s not like Israel’s Mossad would necessarily know about all that information at the time. Looking back on this from a historical lens, we know there were numerous sources in the early 1950s that claimed to have seen Eichmann in a variety of different places: Egypt, Italy, Syria, Germany, and so on. It’s only with that historical look that we’re able to know Eichmann’s path from Germany to where he was ultimately captured in Argentina. Or, perhaps I should say recaptured. You see, soon after the war was over, Adolf Eichmann was captured by the U.S. military. He spent time in prison camps using fake papers he had made. That assumed name was Otto Eckmann. It’s important to keep in mind that at this time he was imprisoned as any German soldier, so it wasn’t a maximum-security prison or anything like that. Oh, and I probably should point out even though we know him as Adolf Eichmann, his full name was Otto Adolf Eichmann. So, Otto Eckmann wasn’t much of a change. So, it’s probably not too surprising that it didn’t take long for him to believe his real identity was discovered. He managed to escape before they did anything about it, though, and fled to a small town in northern Germany. Using his contacts, he had more forged documents. This time with the name Otto Heninger. While I could never find any documentation to prove the Nuremberg trials played a part in his decision to leave Europe altogether, it wouldn’t surprise me if they did. You see, this was 1946, about the same time that Eichmann’s role in the Holocaust was starting to unfold at the Nuremberg trials. But leaving Europe would take more time. Using his connections again, Eichmann enlisted the help of a Nazi sympathizing Bishop in Italy to get him a passport for Argentina. That passport was issued by the Italian delegation of the Red Cross of Geneva and was under another fake name: Ricardo Klement. Of course, that’s the name we hear in the movie. And so, on June 17th, 1950, Eichmann left Germany and made his way to Argentina under the name Ricardo Klement. He landed in Argentina a little less than a month later, on July 14th. Initially, Eichmann found work as Ricardo Klement for a government contractor. But then he started to establish more roots. In 1952, Eichmann’s family arrived in Argentina and Eichmann himself got a job at Mercedes-Benz. Not to get too far ahead of our story, but eight years later, in 1960, Eichmann and his family built the house at 14 Garibaldi Street in Buenos Aires that we see depicted in the movie. Meanwhile, he isn’t in the movie at all, but in 1953, Holocaust survivor Simon Wiesenthal received a letter that Adolf Eichmann had been seen in Argentina. In fact, it’d be that tip that would eventually lead to Eichmann’s capture as it helped authorities realize he was in Argentina instead of all those other places. As a quick side note, I’m guessing he wasn’t included in the movie because Simon didn’t go to Argentina on the mission itself. Speaking of the movie, let’s head back to the movie’s timeline now to find out how they identify Eichmann’s location. We’re in Buenos Aires, Argentina in the year 1960. It’s here that a young girl named Sylvia Hermann meets a young boy named Klaus Eichmann. They hit it off and before long we see the two having dinner together with Sylvia’s father, Lothar. Over the dinner table, Lothar asks Klaus about his father. Klaus says he was in the SS during the war, but he was killed in the east. Now they live with Ricardo, their uncle. After a toast to Klaus’s father, Lothar asks if he’d recognize his father’s name. The camera cuts away before we hear Klaus reply, but during the next scene we find out he must’ve said Adolf Eichmann’s name because at Mossad Headquarters in Tel Aviv, Israel, they talk about getting a lead from Lothar Hermann on the whereabouts of Eichmann. As it turns out, Lothar was Jewish and spent time in one of the concentration camps, Dachau. But he never told his daughter they were Jewish, instead raising her as a Catholic. So that’s how the movie sets up how they got the lead on Adolf Eichmann. The basic gist of this is true, but there’s more to the story. Oh, and in Peter Malkin’s book called Eichmann in My Hands that was one of the sources for the movie, he mentions Lothar Hermann recalled the name Nicolas Eichmann as someone his daughter had met. Although, the real Adolf Eichmann’s oldest son was named Klaus. He didn’t have a son named Nicolas, although some sources suggest Nick or Nicolas was a nickname for Klaus. But then again, other sources do say Lothar’s daughter, Sylvia, started dating Klaus. So, it’s possible he was using an assumed name or maybe Lothar simply misremembered the name. That’s nitpicking though. One little tidbit that I found interesting in my research was that it wasn’t only Klaus who bragged about his father’s role in the war like we see in the movie. In fact, the real Adolf Eichmann did that himself. I couldn’t find anything to indicate the Mossad knew about this at the time, but we know now that for about four months in 1956, a Nazi journalist named Willem Sassen interviewed Eichmann about his time during the war. Sassen was planning on writing a biography about Eichmann…but those notes, tapes and transcripts ended up being used for articles in Life magazine in the United States and Stern magazine in Germany in 1960 after Eichmann was captured. As for Lothar Hermann, his role in Eichmann’s capture was an important one, although there’s a key difference the movie doesn’t show that I’ll circle back to here in a moment. Lothar was blind, like the movie shows. And he was also a German Jew. He had spent time in the Dachau concentration camp—in fact, that’s where he was blinded as a result of the beatings he received there. As far as I can tell, one of the key reasons he was in Dachau wasn’t only because of being a Jew but because he was a socialist. His arrest was for spying on Hitler’s regime. As I mentioned earlier, differing political views often meant you’d end up in a camp…especially as the Nazis were rising to power. Escaping Dachau, Lothar left Germany before the war officially broke out when he moved to Argentina in 1938 after Kristallnacht. But Lothar had experienced enough of the Nazi Party to recognize the name Eichmann years later when his daughter dated someone with that last name. But not right away. Heading back into the movie’s timeline, Sylvia Hermann agrees to show the Mossad agents the Eichmann home. Sylvia makes up some story about trying to make up with Klaus after a fight. That’s her reason for showing up at the Eichmann’s home. Meanwhile, she leads the Mossad agents to their home, and we can see one of the agents taking photos of Adolf Eichmann from afar. This is where I’ll circle back to the key difference that I mentioned earlier. Even though the movie heavily implies the Mossad relied on Lothar’s tip and used Sylvia as a kind of bait to get Adolf Eichmann’s photo, it’d seem that’s not necessarily true. Although it is true that she went to Eichmann’s house. But not necessarily the one we see in the movie. So, the movie is showing the timeline here as being after 1960. As we learned earlier, that would mean Eichmann’s family would be living at the house on Garibaldi Street in Buenos Aires. Let’s unravel what really happened. According to Neal Bascomb’s book called Hunting Eichmann, it was in 1957 that Sylvia noticed something in the newspaper that caught her eye. In an article talking about some of the Nazi trials, it mentioned the role of someone named Adolf Eichmann. As you recall, earlier I mentioned that Eichmann’s role in the Holocaust was brought up during the trials at Nuremberg. Probably one of the most prominent people who mentioned Eichmann’s name was Rudolf Hoss, who explained in great detail how Himmler had told him that he would be reporting to Eichmann and how he, Hoss, started testing techniques for mass murder at Auschwitz. At least, that’s what happened in the trial’s testimony. I don’t know how much of those details made their way into the article Sylvia read. But the name Eichmann caught her eye because she had dated Klaus Eichmann. She showed the article to her father and he reached out to the prosecutors mentioned in the article. When they replied, they asked for an address for the Eichmanns. That posed a bit of a problem since Sylvia had never gotten Klaus’s home address, even though they saw each other for a short period of time. He had only asked that if she were to write him that she do so through a mutual friend. Which sounds kind of like a red flag right there, but maybe that’s just me. After asking around a bit, they managed to find it: 4261 Chacabuco Street, where the Eichmanns lived before moving to the house they built at Garibaldi Street. And so, it was at this house that Sylvia showed up to verify it was, indeed, the Eichmann’s residence. But just like we see in the movie, Adolf Eichmann never said his name was Adolf Eichmann. He did admit to being Klaus’s father, which would imply his last name was also Eichmann. After what must’ve been an incredibly tense few moments as Sylvia was standing in the house of someone she thought might be a mass murderer, Klaus arrived at the house. We see something similar to this happen in the movie. Just like we see there, Klaus was surprised to find Sylvia there. I don’t know the specifics of what they said, but before long Klaus walked Sylvia to the bus stop where she made her way home. Once she got there, she told her dad what had happened, and he relayed that information to the prosecutors from the article. Those people, in turn, relayed the information to Mossad. Of course, the movie doesn’t show that in January of 1958, the Mossad sent an operative named Emanuel Tamor to Argentina to verify the lead. Tamor said it’s not the Eichmann’s home. Adolf Eichmann was a man of great importance. He wouldn’t live in such a shabby house. It wasn’t until someone else sent along some proof that the same house the Hermanns had mentioned was indeed the Eichmann’s home. This is where some sources get a little fuzzy on what exactly happened next. Some of the books and articles that I read while researching this story simply mention that we don’t know for sure what the proof was. Maybe it’s still a secret that hasn’t been declassified. But, as best as I can tell, it involves two more characters we see in the movie: Fritz Bauer and Isser Harel. Bauer is played by Rainer Reiners while Harel is played by Lior Raz. Harel was the head of the Mossad at the time, so when Tamor reported that it wasn’t likely to be Eichmann’s home, he was prepared to drop the lead. Fritz Bauer was the attorney general of the then-West German state of Hesse. As a Jew, he wanted to help bring Nazis to justice. After Tamor’s report, Bauer ended up going to Jerusalem himself in December of 1959 to deliver some proof. We don’t really know what the proof was, but Bauer also claimed to have a former SS officer who could verify it. So, Harel was pressured to reopen the Eichmann case. Whatever the proof was, soon after this is when the Mossad started planning the raid…starting with getting proof that it was Eichmann. That’s when they found out the Eichmanns had moved to their new home on Garibaldi Street. That’s where, just like we see in the movie, they figured out a way to snap photos of Eichmann in his backyard. It was Zvi Aharoni, who is played by Michael Aronov in the movie, who used a camera hidden in a bag to take photos of Adolf Eichmann in his backyard. That happened on March 19th, 1960. That was the proof they needed that it was indeed Adolf Eichmann. The mission was a go. Oh, and it’s probably worth pointing out that after Eichmann was captured, Lothar Hermann tried to collect a $10,000 reward offered for information leading to the capture. He was denied initially. It wasn’t until over a decade later, in 1971, that he was finally paid—just three years before Lothar Hermann’s death. Back in the movie, after identifying Adolf Eichmann, the team of Mossad agents manage to abduct him one evening. It happens after Eichmann gets off a bus and is walking down the road. Peter Malkin is walking the other direction and soon after passing by, Peter grabs Eichmann from behind and drags him into the ditch by the side of the road. Some of the other agents in a nearby car pull up and force Eichmann into the back seat of the car before heading off. The movie does a pretty good job of showing how it happened, even down to Oscar Isaac’s version of Peter Malkin asking Eichmann if he had a moment in Spanish to catch him off guard. It was May 11th, 1960. The group of Mossad agents had been watching Eichmann’s routines for about a month at that point and had decided it would be best to grab him after he got home from work in the evening. He took a bus and the bus stop was a little distance from his house, so that meant for a time Eichmann would be walking alone. Except, this time something was wrong. When the bus Eichmann was always on arrived, he wasn’t on it. The agents tried to figure out what to do. Had someone tipped Eichmann off of their plan? Should they abandon it? Should they continue? I’m sure there were plenty of questions that went through their minds. About half an hour after the bus that normally brought Eichmann home arrived, another one showed up. Eichmann got off. Malkin was the first to interact with Eichmann, as I mentioned earlier and just like we see in the movie. Once Eichmann realized what was going on, he tried to flee but two other Mossad agents helped Malkin wrestle Eichmann to the ground. From there, they moved him to a nearby car where they him on the floor under a blanket as they made their way to one of three safe houses they had set up for this purpose. Going back to the movie, there’s a problem that arises after they abduct Eichmann. They’re in a safehouse when they find out El Al, the airline they used to get there, won’t send an airplane to get them without a signed document from Eichmann that he’s willingly going to Israel. Of course, why would the Nazi architect of the Holocaust willingly go to Israel? Seems like an impossible task. But, over time, Oscar Isaac’s version of Peter Malkin is able to convince Eichmann to do exactly that. That is…well, let’s call it partially true. I couldn’t find anything in my research that would seem to back up the movie’s plot line where the agents had to get Adolf Eichmann to sign a document before the airline El Al would send an airplane to get them out. That said, they did have Eichmann in the safe house for a total of nine days. The reason they waited, though, wasn’t necessarily to get him to sign a document that would allow them to leave. Instead, it was for two reasons: First, they wanted to double-check his identity—you know, to make sure they have the right person. Secondly, the head of the Mossad, Isser Harel was there at the safe house to oversee the operation and he had received a report that Josef Mengele was also in Buenos Aires. So, they were looking for him and hoping they could bring Eichmann and Mengele back to Israel on the same flight. Mengele, of course, was also known by the nickname “Angel of Death” because of the horrible things he did as an SS doctor at Auschwitz. However, with all that said, I don’t mean to make it sound like they didn’t get Adolf Eichmann to sign a document that he was willing to return to Israel for judgment. For this part of the true story, though, I’ll refer to an interview with Zvi Aharoni where he took issue with the idea that it was Peter Malkin who spoke to and convinced Eichmann to sign a document that he’s willing to go back to Israel. Here’s a quote from that interview: “In the safe house I was the one who interrogated Eichmann and the only one who was allowed to talk to him. As Eichmann’s interrogator, I was surprised to discover two things: first, how pathetic this man was who had conducted a vast and well-oiled system of mass annihilation; and second, that Eichmann had not insisted that his children change their name, and that they were still called Eichmann. “When I asked him about this, he said he could not force them to change their name. I also persuaded him to come to Israel for judgment and got him to sign a letter stating that he was willing to go to Israel. The [general wording for the] text was provided to me by Haim Cohn [the attorney general]. Cohn thought this would facilitate the trial and might be of help if we were caught before leaving Argentine territory. “Zvi Malkin did not speak German, and did not get Eichmann to sign the document stating that he was willing to go to Israel. I was the one who drew up the document with Eichmann, carefully and thoroughly, and after it was formulated I had him sign it. Avrum Shalom can testify to that.” The article then goes on to interview Avrum Shalom who confirms what Aharoni said as well as Rafi Eitan, who is played by Nick Kroll in the movie. The real Eitan confirmed that it was only Aharoni who spoke to Eichmann in the safe house. That’s a fascinating article filled with great interviews of the real people that I’ll make sure to include in the resources for this episode over at basedonatruestorypodcast.com. Oh, and as a quick side note, during one of the conversations as Peter is shaving Eichmann, Eichmann says something to the effect of how he tried to save some Jews by sending them to Madagascar. He also mentions how he negotiated with Doctor Kasztner in Hungry to trade trucks for lives. Eichmann goes on to call Kastner a hero…but “your people” shot him in cold blood. “Your people”, of course, being how Eichmann refers to the Jews. That is actually true. In August of 1940, Adolf Eichmann released a plan called the Madagascar Project. The plan called for a million Jews per year to be moved to Madagascar for the next four years. And it might have happened, too, if it weren’t for the British. You see, right around that time was the Battle of Britain. What the Germans thought would be something that would force the British into a peace settlement ended up being a British victory. As a part of the Madagascar Project, it relied on the British not being at war with the Germans since the British fleet had a decent grasp on the Atlantic waterways they’d use to transport all those people. Some sources I saw even suggest that the Germans wanted to use British merchant ships to help with the transport. But, with the British defeating the Germans in the Battle of Britain, the Madagascar Project was put on an indefinite hold and it never came to fruition. That brings us to the brief mention of Dr. Kasztner. That’s another thing that really happened—even the part where Ben Kinsley’s version of Adolf Eichmann implies that Kasztner was a Jew who was shot by the Jews. Dr. Rudolf Kasztner was a Hungarian-Jewish journalist and lawyer. In exchange for gold, money and precious stones, he negotiated with Adolf Eichmann in 1944 at a point when the Nazis were shipping some 12,000 or so Jews from Hungary to Auschwitz each day. In return for the payment, Kasztner was able to save over 1,600 Jews on what we now know as the Kastzner train. That train consisted of 35 cattle trucks that made its way to safety in Switzerland, arriving toward the end of 1944. And it is true that Kastzner would end up being assassinated in Israel after being accused of being a Nazi collaborator. The Israeli government sued the newsletter who accused Kastzner on his behalf. Apparently, what had happened was that Kasztner learned of the mass murder in Auschwitz in April or May of 1944. The accusations against him said that instead of trying to warn a large number of Jews, he used the time to smuggle out a small number of people, including some wealthy who paid their own way to safety as well as Kasztner’s own family and 388 people from the ghetto of his home town. So, basically, they accused Kasztner of using the information about the mass murders at Auschwitz in a self-serving manner to save people he knew instead of the community at large. The government lost the case with the judge determining Kasztner had “sold his soul to the devil.” In March of 1957, Dr. Kastzner was assassinated in Tel Aviv, Israel. The next major plot point in the movie happens when the Mossad agents sneak Adolf Eichmann out of the safehouse. The way the movie shows this, they have to sneak him out of the back door because some Nazis are looking for him. We haven’t really talked about them too much up until this point, but this group of Nazis are under the leadership of someone named Carlos Fuldner and includes Eichmann’s son, Klaus. With the Nazis searching the streets for Eichmann and the agents wearing airline outfits as a disguise, they sneak Adolf Eichmann out of the back to a nearby car. Oh! And I didn’t mention this, but their plan was to drug Eichmann to make him look like he’s drunk…so that way he won’t call out for help. This is probably the biggest inaccuracy in the movie. It is true the plan was for the Mossad agents to dress as flight attendants and smuggle Eichmann out on an El Al aircraft by drugging him. In the movie, the doctor they bring along to administer the injection is a woman named Hanna Elian. She’s played by Mélanie Laurent in the movie. In truth, the doctor on the mission was a man by the name of Dr. Yonah Elian. They changed him to a woman in the movie to give a love interest to Oscar Isaac’s character, Peter Malkin. But it is true that Dr. Elian injected Adolf Eichmann with a sedative so they could pass him off as a drunken flight attendant to smuggle him onto the El Al plane and out of Argentina. What isn’t true is that Eichmann’s son and some other Nazis in the area were searching for Eichmann and were so close to catching the agents that they had to sneak out the back door to avoid the Nazis at the front. It also isn’t true that a Nazi in the air traffic control center hid the documents they needed to take off the plane in a way that forced Malkin to deliver the documents and watch as the rest of the agents took off just as Nazis arrived at the airport. With that said, there was a search for Eichmann after he went missing. His immediate family called local hospitals thinking something had happened to him. They didn’t call the police, though. While they did have some connections with Nazi sympathizers, a lot of their old Nazi friends had heard of Adolf Eichmann’s capture and fled so they wouldn’t be caught next. So, there wasn’t much of a search for Eichmann. In truth, the mission went off without a hitch. They took Eichmann to the airport and the guards there believed he was a drunken flight attendant. Without any trouble, they were able to board the plane and leave. Although, Malkin wasn’t on board. Not because he had to deliver documents but rather because he didn’t even go to the airport with the rest of the agents. That wasn’t part of the plan. There were six operatives who went on the plane with Eichmann. Malkin and the four other operatives on the team stayed behind. They had to clean up the safe house, return cars they had used in the operation, and so on. Once they did that, two of the operatives left by way of plane while the other three, including Malkin, took a train to Chile where they waited for a flight out of the country. There wasn’t one scheduled for at least a week. Meanwhile, the other operatives arrived in Israel with Eichmann on May 22nd, 1960. On May 24th, the Prime Minister of Israel made this announcement: “I have to inform the Knesset that, some time ago, Israeli security forces found one of the greatest Nazi criminals, Adolf Eichmann, who, together with other Nazi leaders, is responsible for what they termed The Final Solution of the Jewish question, in other words, the extermination of six million European Jews. Adolf Eichmann is already in this country under arrest and will shortly be brought to trial.” Antisemitism erupted in Argentina among Nazi sympathizers who realized what had happened. While the movie doesn’t get into this side of it, in the weeks after Eichmann’s arrival in Israel, the Argentine government appealed to the United Nations Security Council. There was a debate that ensued. On one side, the Argentine government claimed the mission was a violation of Argentine law and their sovereignty. The Israeli representative said the men who captured Eichmann weren’t working for the Israeli government. They were private citizens. The UNSC declared on June 23rd that Argentinian sovereignty had been violated. Then, after negotiations, on August 3rd, Argentina and Israel released a joint statement that basically said Israel would admit the mission was a violation of Argentine sovereignty, but they were both going to drop the dispute. At the very end of the movie, time passes a bit. We see a date of 1961. We’re in Jerusalem now as we see a few snippets of Adolf Eichmann’s trial. He’s sitting in a glass box in front of a bench of men. Behind those men is a massive audience watching the trial. Ghastly footage from the Holocaust is being shown for everyone—including Eichmann. We don’t get a lot of the trial itself, but at the very end of the movie there is some text on the screen that explains what happened. According to the movie, Adolf Eichmann was hanged on June 1st, 1962 after being found guilty of transporting millions of people to their deaths. It also says his trial was televised globally, making it the first time that eyewitness testimony of the Holocaust was seen by the world. His remains were cremated and spread in the sea so he will not have a final resting place. Since the focus of the movie is the mission to capture Eichmann and not his trial, this is a very high-level overview but generally speaking that’s pretty accurate. Immediately after his arrival in Israel, Adolf Eichmann spent the next nine months at a heavily fortified police station while he was questioned. They gathered this evidence to use in the trial, and during this time Eichmann openly admitted to many things but also insisted he was acting on orders. He was just doing what he was told to do. We can get a sense for the wording he used from a handwritten document by Adolf Eichmann where he made a plea to the judge during his trial. It was made public in 2016. Here’s a quote from that document, which was written by Eichmann on May 29th, 1962: “There is a need to draw a line between the leaders responsible and the people like me forced to serve as mere instruments in the hands of the leaders. I was not a responsible leader, and as such do not feel myself guilty.” He also said, “It is also incorrect that I never let myself be influenced by human emotions. Specifically, after having witnessed the outrageous human atrocities, I immediately asked to be transferred. Also, during the police investigation I voluntarily revealed horrors that had been unknown until then, in order to help establish the indisputable truth.” Finally, he asked for a pardon: “I am not able to recognize the court’s ruling as just, and I ask, Your Honor Mr. President, to exercise your right to grant pardons, and order that the death penalty not be carried out.” His request for a pardon was denied. At the beginning of this episode I mentioned the four counts that Hermann Goering was charged with during the trials at Nuremburg. On December 12th, 1961, Adolf Eichmann was convicted on 15 counts of war crimes, crimes against humanity, membership in a criminal organization and crimes against the Jewish people. Three days later the sentence was handed down. Death by hanging. But Eichmann and his lawyers appealed the verdict, so it went to the Israeli Supreme Court. Even we don’t see any of this in the movie, there is something we see happen in the movie that happened during this time. While the appeal was being heard, one of the people who wrote to ask for clemency—mercy—on Adolf Eichmann’s behalf, was his wife—Vera. When it became obvious the appeal wouldn’t go through, Vera asked the judge for something else. She asked to see her husband. In the movie, we see this as a request that Oscar Isaac’s version of Peter Malkin promises to Adolf Eichmann in exchange for Eichmann’s signing the document at the safe house in Argentina. That visit did happen, but it’d seem it was coordinated by Dov Yosef, the justice minister at the time. He determined that Israel would receive international criticism if they denied Vera’s request. So, they let the meeting happen on one condition. That condition was that she would see him and then, within 24 hours, leave the country. They also made sure the two were never alone together so she couldn’t slip him something he could take to prevent them from administering justice as the movie pointed out had happened for Hitler, Himmler and Goering. Adolf Eichmann’s appeal to the Israeli Supreme Court was officially denied on May 31st at 8:00 PM local time. A few minutes past midnight on June 1st, 1960 the sentence was carried out. As the story goes, his final words were: “Long live Germany. Long live Argentina. Long live Austria. These are the three countries with which I have been most connected and which I will not forget. I greet my wife, my family and my friends. I am ready. We’ll meet again soon, as is the fate of all men. I die believing in God.” However, one of the men who was involved in capturing Eichmann was also at the hanging. That’d be Rafi Eitan, who is played by Nick Kroll in the movie. In 2014, Rafi explained that after Eichmann said those words, he uttered one more thing under his breath. Eichmann’s final words were actually one last message of hatred directed at his Jewish captors: “I hope that all of you will follow me.” Just like the movie says, Adolf Eichmann’s body was cremated and scattered in the Mediterranean Sea. If we head back to the movie, something we didn’t really talk about much was Peter’s sister and her three children. We see her throughout the movie in flashbacks and get the story that she was murdered by Nazis somewhere in the woods. Her name, we learned earlier when Malkin was talking to Eichmann about her, was Fruma. Then, in the final moments of the movie, she shows up again. Her showing up at the end of the movie is clearly something Peter’s imagining, but she kisses him on the cheek before going peacefully into the woods with her kids. It’s a sort of peace as if to say, “Thank you” for helping to bring the architect of her murder and the murder of millions more to justice. Then, in the text at the end of the movie, it says that Peter kept the mission to capture Eichmann a secret from his mother until she was on her deathbed. When he finally told her about the mission, her reply was simply, “I knew you wouldn’t forget Fruma.” Fruma was a real person and she really was Peter Malkin’s sister. His book is dedicated to her. It’s also true that Peter told his mother about the mission on her deathbed. Even though everyone in the world knew about how Eichmann had been captured, they didn’t know the details of it. Like most top-secret missions, the details were still classified at that time. And while the exact words the movie mentions aren’t the ones he has in his book when he told his mother, the idea is basically the same. Fruma was never forgotten.

The post 162: Operation Finale appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/162-operation-finale/feed/ 0 3627
144: First Man https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/144-first-man/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/144-first-man/#respond Wed, 20 Nov 2019 11:00:19 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=3224 Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one! Buy me a coffee Resources Apollo 11 Mission Overview Apollo 11 Video Library Apollo 11 Flight Journal – Day 1, part 1: Launch [RAW VIDEO] Neil Armstrong’s 1968 Test Crash – YouTube May 25, 1961: JFK’s Moon Shot Speech to Congress Apollo 1 Apollo 1 […]

The post 144: First Man appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Resources

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

The movie opens focused on Ryan Gosling’s version of Neil Armstrong. Of course, we can’t really see that it’s him yet.
It’s dark.
Neil is wearing what looks like a space suit. It’s a very loud and bumpy—not really a nice, leisurely flight. But then again, the view outside isn’t quite what you’d normally see on a nice, leisurely flight.
The event we’re seeing here to open up the movie actually did happen, but before we get to that let’s learn a bit about Neil Armstrong’s life up until this point because I felt that was something missing from the movie.
Neil Armstrong was born on August 5th, 1930 in the small town of Wapakoneta in Ohio. That’s about 76 miles, or 122 kilometers, to the west of Columbus, Ohio and 60 miles, or 100 kilometers, to the east of Fort Wayne, Indiana. Today, you can find the Armstrong Air & Space Museum in Wapakoneta.
His family stayed in Ohio through World War II, but in 1945, Neil was one of thousands of fans in Columbus watching the home state Ohio State Buckeyes get defeated 35-13 by the visiting Purdue Boilermakers.
As the story goes, it was that game that convinced a young Neil Armstrong to change his college plans from MIT to Purdue.
After graduating from Purdue University in Indiana, Neil Armstrong joined the U.S. Navy. That’s not too surprising, though, when you consider that his college was paid for by the Navy as part of the Holloway Plan—a program named after Rear Admiral James Holloway in the post-World War II U.S. military that partnered with colleges to provide education for future officers.
The way that program worked was you did two years of college, then you’d do two years of flight training followed by one year of service in the Navy as an aviator, and finally go back to college to finish the last two years of your degree. That was the deal to get the Navy to pay for your college, and that’s the deal Neil agreed to.
He started college in 1947 when he was only 17 years old. Two years later, in 1949, Neil reported to his flight training in the U.S. Navy. It only took about a year, but on August 23rd, 1950, Neil Armstrong graduated training and became a full-fledged naval aviator.
Of course, as a fan of history, you might have an idea of what else was going on around this time. Just a few months before Neil Armstrong’s graduation, on June 25th, 1950, the United Nations officially condemned the North Korean government’s actions as they invaded South Korea. That kicked off the United States’s involvement in the Korean War.
Neil Armstrong flew a total of 78 missions during the Korean War with his final being in March of 1952, not long after the stalemate of the Korean War started but before the July 1953 signing of the Korean Armistice Agreement that brought a ceasefire.
It was after the war that Neil returned to Purdue to finish out his degree. The next few years would significantly change Neil’s life. He graduated from Purdue in 1955. That’s where he met Janet Shearon. The two were married on January 28th, 1956.
Between his graduation in 1955 and marrying Janet in 1956, though, Neil got a job in Cleveland, Ohio as a test pilot for the Lewis Flight Propulsion Laboratory. He had applied to the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics—NACA, who was the predecessor for NASA—but they didn’t have any positions open right away. Eventually they did, though, and by the time the summer of 1955 rolled around, Neil was working at NACA as an experimental test pilot.
Back in the movie, we’re still inside Neil Armstrong’s cockpit in that opening sequence of the film. The camera cuts to a shaky view outside the windows of the aircraft we can see that Neil is piloting. He’s just above the clouds. Pulling back on the stick, Neil forces the plane higher. We can see the numbers on the altimeter climbing as the plane continues to shake and groan under the strain.
Then, all of a sudden—it’s quiet.
The blue sky outside turns black and we can see the curve of the earth reflecting off Neil’s visor. We can see his pen floating.
Neil grabs the pen and jots something down on the notepad in his lap. Over the radio, we can hear a man on the other end. He states Neil is at 140,000 feet, time to begin the descent.
The number on the altimeter starts going down. Fast. 139,000, 138,000, 137,000, 136,000…
Then, something goes wrong. Somewhere around 115,000 feet, the numbers stop falling. They start going back up. 116,000, 117,000, 120,000…over the radio, we hear ground control tell him that he’s bouncing off the atmosphere.
Through some stellar piloting and a little help from a jet burst from the top of the wing, Neil manages to break through and continue his descent back to earth.
Once he lands, we can see the full plane from the outside for the first time. We also get a date for the first time: 1961.
Now, if you recall, Neil Armstrong started his career as a test pilot years before 1961. So, as you can probably guess, this flight we see at the beginning of the movie wasn’t the first test flight Neil Armstrong did. In fact, it wasn’t the first flight in that same aircraft we see in the movie, the X-15.
He flew the X-15 a total of seven times, the first time being in 1960. And it’s interesting the movie says it’s 1961 because it was actually on April 20th, 1962 during Neil Armstrong’s sixth flight of the X-15 that he bounced off the atmosphere of the earth like we see in the movie.
He also didn’t peak out at 140,000 feet above the earth like the movie implies. Neil’s X-15 reached a height of 207,590 feet that day. That’s just over 39 miles high or about 63,250 meters and 63 kilometers.
Fortunately, the X-15 aircraft was designed to go that high. It had control systems he could use that would work outside the earth’s atmosphere. One thing the movie doesn’t mention is that a part of Neil’s mission that day was to test a new G-limiting device called the MH-96. The idea for the MH-96 was to limit the amount of G-forces the plane would encounter.
While the X-15 started its descent, Neil purposely kept the nose of the aircraft pointed up so he could try to hit the 5 G limit and let the MH-96 kick in.
But, it never kicked in. Finally, ground control told him that he’d gone too far—he was getting too close to the massively populated area around Los Angeles. If something went wrong and caused the plane to crash, no one wanted it to happen around L.A.
So, Neil began his descent back toward earth for as long as it took until the normal avionics worked upon entering the atmosphere again. When they did, he turned around and went back to the dry lakebed landing zone where he was supposed to land.
In all, that flight lasted about 12 and a half minutes and saw Neil’s X-15 hitting a max speed of 3,739 MPH or Mach 5.31. That’s over 6,000 km/h, or over five times the speed of sound.
And as amazing as that is, that wasn’t the highest or fastest that the X-15 went. About three months after Neil’s flight that saw him bouncing off the atmosphere with a max altitude of 207,590 feet, Major Robert White took the X-15 up to 314,750 feet or almost 60 miles up—almost 96 kilometers.
For the record, the U.S. Air Force at the time considered space to be 50 miles up, or about 80 kilometers.
So that means Major White’s flight on July 17th, 1962 made him both the first person to fly at Mach 6 as well as the first person to fly a winged vehicle into space.
Back in the movie’s timeline, we cut to the Armstrong’s home. Neil is patting his young daughter’s back while she vomits into a pail of some sort. As she cries, Neil comforts her and plays with her to calm her down. She responds by lying her head on his shoulder, sucking her thumb and just enjoying being close to her dad.
You can tell she’s a daddy’s girl and he’s been totally absorbed by her.
From a brief cut away to what looks like paperwork, we can tell her name is Karen Armstrong. There are a few other clues about what’s going on just by looking at the paperwork, too. For one, it’s from a place called Daniel Freeman Memorial Hospital. Secondly, along the headline we can see something about cobalt therapy.
The camera cuts to Neil alone in his study. He’s on the phone talking about a procedure as he looks over more handwritten notes on his desk in front of him. The notes mention a radiation session, side effects and more.
There’s one sweet scene with Neil sitting alongside his daughter’s bedside. He’s watching over her—playing with her hair as she’s sleeping. It’s one of those times that, as a father, you can recall for years to come. To take a mental photograph of that moment.
In the next scene, it’s heartbreak for the Armstrong family. Neil and his wife Janet, who is played by Claire Foy, are adorned in black. A small boy stands by his parents as they watch a casket being lowered into the earth. Neil’s hands are fiddling with a bracelet—the same bracelet we saw Karen wearing in the scene just before this one.
Of course, we don’t know exactly what it was like in real life, but unfortunately this plot point is true.
Karen Armstrong was born on April 13th, 1959. Neil called her “Muffie” — a shortened version of “Muffin.” When she was just a toddler in 1961, Karen was playing at a park when she fell. Immediately, Neil and Janet knew something was wrong when they saw blood coming out of her nose and her eyes didn’t seem to be focusing on things properly.
At the hospital, the doctors ran some tests and that’s when they found out Karen had a malignant tumor growing on her brain stem. The next few months had to have been a living hell for Neil and Janet as they and the doctors that treated Karen tried their best to treat the young child.
Unfortunately, the tumor proved to be inoperable.
I’m reminded of the words of King Theoden from Lord of the Rings: “No parent should have to bury their child.”
In January of 1962, that’s exactly what Neil and Janet Armstrong faced. Karen’s cause of death was pneumonia, something her little body wasn’t strong enough to fight because of the tumor and probably the treatments the doctors were using to try to fight the tumor. She died on January 28th, only a few months away from her third birthday.
While we’ll never know exactly what it was like for Neil and Janet to bury their baby girl that cold, winter’s day, we do know the movie was correct in showing that they had another child. Eric was born in 1957, making him just five years old as he had to cope with the loss of his baby sister.
Then, in 1963, Neil and Janet had another son—Mark. But that’s getting a bit ahead of our story.
Back in the movie, in the wake of the tragedy, Neil throws himself into work. He’s back at his desk almost immediately. His supervisor, no doubt worried about his focus, tells Neil that his next flight has been canceled. Instead, he’s told to focus on writing up the report from his last flight.
In other words, he’s grounded.
Frustrated, Neil looks at the paperwork strew across his desk. Hidden beneath a typed memo is a paper that catches Neil’s eye. All we can see is a headline that reads:
NASA TO SELECT ASTRONAUTS FOR PROJECT GEMINI
And while it’s really hard to see, when I paused the movie I’m pretty certain the paper is dated April 27th, 1962 with the location of Edwards, California named as well.
Of course, the movie’s details here are highly dramatized but the basic gist is true. There are some things that don’t get documented in history—for example, the thoughts going through Neil and Janet Armstrong’s mind in the wake of little Karen’s death.
What we do know is that the date on the newspaper being in April of 1962 is correct. That’s when NASA first announced they were taking applications for a group of astronauts to join Project Gemini.
And as a quick side note, I found it interesting that in the movie they pronounce it Gemini (GEM-IN-EE) while I’ve always heard it pronounced Gemini (GEM-IN-EYE)—maybe because I grew up near the Cedar Point amusement park in Ohio and they have a rollercoaster called the Gemini. But hey, pronunciations are a dime a dozen—everyone pronounces things different and everyone always insists their pronunciation is the correct one.
That should never be something we let distract us from the story.
Speaking of which, something the movie doesn’t mention was the significance of this round of applicants. This wasn’t the first time NASA put out a call for astronauts. However, it was the first time that NASA opened up the applications to civilians.
Prior to April of 1962, the only people who could apply to be an astronaut were military test pilots. The reason for that simply had to do with security clearances—military test pilots already had security clearance. Civilians did not.
Even though Neil Armstrong had spent time in the Navy, at this point in his career he was a civilian test pilot. That meant he couldn’t apply—at least, not until April of 1962.
And, just like the movie shows, Neil Armstrong did apply.
Although, the movie doesn’t really mention that Neil Armstrong’s application nearly didn’t make the cut. You see, Neil Armstrong didn’t actually manage to get his application in until the second week of June in 1962. The deadline was June 1st.
Fortunately, though, one of the guys that Neil worked with at Edwards Air Force Base noticed his application and—without anyone’s knowledge at the time—added it to the pile of applicants.
In the movie’s next scene, we can see Neil sitting down in a hallway alongside others interviewing for Project Gemini. There’s at least six on screen that I can see…most of them in military uniforms, but Neil and one other man are in suits. They’re the only two civilians applying—at least in this scene. He introduces himself to Neil as Elliot. Text on screen tells us it’s at Ellington Air Force Base. They’re selecting astronauts for Project Gemini.
The date given on screen is August 13th, 1962.
That is true, although it’s worth pointing out that the date of August 13th doesn’t indicate when Neil Armstrong officially became an astronaut. While I couldn’t find anything in my research to say that Neil was sitting in the hallway at Ellington on August 13th like we see in the movie, what we do know from history is that it was one month later, on September 13th, 1962, when Neil Armstrong received the phone call from NASA’s first Chief of the Astronaut Office, Deke Slayton, to let him know he was one of nine men who were now officially NASA’s second group of astronauts.
Neil was one of two civilians in the group. The other was someone we saw sitting in the hallway in the movie with Ryan Gosling’s version of Neil Armstrong—a man by the name of Elliot See.
And as a quick refresher, Deke Slayton is played by Kyle Chandler while Elliot See is played by Patrick Fugit.
Back in the movie, after joining Project Gemini, Neil moves his family to Houston, Texas so he can be closer to other astronaut families and the Space Center in Houston.
At home, Neil and Janet Armstrong have another baby boy. His name is Mark, giving the two happy parents two happy boys. At work, Neil is part of the Space Race between the United States and the Soviets. The U.S. is falling behind the Soviets at every turn.
Just after Neil is tasked with being the commander of Gemini 8, he’s given more tragic news. This time it’s the friend he made in the hallway earlier in the movie, Elliot See. He and another pilot named Charles Bassett are killed in an airplane crash.
The movie does a pretty good job of sticking to these plot points that actually happened here.
We already talked about the Armstrong’s new baby boy, Mark. As we learned earlier, Mark was born on April 8th, 1963. And as a fun little bit of trivia, Mark Armstrong lent his talents to the movie as he played Paul Haney who, in turn, was NASA’s public affairs officer and the voice of the Gemini and Apollo missions in the 1960s.
Even though we haven’t mentioned it yet, the reference in the movie where the American astronauts are watching the Soviets make new strides in space-related technology was also true. This back-and-forth between the Americans and Soviets in the post-World War II decades of the 1950s and 1960s is what we now know as the Space Race.
Basically, both countries were pushing to try and be the first—the first flight in space, the first manned flight in space, the first to the moon, the first to land on the moon…every first was a celebration by one side and a defeat by the other.
But our story today is focused on Neil Armstrong, and he was just one of the many people involved in the Space Race. So, if you want to take a step back and learn more about that overall then check out Based on a True Story episode #75 where we covered the epic film The Right Stuff.
That brings us to Elliot See and Charles Bassett. In the movie, they’re killed before ever going into space. Sadly, that’s true.
It was on February 28th, 1966 when Elliot See was piloting a T-38 jet near St. Louis, Missouri with his Gemini 9 crewmate, Charles Bassett. We don’t know exactly what happened in the cockpit, but according to the official report after the investigation it was determined the crash was caused by pilot error.
It probably didn’t help that it was foggy with a mixture of rain and snow, either.
As a result of this tragic loss of life, the personnel for the Gemini missions were changed. Gemini 9 launched in June of 1966 and since Elliot and Charles died in the plane crash, they were replaced by the backup crew of Thomas Stafford and Eugene Cernan.
Meanwhile, the crew planned for Gemini 10 became the new backup crew for Gemini 9. That’d be Jim Lovell and Buzz Aldrin. Basically, each crew moved up one—and while we’ll never know for sure what would’ve happened if the T-38 hadn’t crashed that February day, it’s also very likely that Buzz Aldrin may not have been slotted for the Apollo 11 mission or maybe even that Jim Lovell may not have been on the Apollo 13 mission.
Which makes you wonder how those missions would’ve been altered. History as we know it today might have been very different.
Going back to the movie, there’s no time to mourn the loss of a friend.
Neil and another astronaut named David Scott take off in Gemini 8. Everything seems to go well until…well, until they don’t. As the movie shows, things start to go wrong after Gemini 8 docks with the Agena Target Vehicle.
That’s when, according to the movie, Neil and Scott’s craft starts to rotate faster and faster out of control. In a moment of what has to be extreme stress, Neil and Scott are cool under pressure. They manage to get control of the craft but are forced to abort the mission.
That’s true, but there’s more to the story. For example, if you’re like me when you first saw this part of the movie you might be thinking, What is the Agena Target Vehicle?
The movie doesn’t do a very good job of explaining what this is—and to be fair, it’s not like the movie is supposed to explain all the technology behind what’s going on in the story.
Since the government likes to turn everything into acronyms, the Agena Target Vehicle is also known as ATV. That’s what I’ll call it from now on.
The purpose behind the ATV was to be a place where the astronauts could practice maneuvers in outer space. Remember, the overall goal established in President Kennedy’s famous speech was to land someone on the moon and return safely to earth. To do that, there had to be incremental steps taken. Part of that meant the ability to dock multiple crafts in outer space—for example, the Lunar Module, or LM, portion of the Apollo spacecraft that would have to dock and undock from the Command and Service Module, or CSM.
So, as part of the Gemini missions, first they had to figure out the logistics of things like docking between two crafts in outer space. That’s where an unmanned vehicle like the ATV came into play.
For the purpose of our story today, this is relevant to the Gemini 8 flight. The ATV had been launched into space about five months earlier, originally for the Gemini 6 flight. However, they weren’t able to complete a docking since there was a mechanical failure that forced the mission be rescheduled.
Just like the movie shows, for Gemini 8 the crew consisted of David Scott as pilot and Neil Armstrong as command pilot. This marked the first space flight for both astronauts.
There were two primary objectives for the Gemini 8 mission. First, they were supposed to dock with the ATV a total of four times—the very first space dockings in the history of mankind.
The second objective was centered around David Scott, who was supposed to do a spacewalk. That’s not walking on the moon, but rather what NASA called an extra-vehicular activity—or EVA. This EVA would take David Scott outside of the Gemini vehicle to retrieve something from the front of the vehicle. The purpose of this wasn’t as a critical part of the mission, but rather as practice to learn more about the logistics of doing a spacewalk. This would’ve been the first since June of 1965.
However, you’ll notice I said it “would’ve been” — that’s because it didn’t happen. We didn’t see it in the movie, and, in this case, the movie was correct to omit it.
That’s because, simply put, things don’t always go according to plan.
Leading up to docking with the ATV, everything seemed alright. A little over 3 hours into the mission, the two astronauts had visual contact with the ATV orbiting the earth. It took another hour or so to get within a range of about 150 feet away from the ATV. That’s a little less than 50 meters.
From this distance, they spent the next half hour or so doing a thorough inspection of the ATV. After the visual inspection and approval from ground control that the ATV was in good condition, they lined up to dock.
It only took a few minutes from there to complete the dock with a satisfying “click” and a green light indicator on the dashboard.
Once docked, the ATV had an automated program began to run and rotated both the ATV and the Gemini vehicle together 90 degrees. As fate would have it, around this time a known radio blackout was about to start. The astronauts were now out of range of communications with the ground.
When the rolling began, the two astronauts tried to stop it using the Orbit Attitude and Maneuvering System, or OAMS. Since you can’t expect a normal airplane’s control systems to work in space—the flaps on the wings or alerions, jet engines themselves and so on. The OAMS were 16 different thrusters on the Gemini that allowed the pilots to control the craft’s rotation and movements in space.
These are what Neil Armstrong and David Scott used to stop the rotation once they docked with the ATV. And it worked…at first.
Before long, the rotation began again. Neil noticed that the OAMS fuel was only about 30%, so he thought maybe there was a problem with the Gemini. So, instead of using the OAMS to stop the rotation, the astronauts decided to undock from the ATV so they could basically take a step back and figure out what was going on.
Except, this caused an even bigger problem. With the ATV and Gemini together, the mass of the connected crafts was much larger than when they were separated. So, after the astronauts managed to undock with a burst of thrusters to back the Gemini away from the ATV, the Gemini started to rotate even more violently.
And by violently…I mean violently. Records indicate their rate of rotation was some 296 degrees per second!
Under these extreme conditions, Neil Armstrong kept a cool head. He turned off the OAMS and instead used the thrusters from the Re-entry Control System, or RCS. The reason for this was because of the location of the thrusters. The RCS thrusters were located on the Gemini craft’s nose.
And it worked.
The rotation slowed…then stopped.
Around this time the communications blackout was over. The Gemini was back in range and let ground control know what had happened. They ran some more tests to figure out what had happened, doing short controlled bursts with each OAMS thruster. One at a time they tested them until they found out one of the thrusters—number 8—was stuck on. That’s why the rotation kept getting faster and faster after they undocked from the ATV.
With the near-disaster resolved, now the astronauts found themselves facing a new problem. To stop the spin, Neil Armstrong used the RCS thrusters. Those were for reentry and now they only had 25% of their fuel left.
The rest of the mission had to be aborted with the two astronauts performing an emergency reentry. Gemini 8 was planned to be a three-day mission. It ended up lasting 10 hours, 41 minutes and 26 seconds.
Back in the movie, tragedy strikes someone close to Neil yet again. This time, Neil is at the White House trying to convince the politicians that NASA’s transition from Project Gemini to the Apollo program is a good idea. Set their minds at ease, you might say.
Back at the launch site in Cape Canaveral, Florida, the three astronauts preparing for the first Apollo mission are running some preflight tests. According to the movie, the date was January 27th, 1967 when Gus Grissom, Ed White and Roger Chaffee were inside the command module as a fire kills all three astronauts.
Hearing the news on the phone, Neil is crushed—as is the wine glass that he was holding in his hand. It’s a horrible tragedy and, unfortunately, it’s one that actually happened.
The date in the movie is correct, too. January 27th, 1967. At the time, the mission was known as Apollo 204 or AS-204. The name was changed to Apollo 1 in the wake of the disaster.
At 1:00 PM local time at Cape Kennedy in Florida, Roger Chaffee, Ed White and Gus Grissom entered the AS-204 capsule on Pad 34 to run some routine pre-launch tests. The launch itself wasn’t scheduled until the following month on February 21st.
Oh, and as a little side note, today that location is known as Cape Canaveral. But, in the decade between 1963 and 1973 it was Cape Kennedy.
Their purpose that Friday was to run through what was known as a “plugs-out” test. In other words, they’d run through the entire countdown sequence from inside the AS-204 Command Module mounted on top of the Saturn rocket just like if it were the real thing. The key difference being that the rocket had no fuel in it, so it wasn’t going to take off.
In the movie, we see there’s a problem with the communications between the astronauts in the Command Module and ground control. That happened, but the movie speeds up the timeline a bit. By that, what I mean is that the communication problem wasn’t the first hint that something was off.
Almost as soon as Gus Grissom got into the Command Module, he made a comment that there was a “sour smell” once he hooked up his suit to the craft’s oxygen supply.
The astronauts took the time to delay the pre-launch test while they investigated. But, they must not have found anything because soon after Gus made the decision to move forward with the test.
Soon after that, another problem arose when the master alarm went off inside the Command Module. The alarm was due to high oxygen flow and yet again the countdown was delayed while they tried to figure it out.
Working with the team on the ground, they eventually decided the alarm must’ve been triggered because the crew inside the Command Module was moving around too much.
Only after these issues delayed the countdown did the communication problem occur. That was at 5:40 PM, so over four hours after they entered the Command Module.
The movie even got the line we hear Shea Whigham’s version of Gus Grissom say correct. The real Gus Grissom complained about the lack of communication by saying, “How are we going to get to the moon if we can’t talk between three buildings?”
He said that at 6:30 PM, after almost an hour of no communication with ground control had delayed the countdown yet again. One minute later, at 6:31 PM, the voltage in AC bus #2 surged. Of course, no one knew it at the time, but in the investigation afterward this surge is pointed to as the start of a possible short-circuit in the system.
Seconds after the record of the surge in voltage, the cockpit recorder caught one of the astronauts say something that no one wanted to hear. We don’t know for sure which of the three astronauts it was, but NASA’s official description of the event indicate it was probably Roger Chaffee.
“Flames!” the voice said.
Ed White’s voice was next to be recorded only two seconds later, “We’ve got a fire in the cockpit.”
A few seconds later, Roger Chaffee spoke again, “We have a bad fire!”
In all, from that first warning of flames in the cockpit to the last communication—17 seconds.
According to NASA’s report on the tragedy, the astronauts didn’t have a chance. The Command Module’s hatch was held closed by two things: The interior pressure of the Command Module was higher than the atmosphere outside, which kept the hatch shut. There were also latches, each of them requiring a ratchet to tighten or loosen.
With the difference in pressure, the fastest they could’ve opened the hatch would be a minimum of 90 seconds. Not only that, but the hatch opened inward making it tough to open from the inside anyway.
In the movie, we don’t see anyone outside the Command Module as the fire takes place. And while that’s sort of true, it’s not like everyone left them alone. Remember, they were already trying to figure out the communication problem. Three minutes after the fire started, there were men on the other side trying to open the hatch. Two minutes later, it was opened.
Five minutes had passed since the fire started. It was already too late. Roger Chaffee, Ed White and Gus Grissom perished within the first 30 seconds of the fire.
Heading back to the movie, we see another date on screen. 1968. Neil’s own life is nearly snuffed out when he’s testing a very strange-looking Lunar Landing Research Vehicle. The craft spirals out of control and Neil has just a fraction of a second to pull the cord to eject from the doomed craft.
There’s a massive explosion, but Neil’s chute manages to whisk him away to safety. That was a close call. Too close. Despite this near-death experience, Kyle Chandler’s character, the chief, Deke Slayton, tells Neil that he’s been chosen to command the next Apollo mission—Apollo 11. Not only that, but Apollo 11 is the first mission with a goal of landing on the moon.
That all happened, but the movie really speeds up the timeline here.
The near-death crash happened on May 6th, 1968. When I first saw the movie, I thought it looked like he was flying the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle over farmland.
However, if you watch the actual footage of the accident you can see it takes place over an air strip. Of course, I’ll have a link to see the video on the post for this episode over at basedonatruestorypodcast.com.
About 100 feet above the ground—that’s about 30 meters—the Lunar Landing Research Vehicle started to bank too dangerously. Neil Armstrong ejected from the craft and managed to parachute safely to the ground as the craft burst into a ball of flames nearby.
According to an after-accident report, it was determined that he would have died if he ejected half a second later.
The crew for Apollo 11 was officially selected about eight months after Neil’s crash in January of 1969. The launch was scheduled for six months later on July 16th.
Just like the movie shows, the three astronauts assigned to Apollo 11 were Commander Neil Armstrong, Lunar Module pilot Buzz Aldrin and Command Module pilot Mike Collins.
Speaking of the movie, back in the film it’s time for the Apollo 11 mission. We see the three astronauts. Of course, Neil Armstrong is played by Ryan Gosling. Mike Collins is played by Lukas Haas while Buzz Aldrin is played by Corey Stoll.
Once they get close to the moon, it’s Buzz and Neil who head into the Lunar Module, or LM for short, to prepare for landing. Mike stays behind.
This is when things start to go awry. As they’re nearing the landing site, Buzz points out that the rocks are the size of cars. They’re way too big—we can’t land here!
Neil takes over manual control and pilots the craft over the designated landing site with only 3% fuel left. There were only seconds left until they would have to force abort the mission so close to the moon.
Then, they land. After a moment of pause in the quiet that followed moments of panic and blaring alarms, Ryan Gosling’s version of Neil Armstrong tells the command center back on earth, “Houston. Tranquility base here. The Eagle has landed.”
That really was something Neil Armstrong said, although he wasn’t trying to wax poetic. Eagle was the name of the Lunar Module for Apollo 11.
Apollo 11 launched at 9:32 AM on July 16th. Over four days later, at 4:17 PM on July 20th, 1969, Neil Armstrong said those words to let ground control know they had landed on the moon at a location known as the Sea of Tranquility.
They were officially the first humans to ever land on the moon. Since then, it’s a phrase has been repeated time and again.
Back in the movie, moments after landing, we see something we’ve all seen from the historical footage.
Real quick, though, the movie speeds up the timeline again here. By that, what I mean is that the movie makes it seem like Neil Armstrong stepped out of the Lunar Module pretty quickly after landing.
However, according to NASA’s official documents on the Apollo 11 mission, Neil Armstrong reported the Eagle has landed at 4:17 PM and 40 seconds on July 20th, 1969. Neil Armstrong’s first step on the moon took place at 10:56 PM and 15 seconds on July 20th.
Both of those times are in Eastern Daylight Time. If you want to hear more about this, I’ve got a supplemental episode I’ll be releasing on the Producer’s Feed to go along with this that’ll have some of the official mission profiles of Apollo 11 from NASA.
According to the movie, at the foot of the ladder Neil tells Houston that the LM footbeds are depressed into the surface about one or two inches…actually, let me stop real quick. If you’ll notice when you’re watching the movie here, the voice talking about the LM footbeds and what the surface of the moon looked like—that voice doesn’t sound like Ryan Gosling.
That’s because the filmmakers used the real archival audio as a backdrop for the visuals they created. So, let’s have the real Neil Armstrong take it from here:


It’s worth pointing out that even though everyone knows that saying today, that’s not exactly what Neil Armstrong said. In an interview soon after the Apollo 11 mission returned home, Neil explained that he actually said, “One small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.”
The word “a” wasn’t heard over the transmission. While that might seem an incredibly small detail, for such a popular quote the omission of the word “a” can change the meaning. Neil wasn’t talking about “man” in some abstract sense. He was talking about how it was a small step for a man—himself—but a giant leap for mankind overall.
Back in the movie, at the very end of the Apollo 11 mission, we see Ryan Gosling’s version of Neil Armstrong on the surface of the moon with the bracelet that his daughter, Karen, was wearing at the beginning of the film. It’s the same bracelet he was holding onto so tightly at her funeral.
With tears in his eyes, Neil looks out at the earth across the void of space and drops the bracelet into the crater near their landing craft.
That…well, the truth is that we don’t know if that’s true or not.
What we do know is that, like everything else on the Apollo 11 mission, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin had objectives they were supposed to do on the surface of the moon.
They took photographs.
They performed experiments, like studying the lunar soil and its properties.
They set up equipment for experiments to be conducted from earth, like the seismic equipment that could be monitored on earth to help get a better idea of the internal structure of the moon.
They collected samples, including soil and 50 rocks totaling a weight of about 50 pounds or 22 kilograms.
They left a few things, too. Of course, there’s the American flag. The movie doesn’t show that, but the astronauts set up a 3-foot by 5-foot American flag. They also left a plaque that said:
Here Men From Planet Earth First Set Foot Upon The Moon July 1969 A.D. We Came In Peace For All Mankind
They even called then-President Richard Nixon from the moon. Overall, the two astronauts were on the surface of the moon for a total of two hours and 31 minutes.
The kicker here is that, for about 11 minutes of that time, Neil Armstrong deviated from the experiments and sample-taking. For that time he did some exploring of his own. No one knows what he did.
There’s a great article I’d recommend you read on The Wrap by Beatrice Verhoeven that dives into this in more depth. Neil never seemed to tell anyone that he did, but that article suggests that some folks close to Neil started to get the idea over the years that maybe he did leave something personal behind on the moon. One of those people was biographer Jim Hansen who wrote the book that the movie is based on and spent plenty of time with Neil Armstrong to do so.
Did he leave something behind? Maybe the bracelet of his little girl, Karen?
The truth is, we just don’t know.
But I’d like to think the movie got it right. I’d like to think that even the accomplishment of being the first man on the moon wasn’t enough to overshadow a father’s love for his daughter.

The post 144: First Man appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/144-first-man/feed/ 0 3224
143: The Crucible https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/143-the-crucible/ https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/143-the-crucible/#respond Mon, 04 Nov 2019 11:00:49 +0000 https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/?p=3247 Resources A Brief History of the Salem Witch Trials The Salem Witch Trials Victims: Who Were They? Records of Salem Witchcraft, Copied from the Original Documents Records of Salem Witchcraft Salem Judges Presiding Over Cases Accusing Witchcraft The Crucible (1996) – IMDb How A 12-Year-Old Sparked The First Witch-Hunt In America All About Abigail Williams, […]

The post 143: The Crucible appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>

Resources

Disclaimer: Dan LeFebvre and/or Based on a True Story may earn commissions from qualifying purchases through our links on this page.

Did you enjoy this episode? Help support the next one!

Buy me a coffeeBuy me a coffee

Transcript

Note: This transcript is automatically generated. There will be mistakes, so please don’t use them for quotes. It is provided for reference use to find things better in the audio.

It’s dark. Winona Ryder’s character, a girl by the name of Abigail Williams, wakes with a start. There’s a girl in the bed with her and with a little shake, Abigail wakes the girl.

Quietly, the two girls get out of bed and place pillows where they were just lying. They cover the pillows with blankets so if anyone were to peek in at them, they’d think the two girls were still in bed. Then, they sneak downstairs and out the side door.

It’s dark outside, but it’s also light. It’s the kind of lighting that makes you think perhaps this is very early in the morning. The camera cuts to another house and we see more girls sneaking out of their homes. Then, an overhead shot shows even more girls as they quietly make their way down the empty, dirt streets of the town. If you pause the movie you can see 12 girls at any one time on the screen.

Speaking of pausing, let’s pause the movie ourselves for a moment here. Surprisingly, the movie doesn’t give any sort of indication of time, date or location. I’m assuming this was meant to be early morning only because of the dark, blue light that we see. Sort of like how I’m assuming this is set in the 1600 or 1700s only because of the way the girls are dressed and the style of homes we see as they sneak out of town. As viewers, we’re left to guess at this, though, because the movie doesn’t give any sort of indication of a time or date.

So, before we continue further, let’s turn to history to date what we’re seeing here and give ourselves a geographical setting.

All this is happening in Salem, Massachusetts. Salem is located on the east coast of the United States. It’s about 15 miles, or 24 kilometers, to the north of Boston and about the same distance to the south of Gloucester, Massachusetts. If that name sounds familiar, that’s because the port of Gloucester is where the Andrea Gail was from—that’s the boat whose story we covered on episode 130 of Based on a True Story about the movie The Perfect Storm.

Our story today takes place a good deal earlier, though. The year is 1692. Salem has been in existence for 66 years and has quickly grown to being one of the most important seaports on the new continent. At this point, of course, the United States wasn’t a thing yet.

As such, Salem was an English colony. More specifically, it was one of the settlements in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Boston was considered another settlement in that same colony.

With that little bit of establishment of time and place, let’s go back to the movie’s storyline. The key plot point here in the beginning shows a young Abigail Williams and a number of other girls from Salem sneaking out in the night to the nearby forest. Once there, a slave named Tituba leads them in some sort of ritual. Tituba is played by Charlayne Woodward, by the way.

In the movie, it’s not clear at first what the purpose is for this gathering of girls. They’re positioned in a circle around a pot that’s sitting on top of a fire. On the ground there’s some sort of symbol.

We start to get a sense of their purpose when Tituba asks them what they brought. The girls each seem to have some flowers in hand. One by one, the girls kiss the flowers in their hand and put them into the pot that’s boiling water over the fire. As they toss the flowers into the pot, the girls start naming names: Joseph Baker, Richard Wilkens, Daniel Hopkins, Daniel Poole, Adam Town, William Bridges, Jacob Poole…there’s a long list of names. Each girl names a different boy.

The ritual has gotten more intense now. Abigail hands Tituba a white sack of some sort. Tituba opens the sack to show a dead chicken inside. She takes the chicken and starts swinging it around, scattering the girls a bit.

As this is going on, the camera cuts to show a man walking through the trees. It’s hard to make out his face because of the low light, but as viewers we can assume he’s not part of the ritual the girls are doing.

Speaking of the ritual, Tituba has stopped spinning the chicken around and now she’s chanting in some foreign language. The closed captions for the movie even just call this, “Chanting in foreign language.”

This chant sounds almost like a song and the girls start swaying back and forth as Tituba chants. At this point is when we get confirmation of what you probably assumed was the purpose of this whole ritual.

One of the girls says, “Make a spell on Joseph Baker, Tituba! Make him love me!” Another calls out, “Make Daniel Poole my husband!”

Then, one of the girls asks Abigail who she wants. Without saying anything herself, another girl answers the question for Abigail. “She wants John Proctor. Get her John Proctor!”

At this point, Abigail takes things to the next level. She whispers something in Tituba’s ear. Tituba immediately begs Abigail not to do whatever she said. That’s a bad thing!

Abigail takes the dead chicken and swings it over her head, then brings it crashing to the ground. We can hear the sound of bones cracking as the chicken hits the rocks surrounding the fire on the ground. Abigail wipes the chicken’s blood on her mouth, presumably drinking some of it in the process. The girls all start screaming and laughing and even tearing off their clothes.

In the forest, we can see the man again. He’s close enough now to see the ritual the girls are performing. He’s also close enough to get a better look at the man’s face. And even though the movie doesn’t mention his name here, we can tell that this is Bruce Davison’s character, Reverend Samuel Parris.

Seeing the Reverend, the girls all scatter. Reverend Parris looks into the pot, but it’s impossible to see what’s inside because of the steam. He pulls out the ladle. A dead frog is on the end of it. Revolted, the Reverend drops the utensil back into the pot.

In the background, we can see there’s only two girls left by the fire. One is Abigail and another is the girl she left the house with earlier. The other girl is screaming something to the effect of, “I can’t move!”

In the next scene, we’re back at Reverend Parris’s home. It’s daytime now. Abigail is in the room with the girl who was screaming she couldn’t move. It’s here that we first hear her name: Betty. It’s also here that we find out something is wrong with Betty—she’s asleep and she won’t wake.

This whole opening sequence of the love spell ritual in the forest outside of Salem is…well, to be honest, we don’t know if it’s true or not. But, it’s probably not.

You see, there’s a lot about the  that we know, but there’s also so much about the events surrounding the story that we just don’t know. With that said, what we do know of the events leading up the Salem witch trials, the evidence suggests that it wasn’t because of a love spell ritual being conducted in secret in the forest like we see in the opening scenes of the movie.

At least, not really.

We haven’t come across him yet in the movie, but one of the real people who was there during the Salem witch trials was a man by the name of John Hale. He’s called Reverend John Hale in the movie and he’s played by Rob Campbell. The reason I mention John Hale now is because he wrote a book called A Modest Enquiry Into the Nature of Witchcraft, and How Persons Guilty of that Crime may be Convicted: And the Means Used for their Discovery Discussed, both Negatively and Affirmatively, according to Scripture and Experience.

That’s a pretty descriptive title, hah! He gives himself the title of pastor, by the way. Not much of a difference in the eyes of a lot of people, but there is a slight one since a reverend usually refers to someone in the clergy while a pastor is a more loose term for the minister leading a church.

But, since all the ministers are called Reverends in the movie that’s what I’ll call John Hale throughout this episode, too.

Reverend Hale’s book was published in 1697, about five years after the events in the movie. I’ll include a link to where you can find the full text of the book over on the page for this episode at basedonatruestorypodcast.com.

This is a quote from Reverend Hale’s book where he gives us a clue as to what might’ve been at the start of it all:

I fear some young persons through a vain curiosity to know their future condition, have tampered with the Devils tools, so far that hereby one door was opened to Satan to play those pranks. I knew one of the Afflicted persons, who (as I was credibly informed) did try with an egg and a glass to find her future Husbands Calling; till there came up a Coffin, that is, a Spectre in likeness of a Coffin. And she was afterward followed with diabolical molestation to her death; and so dyed a single person. A just warning to others, to take heed of handling the Devils weapons, lest they get a wound thereby.

Another, I was called to pray with, being under sore fits and vexations of Satan. And upon examination I found she had tryed the same charm: and after her confession of it and manifestation of repentance for it, and our prayers to God for her, she was speedily released from those bonds of Satan. This iniquity though I take it not to be the Capital crime condemned, Exod. 22. Because such persons act ignorantly, not considering they hereby go to the Devil; yet borders very much upon it: and is too like Sauls going to the Witch at Endor, and Ahaziah sending to the God of Ekron to enquire.

Did you catch the mention of the charm?

Reverend Hale mentioned one of the girls tried to use an egg and a glass to try to find her future husband’s calling. Instead, she found a specter in the form of a coffin. Then, he says he discovered another of the girls tried the same charm.

So, what exactly does that mean?

What Reverend Hale is referring to is something known as a oomancy, or sometimes referred to as a Venus glass. It was thought to have been something like a crystal ball; something used to tell one’s future.

Remember that scene in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban where Harry is in Professor Trelawney’s divination class and he sees the tea leaves at the bottom of his cup reveal the Grim?

Well, that’s basically what this charm was. Except instead of tea leaves, they used an egg. The basic concept of this method of divination is to provide some sort of heat and drop an egg on to it. Then you read the shape the egg white takes when it starts to solidify. As Hale mentioned, the girls seemed to have been using this as a way of telling who their future husbands might be.

As the story goes, the two girls who started playing with this form of divination might’ve been Abigail Williams and Betty Parris. They got scared when the egg white revealed the shape of a coffin, presumably predicting some horrible fate.

So, it’s not likely they were performing a love spell ritual like we see in the movie. Instead, they were using eggs as a form of divination. Think about that the next time you crack an egg over your pan—the shape you see when the egg whites hit the heated pan was one of the ingredients that went into the Salem witch trials hysteria.

On the other side of that, Reverend Hale’s words also give us a peek into the mindset of Christianity of the day as he mentions the charm being the bonds of Satan. In fact, Reverend Hale’s book opens with a scripture verse from Isaiah 8:19-20:

When they say unto you, seek unto them that have Familiar Spirits and unto Wizzards, that peep, &c. To the Law and to the Testimony; if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.

The witch that Reverend Hale mentions is also from the Bible—the Witch of Endor. That comes from 1 Samuel 28:6-8 when the first king of Israel, Saul, sought out the council of a witch in the city of Endor. He asked the witch to, “divine unto me by the familiar spirit, and bring me him up, whom I shall name unto thee.”

As that story goes, King Saul asked for the spirit of his old mentor and prophet of God, Samuel. But things didn’t turn out so well when the spirit of Samuel prophesied the Israelites would be defeated by the Philistines the next day. And, so, you start to get an idea for why the Christians in Salem could see this as an example of cause and effect. Essentially, there are dire consequences for getting help from a witch.

There’s a long list of other Bible verses that speak to the evils of witchcraft:

  • Leviticus 19:26b, “You shall not interpret omens or tell fortunes.”
  • 1 Samuel 15:23a, “For rebellion is as the sin of divination…”
  • 1 Chronicles 10:13-14, “So Saul died for his breach of faith. He broke faith with the Lord in that he did not keep the command of the Lord, and also consulted a medium, seeking guidance. He did not seek guidance from the Lord. Therefore the Lord put him to death and turned the kingdom over to David the son of Jesse.”

There’s more, but the last one I’ll reference comes from Leviticus 20:27:

A man or a woman who is a medium or a necromancer shall surely be put to death. They shall be stoned with stones; their blood shall be upon them.

For the purpose of our story today, that sort of Biblical story is exactly why the Christian leaders in Salem would’ve forbade any sort of contact with witchcraft. Even something like using eggs for divination would’ve been seen as the work of the devil and the penalty…well, it’s not good.

Going back to the movie, after the ritual in the forest we find out that Betty Parris isn’t waking up. Reverend Parris tells Abigail to go get the doctor. So, she goes to get the doctor. Knocking on the door, a Mrs. Griggs answers. Abigail asks for the doctor because Betty won’t wake up.

She’s puzzled. She tells Abigail the doctor isn’t in—he’s at the Putnam house because Ruth Putnam won’t wake up, either. After this, the scene cuts to a girl in bed staring at the camera. Dr. Griggs waves his hand over her eyes, but they don’t move. They don’t blink.

Dr. Griggs goes on to inform the others in the room that he’s never seen anything like this. There’s no fever. No wound. And yet, she sleeps.

The others in the room are the girl’s parents, Thomas and Ann Putnam, as well as Reverend Parris. In the background we can see Abigail Williams is there, too, as is Mercy Lewis.

When Reverend Parris tells the doctor about his Betty being the same, the doctor is surprised. Ann jumps to an answer.

“It’s the devil, isn’t it?”

Dr. Griggs isn’t so quick to jump to that conclusion. He simply says this may be a sickness beyond his skill.

But then, in the next scene, we see Thomas Putnam walking and talking to Reverend Parris. Thomas, too, seems convinced this is witchcraft. Parris begs Thomas not to jump to witchcraft that quickly. Thomas insists that Reverend Parris admit it is witchcraft. Parris replies by saying he needs time to think.

That’s not really what happened. Of course, we’ll never know the exact conversations that took place or the thoughts, beliefs and fears of the people in Salem in 1692, but as best as we can tell what really happened was that Abigail Williams and Betty Parris started having uncontrollable fits.

He’s not in the movie at all, but another spiritual leader in the community, Reverend Deodat Lawson, wrote about what he saw. This is a quote from his book published in 1692 called, A brief and true narrative of some remarkable passages relating to sundry persons afflicted by witchcraft, in Salem Village: which happened from the nineteenth of March, to the fifth of April, 1692.

That was just the title of the book. Hah!

Oh, and it’s worth mentioning that despite the title of Lawson’s book, Abigail Williams and Betty Parris started throwing fits in either January or February of 1692. A little later, Lawson recounted seeing one of those fits. Here’s a quote from Reverend Lawson’s experience:

On the Nineteenth day of March last I went to Salem Village, and lodged at Nathaniel Ingersols near to the Minister Mr. P. house, and presently after, I came into my Lodging. Capt. Walents Daughter Mary came to Lieut. Ingersols and spake to me, but, suddenly after as she stood by the door, was bitten, so that she cried out of her Wrist and looking on it with a Candle, we saw apparently the marks of Teeth both upper and lower set, on each side of her wrist.

In the beginning of the Evening, I went to give Mr. P. a visit. When I was there, his Kins-woman, Abigail Williams, (about 12 years of age,) had a grievous fit; she was at first hurryed with Violence to and fro in the room; (though Mrs. Ingersol, endeavoured to Hold her,) sometimes makeing as if she would fly, stretching up her arms as high as she could, and crying Whish, Whish, Whish! several times; Presently after she said there was Goodwife N. and said, Do you not see her? Why there she stands! And she said Goodwife N. offered her THE BOOK, but she was resolved she would not take it, saying Often, I wont, I wont, I wont, take it, I do not know what Book it is: I am sure it is none of Gods Book, it is the Divels Book, for ought I know. After that, she run to the Fire, and begun to throw Fire Briands, about the house; and run against the Back, as if she would run up Chimney, and, as they said, she had attempted to go into the Fire in other Fits.

The “Minister Mr. P.” mentioned is Reverend Parris and I’m assuming the Goodwife N. mentioned is Rebecca Nurse, but I couldn’t find anything to confirm that.

From Reverend Lawson’s account, we not only get a sense for what one of Abigail’s fits was like but we also get an idea for how she named others. That mention of Goodwife N., “Do you not see her? Why there she stands!”

One thing the movie got right, though, was that Abigail was living in the Parris house because her own parents had been killed. Reverend Parris was Abigail’s uncle, making the Reverend’s daughter, Elizabeth—or Betty in the movie—Abigail’s cousin.

When the real Dr. Griggs examined Abigail to try to figure out what was causing these fits, he couldn’t find anything wrong with her. Since these came after it was discovered she was using divination, it didn’t take long for the idea that this was witchcraft to enter the picture.

Abigail wasn’t the only one having these fits, either. Here’s another excerpt from Reverend Lawson’s book that explains how it spread. If you recall, the last excerpt mentions the 19th of March. This is from two days later on Monday the 21st.

The Number of the Afflicted Persons were about that time Ten, viz. Four Married Women, Mrs Pope, Mrs. Putman, Goodw. Bibber, and an Ancient Woman, named Goodall, three Maids, Mary Walcut, Mercy Lewes, at Thomas Putman’s, and a Maid at Dr. Griggs’s, there were three Girls from 9 to 12 Years of Age, each of them, or thereabouts, viz. Elizabeth Parris, Abigail William and Ann Putman; these were most of them at Examination, and did vehemently accuse her in the Assembly of afflicting them, by Biting, Pinching, Strangling, &c.

You’ll notice the mention of Mrs. Putnam being afflicted. That’s not something we see in the movie.

Speaking of which, going back to the movie, we quickly find out one of the key drivers for Winona Ryder’s version of Abigail Williams. That happens when we see Daniel Day-Lewis’s character, John Proctor. He’s called into town to attend a town meeting in which Reverend Parris mentions he’s called for Reverend John Hale from Beverly.

As a quick side note, the town of Beverly is only about 2.5 miles, or about 4 kilometers, to the north of Salem.

According to the movie, Abigail Williams used to work for John Proctor and his wife, Elizabeth. The movie goes even further to say that Abigail and John had an affair and it was this affair that was the ultimate reason why Elizabeth Proctor fired Abigail and forced her to leave their house.

In fact, that’s a very major plot point in the movie that runs through the entire movie.

And it’s one that’s entirely made up.

Although John and Elizabeth Proctor were real people, there’s no evidence to suggest John Proctor had an affair with Abigail Williams. And that brings up something else the movie changed to make this affair much more plausible: Their ages.

Even though I don’t know for certain the exact dates for when they shot the movie, we know Winona Ryder was born in 1971 and the movie was released in 1996—25 years later. So, Winona Ryder would’ve been in her 20s when she played the part of Abigail Williams.

On the other side of the affair we see in the movie is John Proctor. He’s played by Daniel Day-Lewis who was in his mid-40s during the shooting of the movie. That makes it an affair between a 20-something Winona Ryder’s Abigail Williams and a 40s-something Daniel Day Lewis’s John Proctor.

In truth, Abigail Williams wasn’t quite 12 years old and John Proctor was almost 60 years old when this all happened.

You might have caught that mention of Abigail’s age in Reverend Lawson’s description of her fit. He said Abigail was about 12 years old. In fact, she was 11. Abigail was born on July 12th, 1680 and since the fit Reverend Lawson mentioned happened on March 19th, 1692, that means Abigail would’ve been 11 years, 8 months and 7 days old.

And since John Proctor was born on March 30th, 1632, that would make him 59 years, 11 months and 20 days old on the account from Reverend Lawson on March 19th, 1692.

While the age difference alone isn’t proof that there wasn’t an affair between John and Abigail, as I mentioned a moment ago, there doesn’t seem to be any evidence to suggest the two had an affair. Since the romance between John and Abigail is a major part of the movie’s storyline, that can give you an idea for how accurate the rest of the movie is.

In fact, many historians believe the first time Abigail even met John was at the trials. If that’s true, that would mean Abigail accused him of witchcraft without even knowing who he was.

Speaking of accusations, if we head back to the movie’s timeline, the accusations begin.

We see it happen when Reverend Hale arrives in town. After Reverend Parris tells Hale about the dancing he saw in the forest—Hale is shocked to find they allow dancing. But, don’t worry, Parris tells Hale they don’t allow dancing.

‘Twas secret.

As a little side note, it is true that early American Puritans were against dancing. Although, some historians might be quick to point out that they didn’t believe it to be so evil like the movie seems to imply. They merely believed it was suggestive and they were against anything of a sexual theme. So, if they did dance, it’d be at an arm’s length.

In the movie, though, as Reverend Hale is trying to get to the bottom of what went on in the forest, he quickly starts to suspect something evil as Parris tells him about the boiling pot.

Hale gathers up all the girls and tries to get them to tell him what was going on as they danced around the fire in the forest. Were they casting spells? Did they drink from the pot?

One of the girls points at Winona Ryder’s version of Abigail Williams, who quickly denies anything. Instead, she passes the blame and says it was all Tituba’s idea. The scene cuts to Tituba’s place and the men grab her to interrogate. Abigail is there and continues to point fingers at Tituba.

“She did this! She made me drink blood!”

Reverend Parris whips Tituba as they try to get the truth out of her. When they say they’ll hang her, Tituba confesses to being a witch.

As viewers, it’s clear the choice Tituba had wasn’t much of a choice at all. Confess to being a witch or we’ll hang you. What would you do in that situation?

And while the movie is highly dramatized in how this all went down, there are some kernels of truth in there.

It is true that a slave named Tituba was one of the first accused. The charge against her was afflicting four girls: Abigail Williams, Betty Parris, Ann Putnam, Jr., and Elizabeth Hubbard.

Sort of like we heard from Reverend Lawson’s account, the girls were throwing fits and claiming they were being pinched, bitten or strangled by invisible spirits. They claimed Tituba was one of those spirits. Tituba, in turn, blamed two other women in town: Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne.

Like the movie shows, Sarah Good was a homeless woman who had earned a bad reputation in town for begging for food and shelter from people. So, no one thought twice when she was accused of witchcraft. It made sense to them. Sarah Osborne also had a poor reputation in town. It wasn’t for being homeless, but instead Sarah Osborne’s bad reputation came from her marrying one of her servants.

Oh, and she also didn’t go to church as much as people thought she should.

As for Tituba, well, she was a South American Indian and Reverend Parris’s slave. Race and cultural differences certainly played a part in her accusation.

Ultimately, no one was surprised when these three were accused of witchcraft. No one defended them. They were different. As a result, it was Tituba, Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne that were the first three people arrested in what we now know as the Salem witch trials.

Back in the movie, we see there are more accused. A court is set up to get to the bottom of this. According to the movie, there are three judges, Judge Danforth, Judge Hathorne and Judge Sewall.

There’s a montage of sorts as we see Sarah Good and Sarah Osborne arrested. Soon after is someone named Mary Sibber. She was upset that someone’s goat was in her garden and because she yelled, “Devil take you all!” apparently that was enough reason for her to get locked up.

Then there’s another woman and her daughter. The movie doesn’t give us their name, we just see them as they happen to be nearby when a cart passes and breaks down. They must be witches, so they’re accused.

Mr. Jacobs is next. We see a scene where Thomas Putnam is arguing with Jacob Proctor over the borders of their land, which butts up against each other. As Thomas is leaving, he sees Mr. Jacobs. In the next scene, Mr. Jacobs is accused in front of the court.

Ruth Parris, Thomas’s daughter, claims that Mr. Jacobs snuck through her window. The elderly Mr. Jacobs laughs at this. Raising the two sticks in his hand, he points out to the three judges that he has to walk with two sticks—how am I supposed to get through a window?

Judge Hathorne insists that Mr. Jacobs could’ve sent his spirit through the window!

Mr. Jacobs is befuddled. How do you do that?

As Mr. Jacobs is talking, Ruth Parris gets close to one of the judges and whispers something to him. She claims she sees a black man on Mr. Jacobs’s shoulder, whispering to him. Almost immediately, the other girls—Abigail Williams, and so on—start saying the same thing. They see the same spirit on Mr. Jacobs’s shoulder.

Mr. Jacobs is sentenced to be hanged.

What we see in the movie here with this court and the three judges is quite disturbing. Do the judges already have an idea that these accused are all guilty? We see it almost right away when Judge Hathorne suggests that Mr. Jacobs’s spirit might’ve gone through Ruth Parris’s window.

The only one the movie seems to imply might be concerned over what’s going on is Judge Sewall. At one point he mentions to Judge Danforth that he didn’t expect all their evidence of witchery to come from children. Danforth tells Sewall to remember the Gospel, “From the mouths of babes shall come the truth.”

It’s almost as if the judges are trying to prove the accusations are correct.

They’re hardly impartial.

All of that is…well, it’s a movie, so it’s never going to be entirely true. But, there are some key elements in there that the movie got right.

Although it’s interesting that Danforth in the movie quotes, “From the mouths of babes shall come the truth,” and implies it comes from the Gospels. That would be the books of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John in the New Testament and while the “mouths of babes” saying is a common one, that direct quote isn’t from the Gospels.

The closest scripture from the four Gospels is Matthew 21:16 which says, “And they said to him, ‘Do you hear what these are saying?” And Jesus said to them, “Yes; have you never read, ‘Out of the mouth of infants and nursing babies you have prepared praise’?”

That scripture, of course, implies that the saying existed before Jesus said it. And it did. For example, while the Gospels are in the New Testament, in the Old Testament there’s another scripture, Psalms 8:2, which says, “Out of the mouth of babies and infants, you have established strength because of your foes, to still the enemy and the avenger.”

But, Judge Danforth’s apparent misquoting of scripture aside, the movie is correct in showing him there. Same with Judge Hathorne, whose first name was John. He was also there. So was Samuel Sewall.

The movie implies those were the only three judges the entire time: Danforth, Sewall and Hathorne.

And that is not correct; it’s a simplification.

The truth is a little more complex, and it also gives us another glimpse into the overall historical accuracy of the movie.

The real Thomas Danforth came to the New World in 1634 from England to escape persecution of his Puritan beliefs. He was known as very conservative, and by the time 1692 rolled around, he was the acting governor of the Province of Massachusetts Bay. He was acting because, in 1688, there was what we now know as the Glorious Revolution.

Basically, a bunch of Puritan leaders revolted against King James II and established a governor over a new land they called the Dominion of New England. After the Glorious Revolution, the Dominion of New England collapsed, and the Province of Massachusetts Bay was re-established with Thomas Danforth as the governor.

So, it was Thomas Danforth who was essentially the man in charge when all this started happening in Salem in the early months of 1692. So, the movie got that right. But the movie shows Thomas Danforth there in Salem for the entire duration—and that is not right.

Danforth’s involvement in the trials ended in May of 1692, so he was only there for a few months. The others presiding over the trials for the beginning months of 1692 alongside Thomas Danforth were John Hathorne, Jonathan Corwin, who is sometimes listed as a Sheriff, and Bartholomew Gedney.

The last two of those weren’t even in the movie.

But then, all that changed in May. As I just mentioned, Danforth left. The reason for that had to do with the Glorious Rebellion of 1688 that I mentioned earlier. More specifically it had to do with Thomas Danforth not being a fan of King James II. So, it was only a matter of time before he was replaced.

That replacement arrived from England in May of 1692.

The new governor’s name was William Phips and when he arrived he set up a new court with some new people.

For the purposes of our story today, essentially Thomas Danforth was the only one that was replaced from the panel of judges. I’m sure it was no coincidence that Danforth was the one who was outspoken against King James II, either.

Replacing Danforth’s position as heading up the trials at Salem was a new chief magistrate, a man by the name of William Stoughton. He was the Lieutenant Governor beneath William Phips.

As you probably guessed, Stoughton wasn’t in the movie at all.

But then again, neither were most of the other judges that came with the change in leadership in May of 1692.

The three judges who were in the court alongside Thomas Danforth stayed on. That’d be Jonathan Corwin, Bartholomew Gedney and the only other one we see in the movie, John Hathorne.

And right now, you might be wondering…but wait a minute, what about Samuel Sewall? He was in the movie!

Yes, he was. But he wasn’t a part of the trials under Danforth. He joined in May of 1692, as did Nathanial Saltonstall, Peter Sergeant and Wait Still Winthrop.

Whew!

Okay, so basically the movie shows three judges. Danforth, Sewall and Hathorne. In reality, Danforth and Hathorne were there at the beginning of the trials alongside two other judges that weren’t in the movie. In May of 1692, Hathorne and those two other judges stayed on while Danforth left. That’s also when Samuel Sewall and five others joined the court.

And that doesn’t even count some of the other little changes that happened. For example, how Nathaniel Saltonstall joined in May but resigned in June. Or others like Thomas Newton and Anthony Checkley who were the lawyers on the side of the Crown.

I can see why the movie simplified things, haha!

With all that said, in the movie we see Thomas Danforth and John Hathorne seem to be the primary drivers behind believing the girls while Samuel Sewall goes along with it—but isn’t so sure.

Again, this is an oversimplification.

You might think that just because the movie’s incorrect in showing Thomas Danforth being there the whole time that perhaps his replacement, William Stoughton, might be better.

But…that’s not necessarily true.

At least, not as far as the fate of those accused. For example, in June of 1692, Rebecca Nurse was one of the women accused of witchcraft. We see that in the movie. What we don’t see is that her trial ended with the jury declaring her not guilty.

It was Chief Magistrate William Stoughton who bowed to public outcry and requested the jury review the case again. This time, they found her guilty and on July 19th, 1692, Rebecca was sentenced to death.

As for John Hathorne, he’s portrayed in the movie as someone who seems to buy into the belief that they’re witches from the beginning. There’s one scene, in particular, when Robert Breuler’s version of Judge Hathorne is questioning Martha Corey.

He asks Martha if she’s a witch.

She says she’s not a witch.

Then she says she doesn’t even know what a witch is!

“If you don’t know what a witch is, how do you know you are not one?” Judge Hathorne is smug in his response.

While the overall idea that Judge Hathorne seemingly already had the accused’s guilt in mind like we see in the movie isn’t accurate, that particular exchange was one that really happened. It’s probably the most popular exchange for Judge Hathorne, although it’s not with Martha Corey like we see in the movie—it was with another accused, Bridget Bishop.

But, Bridget Bishop isn’t even in the movie, so maybe that’s why they changed it. Oh, and like a lot of the other things we’ve looked at so far, the movie’s version is simplified.

And we know that because we have the original transcripts. This comes from a book called Record of Salem Witchcraft, copied from the Original Documents Volume 1 by W. Elliot Woodward and published in 1864.

Of course, I’ll include a link to where you can read the entire book for free online on the page for this episode over at basedonatruestorypodcast.com.

But, for the sake of this back-and-forth, I’ll save you the trouble of reading it. Unfortunately the transcript doesn’t really mention who is saying what, but hopefully you can figure out who is Judge Hathorne and who is Bridget Bishop just from what’s being said. For the most part it’s pretty clear, and it gives you a sense of what it must’ve been like in that courtroom with the afflicted girls seemingly being affected by Bridget.

The examination of Bridget Byshop at Salem Village 19. Apr. 1692

By John Hathorn & Jonath : Corwin esq.

As soon as she came near all fell into fits.

Bridget Byshop you are now brought beore Authority to give acco of what witchcrafts you are conversant in

I take all this people (turning her hea and eyes about) to witness that I am clear.

Hath this woman hurt you speating to ye afflicted.

Eliz Hubbard, Ann Putnam, Abigail Williams and Mercy Lewes affirmed that she had hurt them.

You are here accused by 4 or 5 for hurting them, what do you say to it?

I never saw these persons before, nor I never was in this place before.

Mary Walcot said that her brother Jonathan stroke her appearance and she saw that he had tore her coat in striking, and she heart it tare.

Upon some search in the Court a rent that seems to answer what was alledged was found.

They say you bewitch your first husband to death

If it please your worship I know nothing of it.

—She shake her head and the afflicted were tortured.

—The like again upon the motion of her head.

Sam: Braybook affirmed that she told him to day that she had been accounted a witch these-10-years, but she was no witch the Devil cannot hurt her

I am no witch

Why if you have not wrote in the book, yet tell me how far you have gone?

I have no familiarity with the devil.

How is it then, that your appearance doth hurt these?

I am innocent.

Why you seem to act witchcraft before us by the motion of your body which seems to have influence upon the afflicted.

I know nothing of it. I am innocent to a witch. I know not what a witch is.

How do you know then that you are not a witch

I do not know what you say.

How can you know, you are no witch, and yet not know what a witch is.

I am clear: if I were any such person you should know it.

You may threaten, but you can do no more than you are permitted.

I am innocent of a witch

What do you say of those murders you are charged with?

I hope, I am not guilty of murder,

Then she turned up her eyes, and the eyes of the afflicted were turned up:

It may be you do not know, that any have confessed to day, who have been examined before you, that they are witches.

No. I know nothing of it.

John Hutchinson and John Lewis in open Court affirmed that they had told her.

Why look you, you are taken now in a flat lyre.

I did not hear them.

Note: Same: Gold faith that after this examination he asked Bridget Byshop if she were not troubled to see the afflicted persons so tormented, said Byshop answered no she was not troubled for them: Then he askt her whether she thought they were bewitch she said she could not tell what to think about them. Will Good and John Buxton junt was by and he supposeth they heard her also.

Mr Sam Parris being desired to take in wrighting the Examination of Bridget Bishop, hath delivered it as aforesaid. And upon hearing ye same and seeing what wee did then see together with the charge of the afflicted persons then present: Wee committed said Bridget Olliver.

— John Hathorne.

That’s just the first examination of Bridget Bishop. It continues with another round by John Hathorne and Jonathan Curren…and beyond. Again, if you haven’t yet then go check out the original transcripts. It’ll give you a good idea of what was being said and the back and forth.

And if you picture the scene sort of like we see in the movie, even though what’s being said is different you can also imagine the group of afflicted girls repeating what the accused does—like the transcript said when Bridget shakes her head, the afflicted “were tortured.”

As the movie comes to a close, we see the affair between John Proctor and Abigail Williams come out in the open. Elizabeth Proctor is called to testify, but she doesn’t know John has already confessed to the affair.

So, she lies about it. She thinks she’s saving her husband. Instead, the opposite is true.

Of course, we already know that’s all made up—as I mentioned earlier, there’s no evidence of an affair between John Proctor and Abigail Williams.

But the final sequence we see Winona Ryder’s version of Abigail Williams in is when she flees Salem. She steals money from her uncle and disappears. The movie implies she took a ship somewhere.

Then, back in Salem, John Proctor at first signs a confession, then he takes it back. He can’t bring himself to confess. The last scene we see is Daniel Day-Lewis’s version of John Proctor on the gallows alongside Mary Pat Gleason’s version of Martha Corey and Elizabeth Lawrence’s version of Rebecca Nurse.

It’s Rebecca who starts quoting the Lord’s prayer.

“Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be Thy name.”

Martha and John continue the prayer with Rebecca.

“Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done. On earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive them that trespass against us.”

The camera cuts to the crowd watching the hanging. Earlier when we saw people being hanged, the crowd was cheering and joyful at the deaths. This time, they’re not. They’re looking on in shock at the scene unfolding in front of them.

The prayer continues, “Lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil…”

The camera zooms in on John Proctor. At this point, we hear a noise. If you have the closed captions turned on then you’d see the movie tell us what that noise was: Neck snaps.

There are only two voices now.

John continues, his voice raising, “For Thine is the kingdom and the power and the glory…”

Another noise.

John’s voice is alone now.

“…forever and ever…”

John’s face drops from the camera’s view. Another noise.

And just like most of this movie, there are parts of that that are true, parts of it that aren’t and some parts that we just don’t know.

Let’s start with Abigail Williams. She’s one of those “we just don’t know.” The reason for that is because everything we do know about all of this comes from the written records that have survived.

And after the trials, there simply are no written records that mention Abigail Williams. She seems to just disappear.

Did she steal money from her uncle and run away like the movie implies? Maybe. There are some stories that suggest she did exactly that. There are other stories that say she died just five years after the trials in 1697 at the age of 17.

In the end, we just don’t know…and we probably never will.

That brings us to the death of John Proctor. That is true, but it didn’t happen the way the movie shows. Probably the closest part the movie got right was that Abigail Williams accused John’s wife, Elizabeth. It was because John defended Elizabeth that led the accusations to turn to him, too.

One tidbit I thought was interesting the movie got wrong had to do with John’s confession. When we see Daniel Day-Lewsis’s version of John Proctor sign the confession, if you pause the movie you can see at the top the paper says: “Confession of John Proctor on this 14 day of November 1692.”

The real John Proctor was executed on August 19th, 1692. Unlike what we see in the movie, Martha Corey didn’t die alongside John that day. She was executed on September 22nd, 1692. Rebecca Nurse also wasn’t there that same day. She was executed before John and Martha on July 19th, 1692.

At the very end of the movie, we get some text on screen that tells us the Salem witch hunt ended after 19 executions. The reason it ended was because more and more accused people refused to save themselves by giving false confessions. Just like we see John Proctor refuse to do in the movie.

That number is true. There were over 200 people who were accused of witchcraft, but not everyone who was accused was arrested. About 150 of them were, though.

In the end a total 14 women and five men were found guilty and executed between February of 1692 and May of 1693.

Lest we forget, here are the names of the 19 people in the order of their execution:

  • Bridget Bishop, June 10th, 1692
  • Sarah Good, July 19th, 1692
  • Elizabeth Howe, July 19th, 1692
  • Susannah Martin, July 19th, 1692
  • Rebecca Nurse, July 19th, 1692
  • Sarah Wildes, July 19th, 1692
  • Reverend George Burroughs, August 19th, 1692
  • Martha Carrier, August 19th, 1692
  • John Willard, August 19th, 1692
  • George Jacobs, Sr., August 19th, 1692
  • John Proctor, August 19th, 1692
  • Alice Parker, September 22nd, 1692
  • Mary Parker, September 22nd, 1692
  • Ann Pudeator, September 22nd, 1692
  • Wilmot Redd, September 22nd, 1692
  • Margaret Scott, September 22nd, 1692
  • Samuel Wardwell, September 22nd, 1692
  • Martha Corey, September 22nd, 1692
  • Mary Easty, September 22nd, 1692

That number doesn’t include a 20th victim. That would be Giles Corey, who is often listed separately because the movie correctly showed was executed by pressing—or, being crushed to death by stones. Although his execution didn’t have to do with refusing to say someone’s name like the movie implies.

Instead, he was accused of witchcraft like his wife, Martha, was and Giles was the only one of the accused who refused to enter any sort of plea at all. He wouldn’t say he was guilty, and he wouldn’t say he was innocent. So, they tortured him by pressing because he refused to give a plea. That torture went on for three days before Giles died…just three days before his wife, Martha, would be executed by hanging.

That number also doesn’t include another four or five people who died while they were imprisoned during the trials, most likely due to illness or some other reason that happens when you’re imprisoned in 17th century Massachusetts.

The text at the end of the movie implies that trials ended because so many people refused to confess. While it is true that a lot of people refused to confess—after all, lying was a sin, too—the real driver behind the end of the witch trials was in September of 1692 when spectral evidence was declared inadmissible in court.

Since most of the evidence up until that point had been based on the dreams and visions of those who had made accusations, the remaining people in custody ended up being found not guilty. The hangings on September 22nd, 1692 were the final executions of the Salem witch trials.

In the last few months of the trials, there were a few more warrants for execution, but Governor William Phips stepped in and pardoned them. Others were found not guilty and eventually released. The trials officially ended in May of 1693 when the final prisoners were released, a little over a year since the first of the trials began in February of 1692.

In the centuries since, countless people have tried to figure out the cause for the trials. Some have suggested it was a fabrication by greedy landowners. Those who suggest this theory point to a feud between the Putnam family and the Proctor family that had been going on for a while before the witch trials. There were others in the community who had similar disagreements going on that caused accusations, but we saw a hint at this when Thomas Putnam tried to take over Mr. Jacobs’s land in the movie.

Others say it was a case of mass hysteria that started when Puritan beliefs collided with those in the community deemed to be outside the church and looked down upon.

Some of those at the heart of the trials apologized. Judge Samuel Sewall, for example, issued an apology on January 15th, 1697—the same day that Governor Stoughton declared a Day of Official Humiliation as the entire community prayed and fasted and asked God for forgiveness for what they’d done.

Five years later, the General Court in Massachusetts officially declared the trials were unlawful.

In an ironic twist, one of the girls who had thrown accusations around later claimed she had been taken over by the devil to do what she had done. 13 years after the trials ended, in 1706, Ann Putnam, Jr., apologized for her actions by saying:

I desire to be humbled before God for that sad and humbling providence that befell my father’s family in the year about ninety-two; that I, then being in my childhood, should, by such a providence of God, be made an instrument for the accusing of several people for grievous crimes, whereby their lives was taken away from them, whom, now I have just grounds and good reason to believe they were innocent persons; and that it was a great delusion of Satan that deceived me in that sad time.

Five years later, in 1711, a bill was passed that officially restored the good names and rights of those who had been accused. Their heirs were also given £600 pounds for restitution. It’s really tough to convert currency like that, especially since the United States wasn’t even a thing then. But, as best as I can tell, that £600 pounds in 1711 would be roughly the same as $92,000.00 in today’s U.S. dollars.

Then, for hundreds of years, much of the world forgot about the Salem witch trials.

It wasn’t until Arthur Miller’s play that the movie was based on, also called The Crucible, was released in 1953 that the trials were once again given the spotlight of the world. Four years after The Crucible hit the stage, in 1957, the state of Massachusetts officially and formally apologized for the events that took place in 1692.

The post 143: The Crucible appeared first on Based on a True Story.

]]>
https://www.basedonatruestorypodcast.com/143-the-crucible/feed/ 0 3247